Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer) - page 6. (Read 351555 times)

legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1036
Anybody fancy giving a new ATI miner a hand with some configurations?

I've recently moved over from Nvidia after my 750 Ti basically blew up on me, so I have an R9 280x now.

I'm trying to get to grips with the original cgminer, but then I'm also finding more and more forks of the original miner which are basically used to improve hashing rates. Which is fine, I have no problems with that, but I'm becoming confused on which miner I should actually use.

So could anybody give me a hand?

Right now I'm mining x11 at 3.3Mh/s using a .bat file config, which is below.

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k x11mod -o stratum+tcp://useast.blackcoinpool.com:3333 -u Lizzardis.1 -p -I 16 --auto-fan --temp-target 75 --temp-cutoff 90 -g 2 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 22400

Right now I'm using this mod which is linked in the OP of this thread, and I'm getting those results above.

Can anyone give me any idea of which SG or CGMiner I can use in order to squeeze out more hashes? And also how I can tweak my configurations to do the same?

I'd appreciate any help at all!

Thread concurrency is not used with X11. I have 290X's, so my advice may be a little off, but try playing with Xintensities around 64 or 68 (for some reason even numbers consistently work better for me). Also reduce worksize to 64. You can also try bumping up your clockrates modestly until you start seeing GPU's go sick/dead. I'm using SGminer 5 builds that I think came from badman (backtrack in this thread and see his link in his signature). I'm thinking you should be able to get to around 4.8 MH once optimized (I get just over 6.0 with a 290X and I think a 280X is about 80% as fast), faster if someone shares some of the new kernels that people are boasting about here....

My best advise is to backtrack in this thread and take note of the configs people report success with. Try the various hamsci settings and so forth one at a time keeping track of the results each time.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Getting above 5.7MH/s stable with my 280X on X11, using a kernel I heavily modified.
290X is getting 6.5MH/s at (almost) stock clocks, that is, 1000/1500.
7950 pulling around 4.87MH/s at 1120/1500.
And 270X getting 3.53MH/s at 1150/1500.

when I used to optimize x11 some months ago I used to get around 6Mh/s with the r9 290.
then it became unprofitable...

I've really just started a few days ago, IIRC. I'm scooping up the easy hash increases, then I'll see what else can be improved.
newbie
Activity: 106
Merit: 0
Anybody fancy giving a new ATI miner a hand with some configurations?

I've recently moved over from Nvidia after my 750 Ti basically blew up on me, so I have an R9 280x now.

I'm trying to get to grips with the original cgminer, but then I'm also finding more and more forks of the original miner which are basically used to improve hashing rates. Which is fine, I have no problems with that, but I'm becoming confused on which miner I should actually use.

So could anybody give me a hand?

Right now I'm mining x11 at 3.3Mh/s using a .bat file config, which is below.

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k x11mod -o stratum+tcp://useast.blackcoinpool.com:3333 -u Lizzardis.1 -p -I 16 --auto-fan --temp-target 75 --temp-cutoff 90 -g 2 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 22400

Right now I'm using this mod which is linked in the OP of this thread, and I'm getting those results above.

Can anyone give me any idea of which SG or CGMiner I can use in order to squeeze out more hashes? And also how I can tweak my configurations to do the same?

I'd appreciate any help at all!
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1036
Holy shit! I should have tried two GPU threads on my 290X ages ago! Getting 7.6MH/s X11 at 1000/1500!  Cheesy
Am I to understand you're using a public version of SGMiner 5, but with modded kernels that have not been released yet? Last time I ran X11 I was getting 6-6.1 Mhash with my 290X's, so those are impressive numbers.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Have there been any new miners forks or updates of existing miner software, since the last one that boosted X11 and X13 by a lot? It's so hard to keep track of anything in crypto nowadays.
I also would like to know anymore updates to X11

Getting above 5.7MH/s stable with my 280X on X11, using a kernel I heavily modified.
290X is getting 6.5MH/s at (almost) stock clocks, that is, 1000/1500.
7950 pulling around 4.87MH/s at 1120/1500.
And 270X getting 3.53MH/s at 1150/1500.
Src?

Not posted, but here is proof (nsfw as always): https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/x11localrigwolf.png
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000

Getting above 5.7MH/s stable with my 280X on X11, using a kernel I heavily modified.
290X is getting 6.5MH/s at (almost) stock clocks, that is, 1000/1500.
7950 pulling around 4.87MH/s at 1120/1500.
And 270X getting 3.53MH/s at 1150/1500.
How about power consumption?
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Getting above 5.7MH/s stable with my 280X on X11, using a kernel I heavily modified.
290X is getting 6.5MH/s at (almost) stock clocks, that is, 1000/1500.
7950 pulling around 4.87MH/s at 1120/1500.
And 270X getting 3.53MH/s at 1150/1500.

when I used to optimize x11 some months ago I used to get around 6Mh/s with the r9 290.
then it became unprofitable...
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Have there been any new miners forks or updates of existing miner software, since the last one that boosted X11 and X13 by a lot? It's so hard to keep track of anything in crypto nowadays.
I also would like to know anymore updates to X11

Getting above 5.7MH/s stable with my 280X on X11, using a kernel I heavily modified.
290X is getting 6.5MH/s at (almost) stock clocks, that is, 1000/1500.
7950 pulling around 4.87MH/s at 1120/1500.
And 270X getting 3.53MH/s at 1150/1500.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
Have there been any new miners forks or updates of existing miner software, since the last one that boosted X11 and X13 by a lot? It's so hard to keep track of anything in crypto nowadays.
I also would like to know anymore updates to X11

Getting above 5.7MH/s stable with my 280X on X11, using a kernel I heavily modified.
290X is getting 6.5MH/s at (almost) stock clocks, that is, 1000/1500.
7950 pulling around 4.87MH/s at 1120/1500.
And 270X getting 3.53MH/s at 1150/1500.
Src?
full member
Activity: 347
Merit: 100
Guys

I have 2 gpu 280x
It was working good but lately i get my gpu 1 OFF
what's wrong, i didn't change anything
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
has anybody had success having the benefits of lasybears x11mod/x13mod kernels having together with sgminer v5 which supports algo switching without restarting the miner?
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
Have there been any new miners forks or updates of existing miner software, since the last one that boosted X11 and X13 by a lot? It's so hard to keep track of anything in crypto nowadays.
I also would like to know anymore updates to X11
I've had some decent luck using the SGMINER 5 daily from NiceHash.
full member
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
Have there been any new miners forks or updates of existing miner software, since the last one that boosted X11 and X13 by a lot? It's so hard to keep track of anything in crypto nowadays.
I also would like to know anymore updates to X11
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
I'm getting 30 kh/s per 7970 on x13...

My config is:
-k x13mod -g 1 --gpu-engine=1000 --gpu-memclock=1400 --thread-concurrency=8192 --lookup-gap=2 -w 256

If anyone can help me, thatd be nice.

You should use more "g" and also it looks like you are not setting intensity.
-g 2 gives me 20 kh/s and I have -I 15 set. I forgot to paste that in.

Edit: NVM the problem was that the intensity was set too high

Try g 2, I 17, w 64.
My 7970 gets 2.4MH/s, with core/memory = 800/1000MHz.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I'm getting 30 kh/s per 7970 on x13...

My config is:
-k x13mod -g 1 --gpu-engine=1000 --gpu-memclock=1400 --thread-concurrency=8192 --lookup-gap=2 -w 256

If anyone can help me, thatd be nice.

You should use more "g" and also it looks like you are not setting intensity.
-g 2 gives me 20 kh/s and I have -I 15 set. I forgot to paste that in.

Edit: NVM the problem was that the intensity was set too high
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I'm getting 30 kh/s per 7970 on x13...

My config is:
-k x13mod -g 1 --gpu-engine=1000 --gpu-memclock=1400 --thread-concurrency=8192 --lookup-gap=2 -w 256

If anyone can help me, thatd be nice.

You should use more "g" and also it looks like you are not setting intensity.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I'm getting 30 kh/s per 7970 on x13...

My config is:
-k x13mod -g 1 --gpu-engine=1000 --gpu-memclock=1400 --thread-concurrency=8192 --lookup-gap=2 -w 256

If anyone can help me, thatd be nice.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
Some BAMT with this new x11mod miner? PLZzz  Embarrassed

You can add Sgminer 5 to bamt. Look on the reddit page there should be instructions there. If you need help pm me.

Chad
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
Have there been any new miners forks or updates of existing miner software, since the last one that boosted X11 and X13 by a lot? It's so hard to keep track of anything in crypto nowadays.
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 250
Can I get more than ~5MH/s for r9 290 and more than ~4,3 MH/s for 280x  x11 ??
Pages:
Jump to: