What are these "No such host is known" ?
Topic: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer) - page 68. (Read 351557 times)
May 26, 2014, 12:33:09 PM
I'm getting a lot of some weird errors, though 280x is doing 3.2Mh/s... downloaded binary from page 13...
What are these "No such host is known" ?
What are these "No such host is known" ?
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
May 26, 2014, 12:30:07 PM
For Marucoin, after porting the x11 kernel to x13, I get ~750kh/s with my 5850 at 715/995. But the ordinary marucoin kernel fails to compile oddly enough.
May 26, 2014, 12:28:47 PM
On Windows I get 4.1 Mh/s with each of my 2 R9 290 non X, on a test run more than 6 hours.
That's awesome. I've been tracking X11 hash rates for the new miner and you're up in 290x territory.
that hashrate is for 290x and not for 290 non x.
May 26, 2014, 12:22:59 PM
On Windows I get 4.1 Mh/s with each of my 2 R9 290 non X, on a test run more than 6 hours.
That's awesome. I've been tracking X11 hash rates for the new miner and you're up in 290x territory.
May 26, 2014, 12:16:19 PM
On Windows I get 4.1 Mh/s with each of my 2 R9 290 non X, on a test run more than 6 hours.
Thank you!
Thank you!
which driver and can you post your settings?
May 26, 2014, 12:10:18 PM
On Windows I get 4.1 Mh/s with each of my 2 R9 290 non X, on a test run more than 6 hours.
Thank you!
http://i.imgur.com/QVVijuK.jpg
Thank you!
http://i.imgur.com/QVVijuK.jpg
May 26, 2014, 11:42:51 AM
I get 3.5MH/s with Gigabyte R9 280x 
How much DRK I get a day at 10,50MH/s?
How much DRK I get a day at 10,50MH/s?
May 26, 2014, 11:29:38 AM
This is great! I've noticed HUGE gains in my cards!
my 7770 and running over 1.1! and my 6950's @ 1.9 Thanks!
my 7770 and running over 1.1! and my 6950's @ 1.9 Thanks!
HD 7770 = 1.370 Mh/s (76% up)
"vector" : "1",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"gpu-engine" : "1200",
"gpu-memclock" : "1425",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"thread-concurrency" : "6016",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"xintensity" : "200",
Thanks, not far off from what I had but it peaks @ 1.1 Mh/s It's running with multiple cards so that could be the reason.
May 26, 2014, 11:19:49 AM
Love the new updated windows binaries from Elun! Getting 2.2MH/s (up from 1.95) now with my 270's (x & non-x) with the following settings:
Temps 60*C & lower (although I do have a 20" box fan under them)...
Code:
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-vddc": "1.150",
"gpu-fan" : "75-100",
"gpu-engine" : "1200",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "88",
"worksize" : "128",
"shaders" : "1280",
"thread-concurrency" : "5121",
"xintensity" : "512",
"lookup-gap": "2",
"vectors": "1"
Temps 60*C & lower (although I do have a 20" box fan under them)...
May 26, 2014, 11:13:07 AM
Anyone has a 7870? Can some one tell me some settings, I actually reach 1900kHash max
d0 - 280x @3.493 Mh/s
d1 - 7870 @2.200 Mh/s
d2 - 7850 @1.625 Mh/s
d3 - 5670 @0.406 Mh/s
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"device" : "0,1,2,3",
"kernel" : "x11mod,x11mod,x11mod,darkcoin",
"vector" : "1",
"intensity" : "22,20,20,15",
"worksize" : "128,128,128,256",
"lookup-gap" : "2,2,2,2",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2,1,1",
"shaders" : "2048,1280,1024,400",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,8192,5120,1920",
"gpu-engine" : "1070-1170,1100-1200,860-1200,980",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500,1200,1200,950",
May 26, 2014, 11:11:59 AM
Anyone has a 7870? Can some one tell me some settings, I actually reach 1900kHash max
I get 2.1MH/s with 7870 pitcairn and november's version with
-w 64 -g 4 --thread-concurrency 6144 --gpu-engine 1200 --gpu-memclock 1250 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-vddc 1.165 -I 15
My settings are:
"intensity" : "16",
"vector" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "2"
It take 150w from the wall with a 3570k to 4,4Ghz
GPU CLOCK 1080Mhz mem 1250 and VDDC is 1,1v
May 26, 2014, 11:09:09 AM
Anyone has a 7870? Can some one tell me some settings, I actually reach 1900kHash max
I get 2.1MH/s with 7870 pitcairn and november's version with
-w 64 -g 4 --thread-concurrency 6144 --gpu-engine 1200 --gpu-memclock 1250 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-vddc 1.165 -I 15
May 26, 2014, 11:08:22 AM
HD7850:
This version - 1.73MH/s
-w 64 -g 4 --thread-concurrency 6144 --gpu-engine 1200 --gpu-memclock 1250 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-vddc 1.165 -I 15
This version - 1.73MH/s
-w 64 -g 4 --thread-concurrency 6144 --gpu-engine 1200 --gpu-memclock 1250 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-vddc 1.165 -I 15
I also get 1.73MH/s on my 7850's with this exact config and November's version
I also used this exact config on my 7870 pitcairn and get 2.1MH/s, too lazy to test other settings right now
Better, but still sucks compared to Nvidia especially for power usage.
May 26, 2014, 11:03:06 AM
Anyone has a 7870? Can some one tell me some settings, I actually reach 1900kHash max
May 26, 2014, 11:00:49 AM
X
-I 18 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500 -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192
That gives me 3.345 Mh/s running in closed case at 70 to 72F
I think I read somewhere that if you put i=18 to 280x you will fry them.
( same as if you put more then i=20 to 290 cards )
everybody can correct me if I'm wrong.
280x and 7970ghz running for over 11 hrs
Code:
"intensity" : "20,20",
"xintensity" : "0,0",
"rawintensity" : "0,0",
"worksize" : "256,256",
"kernel" : "x11mod,x11mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2,2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,8192",
"shaders" : "0,0",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2",
"gpu-engine" : "1150-1150,1150-1150",
"gpu-fan" : "100-100,100-100",
"gpu-memclock" : "1650,1650",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0,0",
"gpu-powertune" : "20,20",
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
May 26, 2014, 10:54:53 AM
Hey 5th, I know you posted a paste of the x11mod kernel before, but can you combine x11 mod with what you see different between marucoin.cl (http://pastebin.com/X97XdwU3) X13 algo and the standard darkcoin.cl?
The x11mod kernel is some 8000 lines of code the x13 kernel much much shorter, but less efficient. I wanted to see if we could optimize 11 of the 13 algorithms for upcoming use. X13 is basically X11 hamsi+fugue i think. So can we just smash the hamsi+fugue portion to bottom of the 8000 lines or what.
The x11mod kernel is huge, because it uses ALL .cl files in one file, that is why it's huge. Usually it's split and uses #include macros to include the rest of the .cl dependencies, but the 2% miner guy decided to merge it. However, you are correct in the assumption that the speed improvement might work for X13 too. But I will need some good pool to test. The x11mod kernel is some 8000 lines of code the x13 kernel much much shorter, but less efficient. I wanted to see if we could optimize 11 of the 13 algorithms for upcoming use. X13 is basically X11 hamsi+fugue i think. So can we just smash the hamsi+fugue portion to bottom of the 8000 lines or what.
May 26, 2014, 10:52:02 AM
This is great! I've noticed HUGE gains in my cards!
my 7770 and running over 1.1! and my 6950's @ 1.9 Thanks!
my 7770 and running over 1.1! and my 6950's @ 1.9 Thanks!
HD 7770 = 1.370 Mh/s (76% up)
"vector" : "1",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"gpu-engine" : "1200",
"gpu-memclock" : "1425",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"thread-concurrency" : "6016",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"xintensity" : "200",
May 26, 2014, 10:51:13 AM
Yeah sure I don't mind doing that.
How do you redirect to output file? I've tried to understand the piping thing in the readme.MD but failed.
Regardless, I think the most important stat is the WU/m.
A good average for me is WU: 0.057/m, anybody else seeing any improvements over +1/-1 of that over the course of a few hours?
How do you redirect to output file? I've tried to understand the piping thing in the readme.MD but failed.
Regardless, I think the most important stat is the WU/m.
A good average for me is WU: 0.057/m, anybody else seeing any improvements over +1/-1 of that over the course of a few hours?
That is about right for my 290x's... this is over the course of two hours.
Code:
"intensity" : "19,19",
"xintensity" : "0,0",
"rawintensity" : "0,0",
"worksize" : "128,128",
"kernel" : "x11mod,x11mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2,2",
"thread-concurrency" : "14080,14080",
"shaders" : "0,0",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2",
"gpu-engine" : "1020-1020,1050-1050",
"gpu-fan" : "100-100,100-100",
"gpu-memclock" : "1450,1500",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0,0",
"gpu-powertune" : "20,20",
I have also had some issues with a few sick cards (290x,280x and 7970ghz and 7970 vanilla) and I had to dial back the overclocks on them slightly but all seems to be well for now. One thing to note is when the cards in question did go sick only a hard boot (turn computer off instead of reboot) would reinitialize the card.
May 26, 2014, 10:50:53 AM
Only the 290X Tri-X OC Cards falling DEAD with this miner. Nothing physically wrong with them. Hard clocking to 1040/1300 [box-stock] will report in.
Maybe 5th can compile a better version, or a version compiled for SSEv2 or something above a Pentium MMX. Error the miner gives is "suggest hard hang" then I don't have GPUs on restart because that usually always crashes the entire miner; I'd rather run at half or 2/3 capacity.
I used this steps to build:Maybe 5th can compile a better version, or a version compiled for SSEv2 or something above a Pentium MMX. Error the miner gives is "suggest hard hang" then I don't have GPUs on restart because that usually always crashes the entire miner; I'd rather run at half or 2/3 capacity.
Code:
autoreconf -fvi
CFLAGS="-O2 -msse2" ./configure
make
strip sgminer.exe
May 26, 2014, 10:39:47 AM
X
-I 18 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500 -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192
That gives me 3.345 Mh/s running in closed case at 70 to 72F
I think I read somewhere that if you put i=18 to 280x you will fry them.
( same as if you put more then i=20 to 290 cards )
everybody can correct me if I'm wrong.
Don't see how it would be any different then any other coin/algo. You will simple get invalid results, crash the driver or crash/bluescreen the computer if you push it to hard. Assuming temps are still in a valid range.
Jump to: