Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer) - page 77. (Read 351545 times)

member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
I have little more hash but only on 1 card, 7 others are the same but it is great.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
actually doing more 50kh/s each card with this miner than the 2% one.
totally reccomended!



before was 3208 each card (toxic 280x).
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
This miner is so fake. I have the same hash as with regular miner, 2% miner gives me 40% more. Tried lots of diferent setings and it's all the same. Went back to 2% miner.
My bad. I was tired last night and i was using darkcoin kernel insted of x11mod. Miner is 100% working and the best thing is: no more coil whine  Wink
Recomended!
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 640
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
Where in sgminer are the value ranges for the arguments defined?
Can't find it. I'd like to increase the max value for GPU threads.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
in this version marucoin kernel was removed why? the old sgminer can run it just fine
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 640
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
Try fiddling with worksize, i.e reducing it.
Tried 32, 48, 64, 96, 128, 192. The best result was 2.74 MH/s at --worksize 64.
i have same problem by my 290, it seems that improvement is not support for 290s cards

best i can get is 2.9mhs

Sounds weird and took me a while, but many GPU threads seem to work well on 290s with this kernel.
This is what I run now on 290 TRI Xs under PIMP, gives me about 3,4 MH.
It crashes sometimes on startup, but once it runs its rather stable.

There seems to be a limit of 10 threads in sgminer, wouldn't it sound legit to have 11 threads then?

"intensity" : "15",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "1",
"thread-concurrency" : "25601",
"expiry" : "1",
"auto-fan" : true,
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "10",
"vectors" : "1",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"gpu-fan" : "40-100",
"gpu-engine" : "1055",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",


Thanks for the tip, which version are you running, the one compiled by RRT5ON? Also what clocks do you have set on your 290 Tri-x? And finally which drivers please Cheesy

Its Catalyst 13.25.5 and PIMP/Debian 3.12.9-1
I compiled it right on the rig. Clockspeed is 1055 more or less. I have a batch of cards which makes it only to 1025 though.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
Quote
1. Do not use intensity higher than 15.

What are the upper limits on "X" and Raw?
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
good job, tested one 7950

2% ver 2,735 Mh
Code:
-k darkcoin -g 1 --thread-concurrency 8192 --intensity 18 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1250 --gpu-powertune 10

-X11mod 2,730 Mh
Code:
-k x11mod -I 15 -w 256 --gpu-threads 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1250 --gpu-powertune 20

Tried these settings on my Sapphire 7950 and didn't work. So I'm running it 'as is' right now, with the provided config (changed pool ofcourse).

I'm getting 2.3 - 2.4 Mh/s vs. 1.8 Mh/s normally Smiley


What I do notice is that my card runs at 59 degrees now vs. 71 before. Does that mean I should be able to push it more?
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
Yes, but I'm using a .bat file to start my miner.
Do I have to use .conf file to start it?

no you can start your miner with desktop shortcut of sgminer.exe with a string(like in a bat), i find it more easy imho, in the end they are the same thing..



Ok, but when I start my miner with .bat file and the -k x11mod I get the following error
sgminer.exe: -k: Invalid parameter to set_kernel

If I set -k darkcoin it works perfect!

that's strange you have downloaded the miner in this thread right?

Yes, I have downloaded it from www.cryptomining-blog.com
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Thanks I got it compiled for pimp and it works. But for some reason I have a slightly lower hashrate with my 280x cards compared to the 2% version. With the 2% version I can reach upto 3.3MH/s and with this version upto 3.1 MH/s. I tried tweaking lots of parameters but can't get it even close to 3.3 MH/s... It might have to do with the i15 setting compared to i19 on the 2% version?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
I can confirm a yield increase - Can this be adapted for Quark and clones?

i'd definitely tip an encourage other to also.
NRD
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Try fiddling with worksize, i.e reducing it.
Tried 32, 48, 64, 96, 128, 192. The best result was 2.74 MH/s at --worksize 64.
i have same problem by my 290, it seems that improvement is not support for 290s cards

best i can get is 2.9mhs

Sounds weird and took me a while, but many GPU threads seem to work well on 290s with this kernel.
This is what I run now on 290 TRI Xs under PIMP, gives me about 3,4 MH.
It crashes sometimes on startup, but once it runs its rather stable.

There seems to be a limit of 10 threads in sgminer, wouldn't it sound legit to have 11 threads then?

"intensity" : "15",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "1",
"thread-concurrency" : "25601",
"expiry" : "1",
"auto-fan" : true,
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "10",
"vectors" : "1",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"gpu-fan" : "40-100",
"gpu-engine" : "1055",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",


Thanks for the tip, which version are you running, the one compiled by RRT5ON? Also what clocks do you have set on your 290 Tri-x? And finally which drivers please Cheesy
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
I noticed a couple of small problems with the windows version from here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6911769

The reported Diff stuff is displayed like this "Diff 0.000/0.000"
My normal sgminer actually has a figure here, you can see it also in this post : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6927343

Also for some reason, in CGRemote 1.1.0.1 the algorithm is reported as Scrypt in the Mining Farm list, where before it was listed as "X11"
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 640
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
Try fiddling with worksize, i.e reducing it.
Tried 32, 48, 64, 96, 128, 192. The best result was 2.74 MH/s at --worksize 64.
i have same problem by my 290, it seems that improvement is not support for 290s cards

best i can get is 2.9mhs

Sounds weird and took me a while, but many GPU threads seem to work well on 290s with this kernel.
This is what I run now on 290 TRI Xs under PIMP, gives me about 3,4 MH.
It crashes sometimes on startup, but once it runs its rather stable.

There seems to be a limit of 10 threads in sgminer, wouldn't it sound legit to have 11 threads then?

"intensity" : "15",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "1",
"thread-concurrency" : "25601",
"expiry" : "1",
"auto-fan" : true,
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "10",
"vectors" : "1",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"gpu-fan" : "40-100",
"gpu-engine" : "1055",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
hero member
Activity: 925
Merit: 1000
So I made some experiments on my rig and now I think I can be satisfied with the results. When I was running the modified SGMiner previously I was getting 2,6 Mh on 280x and 1,5 Mh on 290. Now I'm getting this:



I did following:

1) Uninstalled completely AMD Catalyst driver 13.12 with Driver Uninstaller in Safe Mode -> http://www.guru3d.com/files_details/display_driver_uninstaller_download.html
2) Installed latest Catalyst 14.4
3) And this is my config for following cards 2xR280x (MSI Gaming) and 1xR290 (Sapphire reference):

-------------------------------------------
del *.bin
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1

sgminer --kernel x11mod -o stratum+tcp://useast.blackcoinpool.com:3333 -u UserName.1 -p x -I 15,15,15 -w 128,128,256 --thread-concurrency 8192,8192,24550 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500,1250 --gpu-engine 1090,1090,1000 --gpu-fan 60 --gpu-powertune 20 -g 2,2,2
-------------------------------------------

I hope this helps somebody. It would be really fine to optimize for R290, I would expect at least 3,5Mh.

I am using this miner from that November guy -> https://www.dropbox.com/s/skv74wv378h5qnl/sgminerx11.rar
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
5870

engine 925
memory 1250
intensity 15
threads 1
worksize 128

i can only get 1.8 with this miner, had 1.95 with the 2% one.
sr. member
Activity: 300
Merit: 250
4mnth old Miner :-)
Try fiddling with worksize, i.e reducing it.
Tried 32, 48, 64, 96, 128, 192. The best result was 2.74 MH/s at --worksize 64.
i have same problem by my 290, it seems that improvement is not support for 290s cards

best i can get is 2.9mhs
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
Yes, but I'm using a .bat file to start my miner.
Do I have to use .conf file to start it?

no you can start your miner with desktop shortcut of sgminer.exe with a string(like in a bat), i find it more easy imho, in the end they are the same thing..



Ok, but when I start my miner with .bat file and the -k x11mod I get the following error
sgminer.exe: -k: Invalid parameter to set_kernel

If I set -k darkcoin it works perfect!

that's strange you have downloaded the miner in this thread right?
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
Yes, but I'm using a .bat file to start my miner.
Do I have to use .conf file to start it?

no you can start your miner with desktop shortcut of sgminer.exe with a string(like in a bat), i find it more easy imho, in the end they are the same thing..



Ok, but when I start my miner with .bat file and the -k x11mod I get the following error
sgminer.exe: -k: Invalid parameter to set_kernel

If I set -k darkcoin it works perfect!
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
Yes, but I'm using a .bat file to start my miner.
Do I have to use .conf file to start it?

no you can start your miner with desktop shortcut of sgminer.exe with a string(like in a bat), i find it more easy imho, in the end they are the same thing..

Pages:
Jump to: