Topic: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer) - page 82. (Read 351531 times)
May 24, 2014, 10:41:18 AM
looking foward for this...seems nice
May 24, 2014, 10:38:36 AM
I'm testing on older AMD cards, ie 5870,6950,6970,etc... Using -k x11mod and I=15....
I'm getting 1.8~1.9mh/s, but the shares are -0.0000/0.0000.
Original hash was 1.1~1.2.
It does seem the coding still need some tweaking to work right.
You got that right. I'm getting 1.8~1.9mh/s, but the shares are -0.0000/0.0000.
Original hash was 1.1~1.2.
It does seem the coding still need some tweaking to work right.
It does hash and find work, but doesn't submit shares....
May 24, 2014, 10:31:10 AM
-I 18 - 20 causes the AMD drivers to crash
yep... they recommend nto going higher than -I 15
Hoping this gets tuned up a bit better. Seems just a bit slower than the 2% fee scuzzball
May 24, 2014, 10:23:32 AM
-I 18 - 20 causes the AMD drivers to crash
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
May 24, 2014, 10:20:37 AM
i'm not getting any speed increase (2.1 mh/s 280x & 7970) over the normal sph-sgminer with darkcoin kernel on windows 7 64 bit.
The 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
Did you select the x11mod kernel? Sounds like you omitted -k x11modThe 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
Your version with settings : -k x11mod -I 15 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-powertune 20
2% version with settings: -I 20 -w 128 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --thread-concurrency 8128 --gpu-powertune 20
I have tried different parameters but nothing changes
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
May 24, 2014, 10:19:13 AM
I'm testing on older AMD cards, ie 5870,6950,6970,etc... Using -k x11mod and I=15....
I'm getting 1.8~1.9mh/s, but the shares are -0.0000/0.0000.
Original hash was 1.1~1.2.
It does seem the coding still need some tweaking to work right.
You got that right. I'm getting 1.8~1.9mh/s, but the shares are -0.0000/0.0000.
Original hash was 1.1~1.2.
It does seem the coding still need some tweaking to work right.
May 24, 2014, 10:18:57 AM
i'm not getting any speed increase (2.1 mh/s 280x & 7970) over the normal sph-sgminer with darkcoin kernel on windows 7 64 bit.
The 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
Did you select the x11mod kernel? Sounds like you omitted -k x11modThe 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
Your version with settings : -k x11mod -I 15 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-powertune 20
2% version with settings: -I 20 -w 128 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --thread-concurrency 8128 --gpu-powertune 20
I have tried different parameters but nothing changes
May 24, 2014, 10:16:23 AM
I'm testing on older AMD cards, ie 5870,6950,6970,etc... Using -k x11mod, I=15, w=128, gpu thread=4, TC=8000, power tune=+20%, 880core/1350mem, lookup gap=2....
I'm getting 1.8~1.9mh/s on a HD6950 1GB, but the shares are -0.0000 and diff is 0.000/0.000 .
Original hash was 1.1~1.2.
It does seem the coding still needs some tweaking to work right.
I'm getting 1.8~1.9mh/s on a HD6950 1GB, but the shares are -0.0000 and diff is 0.000/0.000 .
Original hash was 1.1~1.2.
It does seem the coding still needs some tweaking to work right.
May 24, 2014, 10:14:18 AM
I'll be unavailable till 20:00GMT.
Please provide your settings and hashrates )
Please provide your settings and hashrates )
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
May 24, 2014, 10:04:24 AM
i'm not getting any speed increase (2.1 mh/s 280x & 7970) over the normal sph-sgminer with darkcoin kernel on windows 7 64 bit.
The 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
Did you select the x11mod kernel? Sounds like you omitted -k x11mod The 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
May 24, 2014, 10:04:21 AM
i'm not getting any speed increase (2.1 mh/s 280x & 7970) over the normal sph-sgminer with darkcoin kernel on windows 7 64 bit.
The 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
The 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
--gpu-threads 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 15 --lookup-gap 2
you need intensity 15 for 3.15M/s, but the share value are all fucked up, they are negative, something wrong in the code
May 24, 2014, 10:03:12 AM
i'm not getting any speed increase (2.1 mh/s 280x & 7970) over the normal sph-sgminer with darkcoin kernel on windows 7 64 bit.
The 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
The 2% version speed was 3.1 mh/s for both cards
May 24, 2014, 09:59:10 AM
displayed best share is wrong, is negative, diff also is at 0.000, something in the type of digits in the code
i'm not a coder, but i'm curious what "sha256(pool->coinbase, pool->swork.cb_len, merkle_root);" does
This is not a my modification.
Maybe this code from cycle below...
Amazing, on Linux this works )
i've done some code in the past, but swork.cb_len, merkle_root i really don't know to what they refer
I identified and corrected the problem https://www.dropbox.com/s/skv74wv378h5qnl/sgminerx11.rar
The problem is the use of an unitialized variable as an index.
i.e
I applied a dirty fix by removing said IF sentence, simply because it's not needed for darkcoin.
The problem is the use of an unitialized variable as an index.
i.e
Code:
if (gpus[i].kernel == KL_FUGUECOIN || gpus[i].kernel == KL_GROESTLCOIN || gpus[i].kernel == KL_TWECOIN) {
sha256(pool->coinbase, pool->swork.cb_len, merkle_root);
}I applied a dirty fix by removing said IF sentence, simply because it's not needed for darkcoin.
i'm not a coder, but i'm curious what "sha256(pool->coinbase, pool->swork.cb_len, merkle_root);" does
Maybe this code from cycle below...
Amazing, on Linux this works )
i've done some code in the past, but swork.cb_len, merkle_root i really don't know to what they refer
May 24, 2014, 09:58:13 AM
Windows build report: shares with diff -0.000 and speed jumps from 2.1 to 2.6 up and down, up and down.
May 24, 2014, 09:56:57 AM
I identified and corrected the problem https://www.dropbox.com/s/skv74wv378h5qnl/sgminerx11.rar
The problem is the use of an unitialized variable as an index.
i.e
I applied a dirty fix by removing said IF sentence, simply because it's not needed for darkcoin.
The problem is the use of an unitialized variable as an index.
i.e
Code:
if (gpus[i].kernel == KL_FUGUECOIN || gpus[i].kernel == KL_GROESTLCOIN || gpus[i].kernel == KL_TWECOIN) {
sha256(pool->coinbase, pool->swork.cb_len, merkle_root);
}I applied a dirty fix by removing said IF sentence, simply because it's not needed for darkcoin.
i'm not a coder, but i'm curious what "sha256(pool->coinbase, pool->swork.cb_len, merkle_root);" does
Maybe this code from cycle below...
Amazing, on Linux this works )
May 24, 2014, 09:54:12 AM
I identified and corrected the problem https://www.dropbox.com/s/skv74wv378h5qnl/sgminerx11.rar
The problem is the use of an unitialized variable as an index.
i.e
I applied a dirty fix by removing said IF sentence, simply because it's not needed for darkcoin.
The problem is the use of an unitialized variable as an index.
i.e
Code:
if (gpus[i].kernel == KL_FUGUECOIN || gpus[i].kernel == KL_GROESTLCOIN || gpus[i].kernel == KL_TWECOIN) {
sha256(pool->coinbase, pool->swork.cb_len, merkle_root);
}I applied a dirty fix by removing said IF sentence, simply because it's not needed for darkcoin.
i'm not a coder, but i'm curious what "sha256(pool->coinbase, pool->swork.cb_len, merkle_root);" does
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
May 24, 2014, 09:39:27 AM
I identified and corrected the problem https://www.dropbox.com/s/skv74wv378h5qnl/sgminerx11.rar
The problem is the use of an unitialized variable as an index.
i.e
I applied a dirty fix by removing said IF sentence, simply because it's not needed for darkcoin.
The problem is the use of an unitialized variable as an index.
i.e
Code:
if (gpus[i].kernel == KL_FUGUECOIN || gpus[i].kernel == KL_GROESTLCOIN || gpus[i].kernel == KL_TWECOIN) {
sha256(pool->coinbase, pool->swork.cb_len, merkle_root);
}I applied a dirty fix by removing said IF sentence, simply because it's not needed for darkcoin.
May 24, 2014, 09:34:32 AM
I am looking into the issue.
Unfortunately, I haven't programming experience on windows.I used sources from https://github.com/Atrides/sph-sgminer
Modded files
configure.in
ocl.{h,c}
driver-opencl.c
findnonce.h
miner.h
sgminer.c
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
May 24, 2014, 09:27:24 AM
I am looking into the issue.
May 24, 2014, 09:20:56 AM
Won't start, win7 x64. Compiles, sees pools, then stops every time. Tried changing various parameters but same result every time.
Jump to: