Author

Topic: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet - page 115. (Read 268553 times)

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
Seams like after missing the DRK train, Bryce also missed the XC train. What a dick:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 26s

X11Coin premine info removed from ANN thread. Trade wisely.

Dev, please put the premine info back to the thread. People will trust this coin more if you put it back.

* bryce is still a douche though.

Bryce keeps on bitching:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 2m

@XCplatform @DrasticRaven @rodrigohenrik There's nothing stopping anyone from farming identified nodes for traffic data.


the xnode protocol is encrypted and for additional protection it can be run over Tor


Of course, he would know that if he had just asked instead of being his always presumptuous asshat self...
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Biggest chinese Multipool need Bonus

i know a guy who run the biggest chinese Multipool,i am contact with him now,

i am trying to convince him to set a Multipool for XC coin!

how many bonus do we have for a big Multipool?

thanks


here is the two biggest multipool in china which both runned by that guy, you can check this

1 http://x11.ltc1btc.com/  more than 80G X11 hashpow

2 http://www.ltc1btc.com/ more than 25G scrypt hashpow



great contact him

he may add us 10 ten hours later.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Seams like after missing the DRK train, Bryce also missed the XC train. What a dick:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 26s

X11Coin premine info removed from ANN thread. Trade wisely.

Dev, please put the premine info back to the thread. People will trust this coin more if you put it back.

* bryce is still a douche though.

Bryce keeps on bitching:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 2m

@XCplatform @DrasticRaven @rodrigohenrik There's nothing stopping anyone from farming identified nodes for traffic data.


the xnode protocol is encrypted and for additional protection it can be run over Tor
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
Biggest chinese Multipool need Bonus

i know a guy who run the biggest chinese Multipool,i am contact with him now,

i am trying to convince him to set a Multipool for XC coin!

how many bonus do we have for a big Multipool?

thanks


here is the two biggest multipool in china which both runned by that guy, you can check this

1 http://x11.ltc1btc.com/  more than 80G X11 hashpow

2 http://www.ltc1btc.com/ more than 25G scrypt hashpow



great contact him
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
Twitter: @FedKassad
Seams like after missing the DRK train, Bryce also missed the XC train. What a dick:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 26s

X11Coin premine info removed from ANN thread. Trade wisely.

Dev, please put the premine info back to the thread. People will trust this coin more if you put it back.

* bryce is still a douche though.

Bryce keeps on bitching:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 2m

@XCplatform @DrasticRaven @rodrigohenrik There's nothing stopping anyone from farming identified nodes for traffic data.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
ready for the crash ?


What crash  Grin You have 42 BTC buy wall on Criptsy...so silly
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
i think XC premine is the only honest premine for all history of altcoins. Devs can make many cool things for this 99k XC Wink

Multipool is a choice!
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
so how many XCs required to be xnode ? Still on vote ? 100 would be great
sr. member
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
Seams like after missing the DRK train, Bryce also missed the XC train. What a dick:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 26s

X11Coin premine info removed from ANN thread. Trade wisely.

Dev, please put the premine info back to the thread. People will trust this coin more if you put it back.

* bryce is still a douche though.

It's there. It was only gone briefly while dev was updating op.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
i think XC premine is the only honest premine for all history of altcoins. Devs can make many cool things for this 99k XC Wink
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Seams like after missing the DRK train, Bryce also missed the XC train. What a dick:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 26s

X11Coin premine info removed from ANN thread. Trade wisely.

Dev, please put the premine info back to the thread. People will trust this coin more if you put it back.

* bryce is still a douche though.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 255
Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height. Smiley

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited... Cheesy

Dev, as many new members are entering the community, I think now would be a good time to state clearly answers to the following questions:

1) How is XC's anonymous transfer superior to DRK's?
2) How are Xnodes superior to DRK's masternodes?
3) How soon can we expect Xnode implementation into the wallets?
4) Can you explain how this will all relate to your "block chain 2.0" project?

Also, I think it would be a good idea to add answers to these questions (but maybe without the DRK comparisons, your call) in the OP so new people don't have to keep filtering through the many pages.  This will help people more readily see why XC is currently the most undervalued, yet attractive altcoin on the market.  Thanks

+1 to all of this.  And I agree -- I think it would be a good idea to organize this information for people to see in the OP.

Some words from Dev:

I wanted to provide some more answers about the decentralized anonymous solution and how it will work
100XC to 1000XC's Required (#'s still being vetted)
Any client having the required XC's can enable xnode option (windows, mac & linux wallets)
xnodes will charge a fee which will be deducted from the transaction and kept in the local wallet << incentive based >>
no masternode or supernode required to communicate xnodes to clients
fully decentralized
Hope that answers all the questions, the majority of the code is already in the wallet and I expect a release supporting these features as outlined above to be available for testing in 3 weeks or less

http://imgur.com/YhU6uNz  <- network flow
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
New Wallet for Mac is fine also - but old GUI  Embarrassed No ...I won't complain, glad to have - cosmetics can come later!
full member
Activity: 208
Merit: 100
While we wait, what program do you think ATC was talking about that still runs? My money is one of the p2p protocols like Kazzaa or emule. I dunno, I just got a feeling. Would love to know!
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
New wallet (win 7 64bit) works fine, thanks! Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 255
Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height. Smiley

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited... Cheesy

Dev, as many new members are entering the community, I think now would be a good time to state clearly answers to the following questions:

1) How is XC's anonymous transfer superior to DRK's?
2) How are Xnodes superior to DRK's masternodes?
3) How soon can we expect Xnode implementation into the wallets?
4) Can you explain how this will all relate to your "block chain 2.0" project?

Also, I think it would be a good idea to add answers to these questions (but maybe without the DRK comparisons, your call) in the OP so new people don't have to keep filtering through the many pages.  This will help people more readily see why XC is currently the most undervalued, yet attractive altcoin on the market.  Thanks

+1 to all of this.  And I agree -- I think it would be a good idea to organize this information for people to see in the OP.

Some words from Dev:

I wanted to provide some more answers about the decentralized anonymous solution and how it will work
100XC to 1000XC's Required (#'s still being vetted)
Any client having the required XC's can enable xnode option (windows, mac & linux wallets)
xnodes will charge a fee which will be deducted from the transaction and kept in the local wallet << incentive based >>
no masternode or supernode required to communicate xnodes to clients
fully decentralized
Hope that answers all the questions, the majority of the code is already in the wallet and I expect a release supporting these features as outlined above to be available for testing in 3 weeks or less
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
Twitter: @FedKassad
Seams like after missing the DRK train, Bryce also missed the XC train. What a dick:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 26s

X11Coin premine info removed from ANN thread. Trade wisely.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Biggest chinese Multipool need Bonus

i know a guy who run the biggest chinese Multipool,i am contact with him now,

i am trying to convince him to set a Multipool for XC coin!

how many bonus do we have for a big Multipool?

thanks


here is the two biggest multipool in china which both runned by that guy, you can check this

1 http://x11.ltc1btc.com/  more than 80G X11 hashpow

2 http://www.ltc1btc.com/ more than 25G scrypt hashpow



hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height. Smiley

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited... Cheesy

Dev, as many new members are entering the community, I think now would be a good time to state clearly answers to the following questions:

1) How is XC's anonymous transfer superior to DRK's?
2) How are Xnodes superior to DRK's masternodes?
3) How soon can we expect Xnode implementation into the wallets?
4) Can you explain how this will all relate to your "block chain 2.0" project?

Also, I think it would be a good idea to add answers to these questions (but maybe without the DRK comparisons, your call) in the OP so new people don't have to keep filtering through the many pages.  This will help people more readily see why XC is currently the most undervalued, yet attractive altcoin on the market.  Thanks

+1 to all of this.  And I agree -- I think it would be a good idea to organize this information for people to see in the OP.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height. Smiley

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited... Cheesy

Thank You, for sticking with us and the awesome choice award.
Jump to: