stop shorting guys. Hold dont make the same mistakes 90% of the darkcoin early buyers did.
This +1
Check out the diminishing supply on Poloniex, people are heeding this advice.
Interesting only 29k left on Polo sell orders.
Topic: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet - page 152. (Read 268504 times)
May 26, 2014, 08:14:38 PM
This +1
Check out the diminishing supply on Poloniex, people are heeding this advice.
Interesting only 29k left on Polo sell orders.
May 26, 2014, 08:13:07 PM
stop shorting guys. Hold dont make the same mistakes 90% of the darkcoin early buyers did.
This +1
Check out the diminishing supply on Poloniex, people are heeding this advice.
May 26, 2014, 08:09:15 PM
stop shorting guys. Hold dont make the same mistakes 90% of the darkcoin early buyers did.
May 26, 2014, 08:08:58 PM
OK here are the issues I have with XC right now. I hope the dev can shine some light on these:
1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?
Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.
1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?
Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.
#1 - x30 seems pretty high, can you send me a screenshot?
#2 - Valid points and completely agree somewhat, yes the goal is move to a more decentralized solution leveraging the new encrypted application protocol layer
#3 - There are some key points, the mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...
OK thanks for this. #2 is a very important next step.
re #1 this is the transaction I was going off:
i don't know how exactly it works.
but at first it split 1 xc into 2 sending to 2 different address, then on the receiving address it show exactly as the screenshot.
it works. legit.
the receiving address is here XJnHZUaD95mdPDrjXJXLU7vuAC9PVcmomW
you can check on explorer
but at first it split 1 xc into 2 sending to 2 different address, then on the receiving address it show exactly as the screenshot.
it works. legit.
the receiving address is here XJnHZUaD95mdPDrjXJXLU7vuAC9PVcmomW
you can check on explorer
May 26, 2014, 08:07:13 PM
Man that UFH (Unidentified Flying Hashrate) is making mining really difficult.
500Ghs of Nethash and we can link only ~40Ghs to pools
But where is waldo?
500Ghs of Nethash and we can link only ~40Ghs to pools
But where is waldo?possibly a solomine setup..... i highly doubt FPGA as there is no proof such a thing is real yet.
May 26, 2014, 08:04:11 PM
Man that UFH (Unidentified Flying Hashrate) is making mining really difficult.
500Ghs of Nethash and we can link only ~40Ghs to pools But where is waldo?
500Ghs of Nethash and we can link only ~40Ghs to pools
But where is waldo? May 26, 2014, 08:03:48 PM
Last Call!! get your cheap coins now , while dark is frozen , cause when they unfreeze it ...IT Will be a black friday at wallmart. 
Wow, Aprrox. 1.5k BTC volume for XC @ Mintpal.
May 26, 2014, 08:02:49 PM
#3 - There are some key points, the mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...
Keep in mind you'll need a lot of DDOS protection and fault tolerance. Back in Feb-March, the first DRK's nodes were being DDOSed to "halt" anonymous transactions.
May 26, 2014, 08:02:14 PM
XC is now flying
May 26, 2014, 08:00:37 PM
So reducing the amount of total coins is gonna spike the price high and it should be stable. Less coins the better
Hold ur coins, this is just the start fellas.
Hold ur coins, this is just the start fellas.
May 26, 2014, 07:56:15 PM
OK here are the issues I have with XC right now. I hope the dev can shine some light on these:
1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?
Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.
1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?
Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.
#1 - x30 seems pretty high, can you send me a screenshot?
#2 - Valid points and completely agree somewhat, yes the goal is move to a more decentralized solution leveraging the new encrypted application protocol layer
#3 - There are some key points, the mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...
May 26, 2014, 07:38:40 PM
Can someone pass along some cudminer settings for XC? Would be much appreciated.
May 26, 2014, 07:38:13 PM
Last Call!! get your cheap coins now , while dark is frozen , cause when they unfreeze it ...IT Will be a black friday at wallmart.
May 26, 2014, 07:37:36 PM
love xc pls fly
May 26, 2014, 07:36:09 PM
OK here are the issues I have with XC right now. I hope the dev can shine some light on these:
1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?
Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.
1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?
Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.
May 26, 2014, 07:31:59 PM
May 26, 2014, 07:29:03 PM
The only problem with #XC on twitter is that you get a ton of cross country tweets.
Another marketing point.
yes, twitter was updated to https://twitter.com/XCplatform
I will devote some time tomorrow morning to the branding and marketing and catching up on everything that was put on the back burner during the last week...
Be sure to send me a pm
Take a rest you deserve it. May 26, 2014, 07:26:46 PM
With all respect for your work, the brand identy of this coin has not been given sufficient consideration.
Agree. But maybe they know it won't matter. Maybe they don't have long term plans. Hope I'm wrong though.
I think the XC is perfect sorry but so do a lot of people here. Also, I'm not part of the team just to make that clear.
I believe that judging from the future roadmap the dev has laid out, he has future long term plans.
Edit: ^ Well there you go
May 26, 2014, 07:26:13 PM
With all respect for your work, the brand identy of this coin has not been given sufficient consideration.
Agree. But maybe they know it won't matter. Maybe they don't have long term plans. Hope I'm wrong though.
I did give it a lot of consideration and yes there are LONG TERM plans...
May 26, 2014, 07:25:03 PM
The only problem with #XC on twitter is that you get a ton of cross country tweets.
Another marketing point.
yes, twitter was updated to https://twitter.com/XCplatform
I will devote some time tomorrow morning to the branding and marketing and catching up on everything that was put on the back burner during the last week...
Jump to: