Let's keep the discussion here focused on Counterparty. (PayCoin, in particular, seems to have no real connection to Counterparty or its functionality, and there already exist multiple clones of Counterparty on faster blockchains.)
Here, here. Keep up the great work!
Not recognizing true value of XCP is my favorite thing about crypto market psychology.
I agree. Until Counterparty is traded on a significant exchange the price is meaningless. I have a feeling that as soon as Kraken sort out their takeover of Mt.Gox and their push into the Japanese market they are the type of exchange who will support XCP and other CP asset trading. Before this happens a few things would help facilitate that:
1. Desktop/Server CP client (with GUI).
2. Enterprise security features: Multi-sig, Trezor Support etc. Think Armory for Counterparty.
3. At least a few high trading volume XCP assets (A version of Nubits [possibly one for every major Fiat curency] built on top of Counterparty would achieve this). Swarm really taking off could establish this too.
4. Establishment of the Counterparty Foundation (an official body that can be consulted for help).
5. Counterparty turning 1 year old (soon!).
6. Understanding that the Decentralized Exchange can be a powerful tool for a Centralized Exchange to interface with.
7. Understanding that the Smart Contracts can be a powerful tool for a Centralized Exchange to interface with.
Did I miss anything?
That's a good list!
(1) is in the works. re: (2), multisig is
almost ready, and Trezor should work today AFAIK. (4), too, is already done! The rest of the list is sort of out of the Foundation's hands.
Thanks for the response Adam. I knew about most of that progress, but that is just because I keep up to speed on developments. What is interesting is how people new to Counterparty will react in say, 6 months, when they stumble upon this project which has an incredibly powerful infrastructure and ecosystem. Even looking at it know there is a sense of "Crikey, they thought of everything!".
One thing I forgot to mention on that list can be captured by what I addressed to the Blockscan developer in his thread earlier today -
How well are you prepared for a huge amount of traffic directed towards Blockscan.com? I am aware of a number of projects (one in particular, once the free Asset Issuance rolls out) that will use online Counterparty Block Explorers (currently only Blockscan) heavily. Is there any way to pay for increased use of your API? Could you add more functionality to your API?
Are you familiar with services like
https://block.io/ and
https://chain.com/? Have you thought about positioning yourself to serve the corresponding Counterparty Market? Particularly focusing on "Enterprise" solutions? Perhaps you could be a go to service that the impending Counterparty Foundation recommends?
How many nodes are you connected to at any one time? I.e. are you well protected from a sybil attack?
Essentially, having one or more dedicated Counterparty/Bitcoin API companies may facilitate more innovation and applications even more quickly!
P.S: That is great to hear about the Trezor support. If it actually rolls out in Counterwallet shortly, then it could be the first wallet besides "myTrezor" -
https://mytrezor.com/ - to officially support it! Electrum and Armory have yet to roll out their respective official implementations. On that note, Counterwallet is an absolutely awesome web wallet. Is there any chance of marketing it more to regular Bitcoin users?