Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 202. (Read 1276789 times)

sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 254
Counterparty Developer
Code:
C:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd server

C:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 21, in
 
    from lib import config, api, util, exceptions, bitcoin, blocks, blockchain
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\api.py", line 17, in le>
    import flask
ImportError: No module named flask

C:\counterpartyd_build>

 Huh

how to install flask?

Best bet is to rerun the build system,  it will install flask as part of the setup (which is a newer dependency...)

Or you could manually install via pip.exe
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 104
Counterparty
Code:
C:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd server

C:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 21, in
 
    from lib import config, api, util, exceptions, bitcoin, blocks, blockchain
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\api.py", line 17, in le>
    import flask
ImportError: No module named flask

C:\counterpartyd_build>

 Huh

how to install flask?
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
Don't forget that no serious assets would go for alts for the same reason that people not like LTC.

Many bitcoiners don't even like to approve Counterparty only because we introduced a new currency, XCP.

But it's sure be a lot easier for people to swallow than having some new currencies running ontop of other new currencies.

Cloning coin, or making one from stratch is moot and not create value.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Why is there a need for faster transactions? Block chain size and security should outweigh speed in my opinion. XCP has an advantage being built on Bitcoin.

I don't know of any existing market in the history of the modern world where the average "tick time" is some random duration of approximately 10 minutes, or occasionally very much longer.

It has yet to be seen whether a functioning live market can develop under these conditions.

I'm all for Counterparty and decentralized markets in general, and agree with the current chain size and security advantages, but have my doubts about this.  I've also been playing with VIA/XCH for this reason, but it also suffers from this same speed issue, only to a lesser degree.

Much business is done "Net 30"
Modern banking takes days to months.
10ish minutes is not so cumbersome as the alternatives.

yea but stuff like monero and bitshares are way faster, even doge is pretty fast

10 minutes with the occasional 30  minute wait is just too much for instageneration

that said ethereum and maidsafe should be very fast a well

regarding security.  if doge has 10 blocks in the time btc has 1 block, which tx is more secure?

The main strength/differentiator of Counterparty is being able to use Bitcoin natively.  Someone can obtain Bitcoin, and then without having to use any kind of centralized exchange, start trading in Counterparty assets.  Of course, being on the Bitcoin blockchain is also a weakness, mostly for slowness reasons.  However, I believe that the strength outweighs the weakness.  There is a place for Counterparty-on-Bitcoin; it is a viable niche.  (That being said, of course I don't have all my eggs in the Counterparty basket...) 

If you want close-to-real-time trading, you will have to find something that is not on a Bitcoin-derived blockchain, because short block times equate to forking problems.  You need a from-scratch, purpose-written protocol such as NXT, Ethereum or BitShares in order to reliably achieve sub-minute trades.  Of course, all of these have their own issues; the largest being, they are all new/unproven compared to Bitcoin, and could have undiscovered flaws which result in them being hacked and people losing their money.  Also, many people have issues with the "fairness" (or lack thereof) of the token distribution.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
Why is there a need for faster transactions? Block chain size and security should outweigh speed in my opinion. XCP has an advantage being built on Bitcoin.

I don't know of any existing market in the history of the modern world where the average "tick time" is some random duration of approximately 10 minutes, or occasionally very much longer.

It has yet to be seen whether a functioning live market can develop under these conditions.

I'm all for Counterparty and decentralized markets in general, and agree with the current chain size and security advantages, but have my doubts about this.  I've also been playing with VIA/XCH for this reason, but it also suffers from this same speed issue, only to a lesser degree.

Much business is done "Net 30"
Modern banking takes days to months.
10ish minutes is not so cumbersome as the alternatives.

yea but stuff like monero and bitshares are way faster, even doge is pretty fast

10 minutes with the occasional 30  minute wait is just too much for instageneration

that said ethereum and maidsafe should be very fast a well

regarding security.  if doge has 10 blocks in the time btc has 1 block, which tx is more secure?
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
Why is there a need for faster transactions? Block chain size and security should outweigh speed in my opinion. XCP has an advantage being built on Bitcoin.

I don't know of any existing market in the history of the modern world where the average "tick time" is some random duration of approximately 10 minutes, or occasionally very much longer.

It has yet to be seen whether a functioning live market can develop under these conditions.

I'm all for Counterparty and decentralized markets in general, and agree with the current chain size and security advantages, but have my doubts about this.  I've also been playing with VIA/XCH for this reason, but it also suffers from this same speed issue, only to a lesser degree.

Much business is done "Net 30"
Modern banking takes days to months.
10ish minutes is not so cumbersome as the alternatives.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 260
...it also suffers from this same speed issue, only to a lesser degree.

What would be acceptable in terms of speed? Decentralized systems can't be as fast as centralized and cannot deliver data in under 1 second. So what would be a good balance between comfortable use and still keeping things decentralized (=protected from tampering with)?
sr. member
Activity: 408
Merit: 261
Why is there a need for faster transactions? Block chain size and security should outweigh speed in my opinion. XCP has an advantage being built on Bitcoin.

I don't know of any existing market in the history of the modern world where the average "tick time" is some random duration of approximately 10 minutes, or occasionally very much longer.

It has yet to be seen whether a functioning live market can develop under these conditions.

I'm all for Counterparty and decentralized markets in general, and agree with the current chain size and security advantages, but have my doubts about this.  I've also been playing with VIA/XCH for this reason, but it also suffers from this same speed issue, only to a lesser degree.
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 104
Counterparty
Code:
C:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd server

C:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 21, in
 
    from lib import config, api, util, exceptions, bitcoin, blocks, blockchain
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\api.py", line 17, in le>
    import flask
ImportError: No module named flask

C:\counterpartyd_build>

 Huh
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
A nice bump in price. Its still way undervalued compared to its potential.

I would have liked to see XCP move platform or go on an independent chain like DPOS, but the developers doesn't seem to be interested in this.

Luke-jr and maybe some other bitcoin devs is like little kids who don't want play together with neighbor house kids in their sandbox, but there is coming day when they grow up and ask XCP and MSC join to play same game   Cheesy Thats why there no need other chains.  But that is just normal because neighbors kids have bigger trucks and better toys and they have only sandbox.

I think there is need as Bitcoin is too slow. In addition it is dependent and centralized by the cartel. Moving to a DPOS or TF chain will mean fast transactions.
hero member
Activity: 689
Merit: 507
Swarm and Foldingcoin entered Coinmarketcap.com (Assets Tab)

And 80% of the people watching coinmarketcap won't even notice them since they show the currencies page by default.

+1

It is a good thing that Assets and Coins are differenciated. There could be more Assets than coins in the future.

And Counterparty is on both pages anyway.

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1017
Swarm and Foldingcoin entered Coinmarketcap.com (Assets Tab)

And 80% of the people watching coinmarketcap won't even notice them since they show the currencies page by default.
hero member
Activity: 689
Merit: 507
Swarm and Foldingcoin entered Coinmarketcap.com (Assets Tab)
hero member
Activity: 647
Merit: 510
Counterpartying
hero member
Activity: 689
Merit: 507
Luke-jr and maybe some other bitcoin devs is like little kids who don't want play together with neighbor house kids in their sandbox, but there is coming day when they grow up and ask XCP and MSC join to play same game   Cheesy Thats why there no need other chains.  But that is just normal because neighbors kids have bigger trucks and other toys and they have only sandbox.

That's why he has "Jr." in his name Smiley

Luke filters out XCP,  MSC, etc. transactions and I don't think he's gonna change his mind soon. The only thing is that Eligius pool share is shrinking (from more than 10% to 5% in 12 months) and his opinion & influence will soon be insignificant

Well, at least there's this....

Announcement

As always, Eligius plans to support full miner customisation of their own policies via GBT as soon as it's finished.
However, since that is still a bit off, we've decided to hold a public discussion to determine the more near-future Eligius transaction mining policies.
Topics may include things such as spam filtering, transaction fees, prioritisation, or anything else that affects what transactions we put in our blocks.

The discussion has been tentatively scheduled for October 4th at 4 PM UTC in hopes that this is convenient for the greatest possible number of miners.
This is 9 AM for west coast USA, noon for east coast USA, and 8 PM for Moscow.
It is also Lamboary  at 9.99T by the Tonal calendar and clock.

Since the meeting may have high turn-out, it is advised to use a dedicated IRC client or the freenode webchat client rather than the webpage's Chat applet.


At the risk of sounding self-aggrandizing, this might be due to a long conversation between myself and Luke-Jr in the Eligius thread a week or two ago, on the topic of (mostly) Counterparty, in which I mentioned that not mining Counterparty txs was leaving money on the table.  I recommend that you read it, Luke-Jr is really not as closed-minded as he may have appeared back in March/April (?).  And this IRC meeting of Eligius miners is proof of it.

Thanks ! Even if it may be not correlated, you took time to explain and discuss with Eligius pool.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Luke-jr and maybe some other bitcoin devs is like little kids who don't want play together with neighbor house kids in their sandbox, but there is coming day when they grow up and ask XCP and MSC join to play same game   Cheesy Thats why there no need other chains.  But that is just normal because neighbors kids have bigger trucks and other toys and they have only sandbox.

That's why he has "Jr." in his name Smiley

Luke filters out XCP,  MSC, etc. transactions and I don't think he's gonna change his mind soon. The only thing is that Eligius pool share is shrinking (from more than 10% to 5% in 12 months) and his opinion & influence will soon be insignificant

Well, at least there's this....

Announcement

As always, Eligius plans to support full miner customisation of their own policies via GBT as soon as it's finished.
However, since that is still a bit off, we've decided to hold a public discussion to determine the more near-future Eligius transaction mining policies.
Topics may include things such as spam filtering, transaction fees, prioritisation, or anything else that affects what transactions we put in our blocks.

The discussion has been tentatively scheduled for October 4th at 4 PM UTC in hopes that this is convenient for the greatest possible number of miners.
This is 9 AM for west coast USA, noon for east coast USA, and 8 PM for Moscow.
It is also Lamboary  at 9.99T by the Tonal calendar and clock.

Since the meeting may have high turn-out, it is advised to use a dedicated IRC client or the freenode webchat client rather than the webpage's Chat applet.


At the risk of sounding self-aggrandizing, this might be due to a long conversation between myself and Luke-Jr in the Eligius thread a week or two ago, on the topic of (mostly) Counterparty, in which I mentioned that not mining Counterparty txs was leaving money on the table.  I recommend that you read it, Luke-Jr is really not as closed-minded as he may have appeared back in March/April (?).  And this IRC meeting of Eligius miners is proof of it.
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 14

Hello XCP community,

Starting today, it is now possible to post bets on any subject that interests you in an easy and secure manner through a decentralized pot. Adoption of the Counterparty technology has never been simpler and its advantages more obvious to the general crypto community.

We are pleased to announce that we have integrated into our website the option of becoming an oracle – Posting and settling bets on top of the XCP network. Through this option you can offer users to make bets on anything that interests you.
      
This is a unique opportunity for the Counterparty community to market XCP and to demonstrate its advantages through an advanced betting application using superior technology.

The main categories featured are: "Sports", "Currencies", "Culture", "Politics", "Global Events" and anything else that comes to mind may be posted in the "Others" category.
            
You can access the users' panel through the following link:
http://xbet.io/categories/oracles

You can become an oracle and start posting your own lines through the following link:
http://xbet.io/oracles/join
            
The System is compatible with Blockchain.info and Bitcoin-qt. It is recommended to use any of these wallets to hold your oracle address.

We would also like to inform you that we are in the process of integrating a reputation system that would help users decide which oracle they trust most. Now is an excellent time for community members to post their bets, acquire reputation and gather followers.

In addition to integrating oracle bets on XBet.IO, we have also made it simpler for new and experienced users to get to know XBet.IO and the new features that are constantly being added to it. Simply click on "How to Bet?" on the main menu.


newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Giving the fact that Overstock has publicly claimed it want to issue stock on bitcoin and counterparty, why would bitcoiners still debate whether finance on bitcoin is useful ? A Nasdaq Company, which played a great role in bitcoin success, is saying it is the future of finance of bitcoin and someone stands against that ?
It is becoming all emotionnal or egoist if so.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Luke-jr and maybe some other bitcoin devs is like little kids who don't want play together with neighbor house kids in their sandbox, but there is coming day when they grow up and ask XCP and MSC join to play same game   Cheesy Thats why there no need other chains.  But that is just normal because neighbors kids have bigger trucks and other toys and they have only sandbox.

That's why he has "Jr." in his name Smiley

Luke filters out XCP,  MSC, etc. transactions and I don't think he's gonna change his mind soon. The only thing is that Eligius pool share is shrinking (from more than 10% to 5% in 12 months) and his opinion & influence will soon be insignificant
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 260
Luke-jr and maybe some other bitcoin devs is like little kids who don't want play together with neighbor house kids in their sandbox, but there is coming day when they grow up and ask XCP and MSC join to play same game   Cheesy Thats why there no need other chains.  But that is just normal because neighbors kids have bigger trucks and other toys and they have only sandbox.

That's why he has "Jr." in his name Smiley
Jump to: