[ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 299.

dzarmush

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1001

Quote from: halfcab123 on April 19, 2014, 07:24:43 AM

Quote from: dzarmush on April 19, 2014, 07:00:58 AM

Hey guys, sorry for stupid question. If you have a wiki or something like this just please give me a link and I'll find an answer.

I have one address for btc/xcp because xcp is built on top of btc blockchain, right? But how does it know did I send btc or xcp? I sent both currencies on the same address but somehow they entered on right accounts: xcp to xcp, btc to btc.

The BTC is recognized by bitcoind, bitcoinqt, etc., (Bitcoin clients)
XCP is recognized by counterpartyd, counterpartywalletd, etc., (If the bitcoin blockchain has the txindex=1)

XCP data is metadata associated with very tiny bitcoin transactions, which are used to sustain the meta network.

I don't understand your question, "but somehow they entered on right accounts...?" Please elaborate

I send xcp or btc from Bter on the same address and money somehow appears on xcp and btc accounts although there's only 1 address for both currencies.

porqupine

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 101

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 12:57:53 PM

Quote from: porqupine on April 19, 2014, 12:14:45 PM

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 12:06:29 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 11:49:14 AM

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 11:38:09 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

no it's utterly pointless when there are many other alternatives out there that don't cost 2 g's.

sometimes i feel like very few people on this forum have any common sense.

You can't build a world-class financial framework and expect its participants to give away their assets. But they might.... If we want ROCKMINER here, we should procure a guarantee from that company and then chip in to buy the asset name.

not smart.

give incentive to bad behavior because the protocol was designed poorly.

There is no incentive for bad behavior - the asset names issue has been thoroughly discussed.

Bad Design imho is a Dex which does not support BTC <-> Asset transactions (i.e. one needs to purchase MSC to buy Safecoin) and manual order matching on BTC transactions.

Also Balance initiation with a fund-raiser by which J.R. Willet got 30% of MSC for sending Bitcoin to himself.

And transaction fees debited into a private address.

Enough said.

you're right, no incentive at all

that guy must be really confused

Wink

He is. All of this has been discussed. I just posted a TLDR for this on the forums.

https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,279.0.html

prophetx

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1010

he who has the gold makes the rules

Quote from: porqupine on April 19, 2014, 12:14:45 PM

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 12:06:29 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 11:49:14 AM

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 11:38:09 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

no it's utterly pointless when there are many other alternatives out there that don't cost 2 g's.

sometimes i feel like very few people on this forum have any common sense.

You can't build a world-class financial framework and expect its participants to give away their assets. But they might.... If we want ROCKMINER here, we should procure a guarantee from that company and then chip in to buy the asset name.

not smart.

give incentive to bad behavior because the protocol was designed poorly.

There is no incentive for bad behavior - the asset names issue has been thoroughly discussed.

Bad Design imho is a Dex which does not support BTC <-> Asset transactions (i.e. one needs to purchase MSC to buy Safecoin) and manual order matching on BTC transactions.

Also Balance initiation with a fund-raiser by which J.R. Willet got 30% of MSC for sending Bitcoin to himself.

And transaction fees debited into a private address.

Enough said.

you're right, no incentive at all

that guy must be really confused

Wink

bitcoinrocks

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 12:06:29 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 11:49:14 AM

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 11:38:09 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

no it's utterly pointless when there are many other alternatives out there that don't cost 2 g's.

sometimes i feel like very few people on this forum have any common sense.

You can't build a world-class financial framework and expect its participants to give away their assets. But they might.... If we want ROCKMINER here, we should procure a guarantee from that company and then chip in to buy the asset name.

not smart.

give incentive to bad behavior because the protocol was designed poorly.

The free market was not designed poorly.

freedomfighter

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 11:49:14 AM

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 11:38:09 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

no it's utterly pointless when there are many other alternatives out there that don't cost 2 g's.

sometimes i feel like very few people on this forum have any common sense.

You can't build a world-class financial framework and expect its participants to give away their assets. But they might.... If we want ROCKMINER here, we should procure a guarantee from that company and then chip in to buy the asset name.

This is a direct result of having the asset at 0.5xcp which is and was a mistake. it needs to be 5 or 10 so no (real) parasites can buy 100 assets to blackmail later

porqupine

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 101

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 12:06:29 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 11:49:14 AM

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 11:38:09 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

no it's utterly pointless when there are many other alternatives out there that don't cost 2 g's.

sometimes i feel like very few people on this forum have any common sense.

You can't build a world-class financial framework and expect its participants to give away their assets. But they might.... If we want ROCKMINER here, we should procure a guarantee from that company and then chip in to buy the asset name.

not smart.

give incentive to bad behavior because the protocol was designed poorly.

There is no incentive for bad behavior - the asset names issue has been thoroughly discussed.

Bad Design imho is a Dex which does not support BTC <-> Asset transactions (i.e. one needs to purchase MSC to buy Safecoin) and manual order matching on BTC transactions.

Also Balance initiation with a fund-raiser by which J.R. Willet got 30% of MSC for sending Bitcoin to himself.

And transaction fees debited into a private address.

Enough said.

prophetx

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1010

he who has the gold makes the rules

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 11:49:14 AM

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 11:38:09 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

no it's utterly pointless when there are many other alternatives out there that don't cost 2 g's.

sometimes i feel like very few people on this forum have any common sense.

You can't build a world-class financial framework and expect its participants to give away their assets. But they might.... If we want ROCKMINER here, we should procure a guarantee from that company and then chip in to buy the asset name.

not smart.

give incentive to bad behavior because the protocol was designed poorly.

bitcoinrocks

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Quote from: prophetx on April 19, 2014, 11:38:09 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

no it's utterly pointless when there are many other alternatives out there that don't cost 2 g's.

sometimes i feel like very few people on this forum have any common sense.

You can't build a world-class financial framework and expect its participants to give away their assets. But they might.... If we want ROCKMINER here, we should procure a guarantee from that company and then chip in to buy the asset name.

prophetx

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1010

he who has the gold makes the rules

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

no it's utterly pointless when there are many other alternatives out there that don't cost 2 g's.

sometimes i feel like very few people on this forum have any common sense.

prophetx

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1010

he who has the gold makes the rules

Quote from: coingifts on April 19, 2014, 10:45:59 AM

Quote from: qtgwith on April 19, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

Quote from: frozen123 on April 19, 2014, 10:17:26 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:10:29 AM

Quote from: halfcab123 on April 19, 2014, 10:05:48 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC

I don't think anyone else is bidding. If they do they're hoping to sell for more and that seems like a silly strategy given that the ROCKMINER company hasn't even decided to participate in Counterparty.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can use another name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

So sad news to coingifts, haha. The value of ROCKMINER asset name is 0 now?

Hahaha, are you so happy?

Use another name is not a good idea. You know

or he can come use mastercoin or colored coins

good job squatter, remember kharmas a bitch lol

frozen123

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: frozen123 on April 19, 2014, 08:48:19 AM

seems like people enjoying register so many good assets name."A total of 859 valid #Counterparty assets issued"

is there any plan for those assets to be verified or any solutions in the future?

This problem with assets name rush registration make people who truly have those assets have to pay to those greedy registers.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can use another name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

But i dont think that is the best solution for him or anyone who will have the same problem in the future.

I think we should focus about future ,not this case,because this could happen to others.And coingifts just represent himself.

gitinahang

jr. member

Activity: 43

Merit: 30

Quote from: coingifts on April 19, 2014, 10:45:59 AM

Quote from: qtgwith on April 19, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

Quote from: frozen123 on April 19, 2014, 10:17:26 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:10:29 AM

Quote from: halfcab123 on April 19, 2014, 10:05:48 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC

I don't think anyone else is bidding. If they do they're hoping to sell for more and that seems like a silly strategy given that the ROCKMINER company hasn't even decided to participate in Counterparty.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can use another name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

So sad news to coingifts, haha. The value of ROCKMINER asset name is 0 now?

Hahaha, are you so happy?

Use another name is not a good idea. You know

Typical short sighted chinese scammer. How stupid will you feel when you get nothing for your name squatting. In the future when counterparty
is already a successful platform will squatters make some money because "Google" will NEED to be on here. But at this point it is very critical
for rockminer issue on cp with their name. They dont need us we need them this early in the game. We need companies to start issuing or we're dead. Aren't you an xcp investor coingifts? Are you that dumb not to see if you give away rockminer it could be a big boost for cp? If you continue
this auction you will receive nothing. Rockminer will pass or use another name as they should. Crypto community already has a bad opinion blaming
China for this 2014 downswing. You are contributing to everybody's stereotype of "another chinese scammer idiot".

bitcoinrocks

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Quote from: nakaone on April 19, 2014, 10:43:11 AM

in my opion a great possibility to get order into the asset exchange:

https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,220.0.html

My first reaction here is that it adds complexity to Counterparty which it doesn't need. We should focus on simplicity as much as possible. IMHO, the simplest, most natural solution is best in situations like this, and that solution is the free market.

coingifts

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 100

Quote from: qtgwith on April 19, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

Quote from: frozen123 on April 19, 2014, 10:17:26 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:10:29 AM

Quote from: halfcab123 on April 19, 2014, 10:05:48 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC

I don't think anyone else is bidding. If they do they're hoping to sell for more and that seems like a silly strategy given that the ROCKMINER company hasn't even decided to participate in Counterparty.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can use another name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

So sad news to coingifts, haha. The value of ROCKMINER asset name is 0 now?

Hahaha, are you so happy?

Use another name is not a good idea. You know

nakaone

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

in my opion a great possibility to get order into the asset exchange:

https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,220.0.html

qtgwith

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Quote from: frozen123 on April 19, 2014, 10:17:26 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:10:29 AM

Quote from: halfcab123 on April 19, 2014, 10:05:48 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC

I don't think anyone else is bidding. If they do they're hoping to sell for more and that seems like a silly strategy given that the ROCKMINER company hasn't even decided to participate in Counterparty.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can use another name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

So sad news to coingifts, haha. The value of ROCKMINER asset name is 0 now?

frozen123

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:10:29 AM

Quote from: halfcab123 on April 19, 2014, 10:05:48 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC

I don't think anyone else is bidding. If they do they're hoping to sell for more and that seems like a silly strategy given that the ROCKMINER company hasn't even decided to participate in Counterparty.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can use another name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

bitcoinrocks

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Quote from: halfcab123 on April 19, 2014, 10:05:48 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC

I don't think anyone else is bidding. If they do they're hoping to sell for more and that seems like a silly strategy given that the ROCKMINER company hasn't even decided to participate in Counterparty.

halfcab123

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on April 19, 2014, 10:05:07 AM

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC

bitcoinrocks

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset. That seems reasonable to me. Let's keep it professional.

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 299. (Read 1276817 times)