Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 300. (Read 1276912 times)

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset.  That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC

I don't think anyone else is bidding.  If they do they're hoping to sell for more and that seems like a silly strategy given that the ROCKMINER company hasn't even decided to participate in Counterparty.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset.  That seems reasonable to me.

Buy it now Bid: 10BTC
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
So coingifts wants 3.5BTC for the ROCKMINER asset.  That seems reasonable to me.  Let's keep it professional.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Quote
seems like  people enjoying register so many good assets name."A total of 859 valid #Counterparty assets issued"

is there any plan for those assets to be verified or any solutions in the future?

This problem with  assets name rush registration make people who truly have those assets  have to pay to those greedy registers.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can  use anther name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

But i dont think that is the best solution for him or anyone who will have the same problem in the future.

We must have seen this coming.  We can't expect users to not do this out of the goodness of their hearts.

coingifts, what would you sell your ROCKMINER asset for?

Hi Bitcoinrock,  you can check it here   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573504.new#new

Asset name: ROCKMINER
End: Auction ends on 04/26/2014 PM 11:59:59 , BTT Time.
Min Bid: 3.5BTC
Min Increment: 0.1BTC
Buy it now Bid: 10BTC
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
Quote
seems like  people enjoying register so many good assets name."A total of 859 valid #Counterparty assets issued"

is there any plan for those assets to be verified or any solutions in the future?

This problem with  assets name rush registration make people who truly have those assets  have to pay to those greedy registers.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can  use anther name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

But i dont think that is the best solution for him or anyone who will have the same problem in the future.

We must have seen this coming.  We can't expect users to not do this out of the goodness of their hearts.

coingifts, what would you sell your ROCKMINER asset for?
full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Quote
Rockminer was considering IPO via CounterParty, it will be ideal for both.

However a user sniped the name, and now the issuer thinks shareholders would be confused having multiple, but similar sounding asset names, and so perhaps might not go ahead, I sent PM to the user, because if he has interests of counterparty at heart he would transfer the asset, however he is too short sighted and greedy and instead wants to sell. He potentially dealt a big blow to counterparty with that move.

I'm OK with free market stuff.  The user should set his price and maybe Rockminer will buy it or the community might pitch it to buy it if they trust Rockminer will really launch.

i am ROCKMINER name owner.   i I agree with your idea.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
seems like  people enjoying register so many good assets name."A total of 859 valid #Counterparty assets issued"

is there any plan for those assets to be verified or any solutions in the future?

This problem with  assets name rush registration make people who truly have those assets  have to pay to those greedy registers.

About ROCKMINER ,the CEO of the ROCKMINER said he can  use another name on Counterparty if he wants issue his stock on Counterparty.

But i dont think that is the best solution for him or anyone who will have the same problem in the future.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
Quote
Rockminer was considering IPO via CounterParty, it will be ideal for both.

However a user sniped the name, and now the issuer thinks shareholders would be confused having multiple, but similar sounding asset names, and so perhaps might not go ahead, I sent PM to the user, because if he has interests of counterparty at heart he would transfer the asset, however he is too short sighted and greedy and instead wants to sell. He potentially dealt a big blow to counterparty with that move.

I'm OK with free market stuff.  The user should set his price and maybe Rockminer will buy it or the community might pitch it to buy it if they trust Rockminer will really launch.
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 101
There is no reason for the Asset Names to affect issuance - the real asset should just contain a link with a PGP signature.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
Safecoin(Maidsafe): Buyers guide"4.Backers will receive 17,000 MaidSafeCoins per bitcoin
sent to the SAFE Network Bitcoin exodus address or 3400 MaidSafeCoins per mastercoin sent to the SAFE Network Mastercoin exodus address
."  

That means the Maidsafe official team setting up the mastercoin price to 0.2btc.    

In my opnion,i dont agree with that idea and i dont know why they did that.  


Maidsafe link: http://www.safecoin.io/
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 504
there is one asset "Maidsafe" will open IPO based on mastercoin,
so for xcp ,we should also consider the assets issuance or IPO on xcp. Grin

Exactly.

 Rockminer was considering IPO via CounterParty, it will be ideal for both.

However a user sniped the asset name ROCKMINER, and now the issuer thinks shareholders would be confused having multiple, but similar sounding asset names, and so perhaps might not go ahead, I sent PM to the user, because if he has interests of counterparty at heart he would transfer the asset, however he is too short sighted and greedy and instead wants to sell. He potentially dealt a big blow to counterparty with that move, because of course nobody will pay for the asset name, it's like negotiating with a scammer

Hi,

Can you transfer ownership of ROCKMINER asset to Rockxie please?
He is concerned that somebody has taken the business name
If ROCKMINER is listed on XCP, the future will be much brighter.
This will be first big company to take advantage of counterparty.

Thanks



Hi Anotheranonlol,

How you know I registered asset name rockminer?
Yes I have ROCKMINER name. I think bid on batt is fair.

I open a thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573504.new#new

You can check it.


Another asset looking for a home is Activemining https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6284868

There is a need for competent 'blue-chip' companies to issue assets via this protocol, to see gradual up-tick in adoption. This will come over time.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Safecoin IPO on MSC makes MSC price to moon.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
Speak of the devil, mastercoin volume went to over a quarter million dollars in the past 24 hours... 24 hour gain of 85%, its at 0.14~ odd BTC / MSC right now...
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
Hey guys, sorry for stupid question. If you have a wiki or something like this just please give me a link and I'll find an answer.

I have one address for btc/xcp because xcp is built on top of btc blockchain, right? But how does it know did I send btc or xcp? I sent both currencies on the same address but somehow they entered on right accounts: xcp to xcp, btc to btc.

The BTC is recognized by bitcoind, bitcoinqt, etc., (Bitcoin clients)
XCP is recognized by counterpartyd, counterpartywalletd, etc., (If the bitcoin blockchain has the txindex=1)

XCP data is metadata associated with very tiny bitcoin transactions, which are used to sustain the meta network.

I don't understand your question, "but somehow they entered on right accounts...?" Please elaborate
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
Just released v6.15, which fixes a small, but protocol-level bug. Everyone has to upgrade again.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
Have you all read this article?  http://www.minyanville.com/business-news/editors-pick/articles/The-People-Who-Burn-Bitcoins-bitcoin/4/16/2014/id/54627?refresh=1

Probably the most definitive publicity I've seen. It's filled to the brim with positivity.
i collected every news/articles information i found ,here is the link:   https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,264.0.html
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001
Hey guys, sorry for stupid question. If you have a wiki or something like this just please give me a link and I'll find an answer.

I have one address for btc/xcp because xcp is built on top of btc blockchain, right? But how does it know did I send btc or xcp? I sent both currencies on the same address but somehow they entered on right accounts: xcp to xcp, btc to btc.
legendary
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1000
The Experience Layer of the Decentralized Internet
there is one asset "Maidsafe" will open IPO based on mastercoin,
so for xcp ,we should also consider the assets issuance or IPO on xcp. Grin
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
I'm just waiting for that one rich investor who "gets it" to sweep the sell order book on all exchanged including the DEX,  and our heads are going to spin....  it's only a matter of time.
Jump to: