Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 398. (Read 1276826 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
Great news! XCP will be added to Chinese currency (CNY) market @btercom on Mar. 17

https://twitter.com/btercom/status/444730204875808768


Nice, maybe this increase trade volume in centralized exchanges and then soon also we get web wallet and easy dex.
I write them question about cny market for xcp 4 day ago and get this answer
Bter Support (bter)

Mar 11 09:16

Dear Sir,
Your suggestion will be highly valued

Very very cool.
full member
Activity: 219
Merit: 102
Great news! XCP will be added to Chinese currency (CNY) market @btercom on Mar. 17

https://twitter.com/btercom/status/444730204875808768


Nice, maybe this increase trade volume in centralized exchanges and then soon also we get web wallet and easy dex.
I write them question about cny market for xcp 4 day ago and get this answer
Bter Support (bter)

Mar 11 09:16

Dear Sir,
Your suggestion will be highly valued
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
Mastercoin Dex is now live!

Is it possible to trade anything else but MSC on the Mastercoin DEX?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
Trying to get Counterpary running on Desktop Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (64-bit) but seem unable to do so. Building updating, bitcoin reindexing all went fine, tutorials are all quite clear. I am now running counterparty v6.6 and bitcoind v0.8.6.0-g03a7d67-beta

But I get an error message when I try to run the counterparty server:
# counterpartyd server
Status: RESTART
Unhandled exception in thread started by
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
Aborted (core dumped)

I have installed the IA32-libs and there are 2 editions for libgcc_s.so.1:
$ find /lib -name 'libgcc*'
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1

But I still keep getting this error.
Any tips?

No one to offer any hints on how to solve this?

I have the hunch that the box has a non-standard version of Python on it. If you are on Ubuntu 64-bit, you shouldn't need ia32-libs I believe for anything with Counterparty... actually, from googling that error, it appears that you're probably trying to run counterparty with the 32-bit Python or something similar.... the virtualenv install script probably found a 32-bit Python and used that instead of the 64-bit version, I'm guessing.

To confirm, you could try commands like:
Code:
which python3
ldd `which python3`
python3 -c "import platform;print(platform.architecture())"

The last line should return "('64bit', 'ELF')". (Or, just start up the Python interpreter and see if it mentions 32-bit or 64-bit)... and actually I'd perform the same checks on the python binary over at counterpartyd_build/env/bin/python3 on your box (where ever you installed counterpartyd_build).

The options would be to either remove all that 32-bit compatibility stuff, or work on a fresh Ubuntu install (13.10 x64 is optimal here).



Thanks for the input!
$ ldd `which python3`
   linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff0e5e6000)
   libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f7b972df000)
   libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f7b970db000)
   libutil.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f7b96ed7000)
   libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007f7b96c79000)
   libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0x00007f7b9689e000)
   libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007f7b96686000)
   libexpat.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1 (0x00007f7b9645c000)
   libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f7b96160000)
   libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f7b95d9f000)
   /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f7b97522000)
$ python3 -c "import platform;print(platform.architecture())"
('64bit', 'ELF')

So, yes, I am using 64-bit all the way. I did not mention that I installed the IA32-libs as a last resort and *after* building counterparty. This morning I deleted my ~/counterpartyd_build and ~/.config/counterpartyd folders, and started from scratch. And behold: it works now  Huh
Do not really understand why because the only thing that has changed is that the IA32-libs where present *before* running the setup. The whole chain is 64-bits, i checked...

Now I am waiting for counterparty server to catch up with the last BTC block. Seeing the rate in which it catches up this might be a couple of days even! Any idea on how long that will take?

(And again: Thanks for all the help I got!)

On my quad core i5 it took about 12 hours to sync from block 278k so considering were somewhere around 290k now it could take 24hrs especially if you have a slower connection or less horsepower
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Trying to get Counterpary running on Desktop Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (64-bit) but seem unable to do so. Building updating, bitcoin reindexing all went fine, tutorials are all quite clear. I am now running counterparty v6.6 and bitcoind v0.8.6.0-g03a7d67-beta

But I get an error message when I try to run the counterparty server:
# counterpartyd server
Status: RESTART
Unhandled exception in thread started by
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
Aborted (core dumped)

I have installed the IA32-libs and there are 2 editions for libgcc_s.so.1:
$ find /lib -name 'libgcc*'
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1

But I still keep getting this error.
Any tips?

No one to offer any hints on how to solve this?

I have the hunch that the box has a non-standard version of Python on it. If you are on Ubuntu 64-bit, you shouldn't need ia32-libs I believe for anything with Counterparty... actually, from googling that error, it appears that you're probably trying to run counterparty with the 32-bit Python or something similar.... the virtualenv install script probably found a 32-bit Python and used that instead of the 64-bit version, I'm guessing.

To confirm, you could try commands like:
Code:
which python3
ldd `which python3`
python3 -c "import platform;print(platform.architecture())"

The last line should return "('64bit', 'ELF')". (Or, just start up the Python interpreter and see if it mentions 32-bit or 64-bit)... and actually I'd perform the same checks on the python binary over at counterpartyd_build/env/bin/python3 on your box (where ever you installed counterpartyd_build).

The options would be to either remove all that 32-bit compatibility stuff, or work on a fresh Ubuntu install (13.10 x64 is optimal here).



Thanks for the input!
$ ldd `which python3`
   linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff0e5e6000)
   libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f7b972df000)
   libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f7b970db000)
   libutil.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f7b96ed7000)
   libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0x00007f7b96c79000)
   libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0x00007f7b9689e000)
   libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007f7b96686000)
   libexpat.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1 (0x00007f7b9645c000)
   libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f7b96160000)
   libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f7b95d9f000)
   /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f7b97522000)
$ python3 -c "import platform;print(platform.architecture())"
('64bit', 'ELF')

So, yes, I am using 64-bit all the way. I did not mention that I installed the IA32-libs as a last resort and *after* building counterparty. This morning I deleted my ~/counterpartyd_build and ~/.config/counterpartyd folders, and started from scratch. And behold: it works now  Huh
Do not really understand why because the only thing that has changed is that the IA32-libs where present *before* running the setup. The whole chain is 64-bits, i checked...

Now I am waiting for counterparty server to catch up with the last BTC block. Seeing the rate in which it catches up this might be a couple of days even! Any idea on how long that will take?

(And again: Thanks for all the help I got!)
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
Great news! XCP will be added to Chinese currency (CNY) market @btercom on Mar. 17

https://twitter.com/btercom/status/444730204875808768
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
someone will tell me his value

Please give us a clue what it is you speak of?

Do you have anything else you'd like to say?
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 502
someone will tell me his value

Please give us a clue what it is you speak of?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
someone will tell me his value
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 502
Mastercoin Dex is now live!
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
With a wallet like XNOVA is ready to push out to the tribe, can you even BELIEVE these CHEAP xcps ? LOL


Hi halfcab, XCPs are so cheap coz of no trading interest. If you really see the trading happening in both poloniex/bter, someone is trying to mix his XCPs(not sure why). I believe this guy is responsible for 90% of the trade in both the exchanges for last 3 weeks or so.(PM me if you are interested to know the address)

PP and XNOVA are doing a great job, no doubt in that. But the key is to generate more interest in XCP. The value of XCPs should be atleast that of MSC if not more.


Do you mean the market caps should be equal or counterparty greater? Master has 5x less coins total, so if the caps were equal xcp would be (msc/5) per coin. I was hoping we would see  at least half of MSC coin price for xcp, which would require the cap of counterparty to be 2.5x msc cap.

I'm going to get together with my filmer this weekend and make a decent commercial for counterparty.

How did you and your filmer get on with making the hard-hitting documentary you mentioned a couple of weeks back? can't wait to see the commercial good work halfcab!

I'm guessing you work in the television industry, have you got anything on youtube already you've done?

You can find one example here :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PSNL1qE6VY
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 502
With a wallet like XNOVA is ready to push out to the tribe, can you even BELIEVE these CHEAP xcps ? LOL


Hi halfcab, XCPs are so cheap coz of no trading interest. If you really see the trading happening in both poloniex/bter, someone is trying to mix his XCPs(not sure why). I believe this guy is responsible for 90% of the trade in both the exchanges for last 3 weeks or so.(PM me if you are interested to know the address)

PP and XNOVA are doing a great job, no doubt in that. But the key is to generate more interest in XCP. The value of XCPs should be atleast that of MSC if not more.


Do you mean the market caps should be equal or counterparty greater? Master has 5x less coins total, so if the caps were equal xcp would be (msc/5) per coin. I was hoping we would see  at least half of MSC coin price for xcp, which would require the cap of counterparty to be 2.5x msc cap.

I'm going to get together with my filmer this weekend and make a decent commercial for counterparty.

How did you and your filmer get on with making the hard-hitting documentary you mentioned a couple of weeks back? can't wait to see the commercial good work halfcab!

I'm guessing you work in the television industry, have you got anything on youtube already you've done?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
Once xcp hits 0.05 I'm going to go to kinkos and get a poster made with some of the buy orders like art and put it on my wall to remember what it was like before I was rich.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
With a wallet like XNOVA is ready to push out to the tribe, can you even BELIEVE these CHEAP xcps ? LOL


Hi halfcab, XCPs are so cheap coz of no trading interest. If you really see the trading happening in both poloniex/bter, someone is trying to mix his XCPs(not sure why). I believe this guy is responsible for 90% of the trade in both the exchanges for last 3 weeks or so.(PM me if you are interested to know the address)

PP and XNOVA are doing a great job, no doubt in that. But the key is to generate more interest in XCP. The value of XCPs should be atleast that of MSC if not more.


Do you mean the market caps should be equal or counterparty greater? Master has 5x less coins total, so if the caps were equal xcp would be (msc/5) per coin. I was hoping we would see  at least half of MSC coin price for xcp, which would require the cap of counterparty to be 2.5x msc cap.

I'm going to get together with my filmer this weekend and make a decent commercial for counterparty.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
With a wallet like XNOVA is ready to push out to the tribe, can you even BELIEVE these CHEAP xcps ? LOL

Hi halfcab, XCPs are so cheap coz of no trading interest. If you really see the trading happening in both poloniex/bter, someone is trying to mix his XCPs(not sure why). I believe this guy is responsible for 90% of the trade in both the exchanges for last 3 weeks or so.(PM me if you are interested to know the address)

PP and XNOVA are doing a great job, no doubt in that. But the key is to generate more interest in XCP. The value of XCPs should be atleast that of MSC if not more.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
With a wallet like XNOVA is ready to push out to the tribe, can you even BELIEVE these CHEAP xcps ? LOL
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
BitcoinTangibleTrust
Will you be selling Silver on your site as well. The reason I ask is because the spot price of one ounce gold coins is > 1400$.  
Beta testers/Early adopters of the service are not going to be spending large amounts. You need to get a few users on board for a smaller amount(possibly using smaller coins or sliver), then have them provide reviews and build trust in the community. Once trust is established larger orders will start to come in.  


A great question. We did not think about moving to Silver until you recommended it with your explanation above.

We are going to explore offering Silver as a low-risk entry for individuals to start. We like your approach and agree that with Gold's price heading past $1,400, the turmoil in Ukraine will add to folks seeking refuge in gold. Higher gold prices will make it harder for individuals to test our platform cheaply and with less risk.

I will return next week Monday with confirmation that we have Proof of Custody available in Silver that we can take Silver orders as a way for the community to explore in a low-cost low risk manner. Once we have Proof of Custody confirmed, we will create a process to take small silver orders for the community to test.



Really great idea, best of luck with it
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
Digitizing Valuable Hard Assets with Crypto
BitcoinTangibleTrust
Will you be selling Silver on your site as well. The reason I ask is because the spot price of one ounce gold coins is > 1400$.  
Beta testers/Early adopters of the service are not going to be spending large amounts. You need to get a few users on board for a smaller amount(possibly using smaller coins or sliver), then have them provide reviews and build trust in the community. Once trust is established larger orders will start to come in.  


A great question. We did not think about moving to Silver until you recommended it with your explanation above.

We are going to explore offering Silver as a low-risk entry for individuals to start. We like your approach and agree that with Gold's price heading past $1,400, the turmoil in Ukraine will add to folks seeking refuge in gold. Higher gold prices will make it harder for individuals to test our platform cheaply and with less risk.

I will return next week Monday with confirmation that we have Proof of Custody available in Silver that we can take Silver orders as a way for the community to explore in a low-cost low risk manner. Once we have Proof of Custody confirmed, we will create a process to take small silver orders for the community to test.

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Just a trivial question. Lets talk Bitcoin is launching LTBcoin on counterparty protocol. Should the LTBcoin users have some XCPs in their counterwallet to use LTBcoins?
Not necessarily. However, they may need a very small amount of BTC in that address for transaction fees. (0.0004).
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Just a trivial question. Lets talk Bitcoin is launching LTBcoin on counterparty protocol. Should the LTBcoin users have some XCPs in their counterwallet to use LTBcoins?
Jump to: