[ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 451.

grandpa_seth

sr. member

Activity: 316

Merit: 250

Simcoin Puny Humans Communicator

Quote from: hill on February 23, 2014, 11:42:04 AM

Quote from: zhaochong on February 23, 2014, 08:58:17 AM

Please lower the fee on poloniex when the loss are get back, I want to buy more xcps!

me too, i want to buy more xcp.

For the record I had xcp stuck on poloniex during all this. And I still have it there because busoni has earned my trust. But I believe the fee

is too high for buyers. We want new xcp holders in. My opinion is 2% for sellers and .5% for buyers. Until a reasonable amount has been

recovered for busoni. I do not think necessarily busoni should get 100% recovered. Perhaps do this for the next month and stop regardless

whether you recovered all or less.

ddink7

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: JahPowerBit on February 23, 2014, 10:35:47 AM

Quote from: ddink7 on February 23, 2014, 10:04:03 AM

Jah's GUI worked great last night, but this morning when trying to send XCP I'm getting:

transmit() got an unexpected keyword argument 'ask'

Using latest binaries from firefly.

Sorry for that! i miss one modification in counterpartyd 6.1. I did a push with fix:

https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCP

Thanks! Firefly can you post an updated binary?

hill

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Quote from: zhaochong on February 23, 2014, 08:58:17 AM

Please lower the fee on poloniex when the loss are get back, I want to buy more xcps!

Me too, I want to buy more xcp.

BitzMD

sr. member

Activity: 421

Merit: 250

Quote from: halfcab123 on February 23, 2014, 09:47:59 AM

I'm making how to videos today since there's not gonna be a mainnet Web wallet for probably 3 weeks

This will be greatly appreciated by many. Wink

grandpa_seth

sr. member

Activity: 316

Merit: 250

Simcoin Puny Humans Communicator

Quote from: brenzi on February 23, 2014, 08:20:47 AM

I'm glad to see the first DEX in action, but I'm slightly disappointed by how it is done right now.

Especially the fee-policy seems strange to me. It can't be that a DEX is much more expensive than a centralized one. I see the need for trolling prevention, but what's the point of having a troll-free DEX that is not used because it's too expensive? There is one fundamental problem if users can set the fee required when placing an offer: The market does not necessarily converge to one price. There might be one price for low fees and another for high fees. this makes the whole thing very complicated to use.

And the following DEX features are lacking (or please point me to the docs if I'm not up to date):

minimum match quantity should be selectable when placing an offer. If I want to sell 100x I might not want to to have 100 trades of 1x, especially if the process is not automized
multisig escrow solution. Trading XCP/BTC is ok now because both are built on top of the same blockchain and the protocol can act as the escrow. But If I would like to trade PPC for BTC, how would that work trustlessly?

However: keep going on, the bleeding edge of crypto is exciting....

I so +1 this. Please somebody address all these points. All of these points are concerns of mine as well. These are very important imo.

JahPowerBit

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 255

Counterparty Developer

Quote from: ddink7 on February 23, 2014, 10:04:03 AM

Jah's GUI worked great last night, but this morning when trying to send XCP I'm getting:

transmit() got an unexpected keyword argument 'ask'

Using latest binaries from firefly.

Sorry for that! i miss one modification in counterpartyd 6.1. I did a push with fix:

https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCP

ddink7

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Jah's GUI worked great last night, but this morning when trying to send XCP I'm getting:

transmit() got an unexpected keyword argument 'ask'

Using latest binaries from firefly.

bano.pait

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: halfcab123 on February 23, 2014, 09:47:59 AM

I'm making how to videos today since there's not gonna be a mainnet Web wallet for probably 3 weeks

would be very much useful

halfcab123

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com

I'm making how to videos today since there's not gonna be a mainnet Web wallet for probably 3 weeks

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: nakaone on February 23, 2014, 06:43:33 AM

is there a new send command - the one in the explanation of 520Bit is not working for me any more

C:\Users\xxx>counterpartyd send --from=xxxx--to=
15buRLRW47AY9Md3mpFj17Yp6w4BtfMRjc --quantity=5 --asset=XCP

C:\Users\xxxx>echo off
usage: counterpartyd send [-h] --source SOURCE --destination DESTINATION
--quantity QUANTITY --asset ASSET
counterpartyd send: error: argument --source is required

This is the old version command. You should always check the latest version.
Or use counterpartyd -h to find out all the useful command.

counterpartyd send -h could help you find out how to use send.

zhaochong

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Please lower the fee on poloniex when the loss are get back, I want to buy more xcps!

qqq1q1q1q

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: busoni on February 22, 2014, 09:24:50 PM

Never mind, I just checked the source--it is now create_send.

Hello,busoni

When the volume is 2300BTC,the fee should be enough to fill the blank. And there should be 57.5 BTC and the equivalent value xcp. How to handle them，please give an treatment method.Thank you very much.

watuba

full member

Activity: 211

Merit: 100

WTS 1144 XCP, must buy entire lot

PM me with good offers, and will respond in 6 hours when I wake up.

brenzi

member

Activity: 113

Merit: 10

I'm glad to see the first DEX in action, but I'm slightly disappointed by how it is done right now.

Especially the fee-policy seems strange to me. It can't be that a DEX is much more expensive than a centralized one. I see the need for trolling prevention, but what's the point of having a troll-free DEX that is not used because it's too expensive? There is one fundamental problem if users can set the fee required when placing an offer: The market does not necessarily converge to one price. There might be one price for low fees and another for high fees. this makes the whole thing very complicated to use.

And the following DEX features are lacking (or please point me to the docs if I'm not up to date):

minimum match quantity should be selectable when placing an offer. If I want to sell 100x I might not want to to have 100 trades of 1x, especially if the process is not automized
multisig escrow solution. Trading XCP/BTC is ok now because both are built on top of the same blockchain and the protocol can act as the escrow. But If I would like to trade PPC for BTC, how would that work trustlessly?

However: keep going on, the bleeding edge of crypto is exciting....

peled1986

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1002

Quote from: nakaone on February 23, 2014, 06:43:33 AM

is there a new send command - the one in the explanation of 520Bit is not working for me any more

C:\Users\xxx>counterpartyd send --from=xxxx--to=
15buRLRW47AY9Md3mpFj17Yp6w4BtfMRjc --quantity=5 --asset=XCP

C:\Users\xxxx>echo off
usage: counterpartyd send [-h] --source SOURCE --destination DESTINATION
--quantity QUANTITY --asset ASSET
counterpartyd send: error: argument --source is required

change the word from for the word source
change the word to for the word destination

nakaone

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

is there a new send command - the one in the explanation of 520Bit is not working for me any more

C:\Users\xxx>counterpartyd send --from=xxxx--to=
15buRLRW47AY9Md3mpFj17Yp6w4BtfMRjc --quantity=5 --asset=XCP

C:\Users\xxxx>echo off
usage: counterpartyd send [-h] --source SOURCE --destination DESTINATION
--quantity QUANTITY --asset ASSET
counterpartyd send: error: argument --source is required

qtgwith

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Quote from: cityglut on February 23, 2014, 05:48:33 AM

Quote from: zhaochong on February 23, 2014, 05:42:33 AM

How's going on with online wallet?

xnova plans to release Counterwallet on testnet in about a week. We are then hoping to have at least two weeks of (extensive) testing on testnet.

Excited for this good news.

cityglut

full member

Activity: 216

Merit: 100

Quote from: zhaochong on February 23, 2014, 05:42:33 AM

How's going on with online wallet?

xnova plans to release Counterwallet on testnet in about a week. We are then hoping to have at least two weeks of (extensive) testing on testnet.

zhaochong

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

How's going on with online wallet?

mtbitcoin

legendary

Activity: 876

Merit: 1000

Etherscan.io

Quote from: xnova on February 23, 2014, 02:27:12 AM

Developers: The API has changed a decent amount in the newest updates to the develop branch. This includes several enhancements, function name changes, changes in semantics, etc.

Please check out the updated API documentation at: http://counterpartyd.readthedocs.org/en/develop/API.html

So it looks like a database rebuild is required for the develop commit?

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 451. (Read 1276912 times)