You see it with me then. Nice you admit and clarify your view. I also will not agree that Crypto-bridge is the smallest in the world. Yes it's slow and load all my life but still is better than most exchanges I have used. XDNA being listed on Crypto-bridge as her first exchange listing to be was a big milestone. Suggest new exchanges to the team, otherwise be patient with the team to fulfill those exchanges listed on their roadmap.
I absolutely agree with you. CryptoBridge is good once you learn to master it to some certain degree. For a programmer, it's the best choice. But not for an investor, especially if you mean some serious inverstor with, for example, 10-20 BTC to invest to a single coin. It's too slow, too user-unfriendly, and above all it's just too goddamn little. 200 BTC per day is nothing. No space to grow a market at.
I won't make any moves and suggestions towards the devs, i do believe they have thousands of advisers without me
I just hope they'll list XDNA at some larger exchanges within next half a year. And maybe list it somewhere at some places where ordinary people can grab their dollars, euros or roubles.
Coin listing everywhere do not determine the stability of the project. A good project speaks volume by itself and stand a test of time. If getting XDNA on thousands of exchanges is what determines a good project, I can say there are many shitcoin that get listed on big exchanges, trade a few months and get dump. XDNA needs time to materialize it potential.