That depends where it gets listed. If it gets on Poloniex potentially, however then Evil-Knievel will have to fully dox himself to the Poloniex decision makers since they need devs to be fully verified before even considering adding a coin nowadays. Bittrex also requires full verification so if he doesn't want to do it, you're stuck at yobit/c-cex/cryptopia.
We can easily name someone else as representative. In the end exchanges just want a connection in case something goes wrong in the network.
Well, I am far from anonymous and I have nothing to hide, but I just code and always will ... I do not want to appear as any representative of anything. I have no power to decide anything and I have no ambitions to take any responsibility.
I would love to see someone pull the strings here!
Just a little status update: As promised, I have finished the core client code so it fully supports the super node scheme. It's all in the GIT and all the new tests (Supernode Election and Work Functionality with new Supernode Signatures) work fine. What a weekend ;-) But since it was in the road map it had to be finished.
The new functionality (while running fine in the test benches) works fine, however, before we can test it in the wild, we need actual physical supernodes. This is the next step on the road map list: I will work closely with coralreefer to get some super nodes up and running as quick as possible.