[ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments - page 166.

raoulsergia

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 101

Quote from: tema on January 01, 2018, 08:47:24 AM

Quote from: BuyingFast on January 01, 2018, 07:59:51 AM

Can we please get more votes for RaiBlocks at Binance? https://www.binance.com/vote.html

That's what matters the most right now. Ask your friends to vote for Rai as well.

I can vote/ I register on exchange but not have BNB and other coins/ if someone can send me 0.1 BNB for vote my adress 0x8b6bdb2ac468397ece5423b82c940c058aa25c62

For voting please check the sub or discord, some generous people will donate

tema

hero member

Activity: 715

Merit: 500

Quote from: BuyingFast on January 01, 2018, 07:59:51 AM

Can we please get more votes for RaiBlocks at Binance? https://www.binance.com/vote.html

That's what matters the most right now. Ask your friends to vote for Rai as well.

I can vote/ I register on exchange but not have BNB and other coins/ if someone can send me 0.1 BNB for vote my adress 0x8b6bdb2ac468397ece5423b82c940c058aa25c62

btcsnippers

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

Tnx for the fast reply's guys ill keep waiting and maybe open a ticket on merc . i hope we get on decent exchange soon allready voted for xrb on binance.

R3x

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 11

Quote from: btcsnippers on January 01, 2018, 08:31:53 AM

"Pending Blocks (Waiting for PoW ...)"displayed on the website what does that mean ?

Pending Blocks (Waiting for PoW ...) is supposed to be there.
It's wrong when blocks appear below and don't disappear in a few seconds.
https://github.com/jaimehgb/RaiWebWallet/issues/16

percocet

full member

Activity: 222

Merit: 102

Quote from: btcsnippers on January 01, 2018, 08:31:53 AM

I made a web wallet on raiblocks.net and send some xrb there from exchange but it doesnt arrive and i see "Pending Blocks (Waiting for PoW ...)"displayed on the website what does that mean ? the exchange claims it has been sent but the blockexplorer shows nothing @ my address.

Sounds like the exchange hasn't completed the sending process yet... just wait a bit more and once you see it as sent on the blockexplorer you will be able to pocket it.

btcsnippers

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

I made a web wallet on raiblocks.net and send some xrb there from exchange but it doesnt arrive and i see "Pending Blocks (Waiting for PoW ...)"displayed on the website what does that mean ? the exchange claims it has been sent but the blockexplorer shows nothing @ my address.

R3x

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 11

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 07:54:41 AM

Quote from: sboz on December 31, 2017, 11:29:21 PM

Quote from: cr1pton00b on December 31, 2017, 07:37:54 PM

5. The Man in the Middle attack.

If an attacker succeeds to put himself between a merchant and the RaiBlocks network he can just filter the double spending payment packets, and the merchant will never know that he is receiving a double spending. The Raiblocks network will discard that payment while the merchant will accept it.

Couldn't the same MitM attack be used in a bitcoin transaction? Connect to all the peers of a merchant and mine 6 blocks containing the double spend while filtering out all longer blocks so the merchant accepts the transaction as valid.

No, because if you MITM a bitcoin merchant, you still have to mine 6 blocks with the difficulty bit set by the real network. And the difficulty only decrease by 1/4 every 2015 blocks. It will be impossible for an attacker to have such power.

Maybe you found a security issue so please Join discord https://discordapp.com/invite/JphbBas and discusss the issue with dev (clemahieu [Main dev]) or fill the bounty fourm: https://goo.gl/forms/NX67WDwtoyjLLxg52

CyraxMax

member

Activity: 139

Merit: 10

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 08:12:19 AM

I ask the moderator to remove the posts by percocet and CyraMax to continue with the technical discussion without being interrupted by fanboys. I don't fucking care of the bug hunt reward, i'm the developer of a succesful gaming company and I'm already good with what I'm earning.

I've LOLed at that!

percocet

full member

Activity: 222

Merit: 102

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 08:12:19 AM

I ask the moderator to remove the posts by percocet and CyraMax to continue with the technical discussion without being interrupted by fanboys. I don't fucking care of the bug hunt reward, i'm the developer of a succesful gaming company and I'm already good with what I'm earning.

Sure you are buddy, sure you are.

percocet

full member

Activity: 222

Merit: 102

Quote from: CyraxMax on January 01, 2018, 08:03:38 AM

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 07:54:41 AM

Quote from: sboz on December 31, 2017, 11:29:21 PM

Quote from: cr1pton00b on December 31, 2017, 07:37:54 PM

5. The Man in the Middle attack.

If an attacker succeeds to put himself between a merchant and the RaiBlocks network he can just filter the double spending payment packets, and the merchant will never know that he is receiving a double spending. The Raiblocks network will discard that payment while the merchant will accept it.

Couldn't the same MitM attack be used in a bitcoin transaction? Connect to all the peers of a merchant and mine 6 blocks containing the double spend while filtering out all longer blocks so the merchant accepts the transaction as valid.

No, because if you MITM a bitcoin merchant, you still have to mine 6 blocks with the difficulty bit set by the real network. And the difficulty only decrease by 1/4 every 2015 blocks. It will be impossible for an attacker to have such power.

These asshole fudders are using the fact that they have a little bit more technical knowledge then most of the non technical people to spread their FUD.

It isn't even their own knowledge - they scour these forums and the internet for comments that other people have already posted and have been dismissed ages ago.

In most cases they are direct copy and pastes. I know because I have been following Raiblocks for over a year so I recognize a lot of this FUD as word for word copies of old posts.

cr1pton00b

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

I ask the moderator to remove the posts by percocet and CyraMax to continue with the technical discussion without being interrupted by fanboys. I don't fucking care of the bug hunt reward, i'm the developer of a succesful gaming company and I'm already good with what I'm earning.

CyraxMax

member

Activity: 139

Merit: 10

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 07:54:41 AM

Quote from: sboz on December 31, 2017, 11:29:21 PM

Quote from: cr1pton00b on December 31, 2017, 07:37:54 PM

5. The Man in the Middle attack.

If an attacker succeeds to put himself between a merchant and the RaiBlocks network he can just filter the double spending payment packets, and the merchant will never know that he is receiving a double spending. The Raiblocks network will discard that payment while the merchant will accept it.

Couldn't the same MitM attack be used in a bitcoin transaction? Connect to all the peers of a merchant and mine 6 blocks containing the double spend while filtering out all longer blocks so the merchant accepts the transaction as valid.

No, because if you MITM a bitcoin merchant, you still have to mine 6 blocks with the difficulty bit set by the real network. And the difficulty only decrease by 1/4 every 2015 blocks. It will be impossible for an attacker to have such power.

These asshole fudders are using the fact that they have a little bit more technical knowledge then most of the non technical people to spread their FUD.

percocet

full member

Activity: 222

Merit: 102

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 07:54:41 AM

Quote from: sboz on December 31, 2017, 11:29:21 PM

Quote from: cr1pton00b on December 31, 2017, 07:37:54 PM

5. The Man in the Middle attack.

If an attacker succeeds to put himself between a merchant and the RaiBlocks network he can just filter the double spending payment packets, and the merchant will never know that he is receiving a double spending. The Raiblocks network will discard that payment while the merchant will accept it.

Couldn't the same MitM attack be used in a bitcoin transaction? Connect to all the peers of a merchant and mine 6 blocks containing the double spend while filtering out all longer blocks so the merchant accepts the transaction as valid.

No, because if you MITM a bitcoin merchant, you still have to mine 6 blocks with the difficulty bit set by the real network. And the difficulty only decrease by 1/4 every 2015 blocks. It will be impossible for an attacker to have such power.

Sounds like you found a fatal flaw, you should submit it and collect the bounty. Oh yeah, I forgot, you are just talking out your ass. Nevermind.

BuyingFast

full member

Activity: 230

Merit: 101

Can we please get more votes for RaiBlocks at Binance? https://www.binance.com/vote.html

That's what matters the most right now. Ask your friends to vote for Rai as well.

cr1pton00b

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: sboz on December 31, 2017, 11:29:21 PM

Quote from: cr1pton00b on December 31, 2017, 07:37:54 PM

5. The Man in the Middle attack.

If an attacker succeeds to put himself between a merchant and the RaiBlocks network he can just filter the double spending payment packets, and the merchant will never know that he is receiving a double spending. The Raiblocks network will discard that payment while the merchant will accept it.

https://s18.postimg.org/7pnm6yweh/doublespend.png

Couldn't the same MitM attack be used in a bitcoin transaction? Connect to all the peers of a merchant and mine 6 blocks containing the double spend while filtering out all longer blocks so the merchant accepts the transaction as valid.

No, because if you MITM a bitcoin merchant, you still have to mine 6 blocks with the difficulty bit set by the real network. And the difficulty only decrease by 1/4 every 2015 blocks. It will be impossible for an attacker to have such power.

cr1pton00b

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: CyraxMax on January 01, 2018, 07:31:46 AM

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 07:26:38 AM

Everything I posted is real, there is no fud. MiTm attack has been never addressed and is not listed in the possible scenarios by the dev team.

When I pointed the flaw to the dev team they admitted the problem and asked to open a bug report and no, I,m not interested in bringing down the price. That is just ridiculous.

The main problem here is that a merchant must trust all the incoming data, while Bitcoin PoW makes sure that the incoming data is secure. Raiblocks code is poorly designed. And yeah, hackers hacked yahoo, sony, twitter, linkedin, do you really think it will be difficult to make a MITM attack? You are totally blind.

UDP packets are just welcoming attackers to join the party.

Please note that asking the vote for each traansaction has been proposed by the dev team as a solution to this, but other than the network usage you still have to trust the incoming data, infact you have to reach the 51% of online balance, and who tells you how much is this 51%? YOUR PEERS THAT ARE CONTROLLED BY THE ATTACKER.

And yeah, many people will just be blind and continue with their speculation, but money from the sky doesn't change what you are.

LOOLL, yeah, forgot to mention you. Join the other 3 please and show yourself out Wink

You are not funny, you should explain us how this attack is not possible if you want to shut we up.

migz

member

Activity: 143

Merit: 10

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 07:26:38 AM

Everything I posted is real, there is no fud. MiTm attack has been never addressed and is not listed in the possible scenarios by the dev team.

When I pointed the flaw to the dev team they admitted the problem and asked to open a bug report and no, I,m not interested in bringing down the price. That is just ridiculous.

The main problem here is that a merchant must trust all the incoming data, while Bitcoin PoW makes sure that the incoming data is secure. Raiblocks code is poorly designed. And yeah, hackers hacked yahoo, sony, twitter, linkedin, do you really think it will be difficult to make a MITM attack? You are totally blind.

UDP packets are just welcoming attackers to join the party.

Please note that asking the vote for each traansaction has been proposed by the dev team as a solution to this, but other than the network usage you still have to trust the incoming data, infact you have to reach the 51% of online balance, and who tells you how much is this 51%? YOUR PEERS THAT ARE CONTROLLED BY THE ATTACKER.

And yeah, many people will just be blind and continue with their speculation, but money from the sky doesn't change what you are.

You know so much about the project yet you are a newbie, why not use your real account?

percocet

full member

Activity: 222

Merit: 102

Quote from: djpitagora on January 01, 2018, 07:13:33 AM

Quote from: percocet on January 01, 2018, 06:30:35 AM

Quote from: djpitagora on January 01, 2018, 05:48:56 AM

I'd hate to say but the problems listed are real. There is a fundamental flaw in the design, and it was actually pointed out 2 years ago and completely ignored by the dev. Of course with millions at stake for them it's in their best interest to ignore it. Hell, some kill for less money. Do your due diligence people and don't follow fanboys blindly. As far as I'm concerned right now I pretty certain there is 0% chance XRB will replace BTC. You may speculate and you make still make fortunes on the price, but don't fool yourself of the end result. This is not something that can be just fixed. Sorry.

You literally posted this exact same thing just a few pages back (might have been one of your sock puppet accounts). The "flaws" have been addressed numerous times by the dev - nothing but FUD.

To summarize:

The dev was a software engineer at Qualcom, you are a piece of Bitcointalk trash.

To think that some salty teenage third worlders have found some fatal "flaw" that the Raiblocks dev missed is beyond laughable.

Anyway, as you can see by the price your pathetic FUD attempts are rightfully being ignored by the community.

The fact that you are calling me trash only discredits you. You don't know me. And no offense, some of us are software developers too. I am. So forgive me when I say that I don't really give a **** where the dev works as it says absolutely nothing about him. Qualcom's hiring standards aren't exactly NASA-like, and even if they were everybody is entitled to making mistakes. He's was pointed out two years ago but somehow he beat around the bush with BS explanations, not admitting he made a mistake. In the end everybody gave up as there was no way to reason with him. You can read the thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/block-lattice-1219264

It's not FUD from people that are jealous. There was nothing to be jealous about in 2015 when this was first pointed out.

Wow, so you are a software dev?! Awesome, I've got great news for you - as kamiyama pointed out, there is a bug bounty going on for Raiblocks. Obviously the dev has overlooked some fatal flaws so you just need to tell him what he missed and collect the reward. Of course you would have to prove the bug, not just talk straight out your ass like you have been doing on here.

Go back to your dumpster before the coffee shop shuts down your free wifi.

CyraxMax

member

Activity: 139

Merit: 10

Quote from: cr1pton00b on January 01, 2018, 07:26:38 AM

Everything I posted is real, there is no fud. MiTm attack has been never addressed and is not listed in the possible scenarios by the dev team.

When I pointed the flaw to the dev team they admitted the problem and asked to open a bug report and no, I,m not interested in bringing down the price. That is just ridiculous.

The main problem here is that a merchant must trust all the incoming data, while Bitcoin PoW makes sure that the incoming data is secure. Raiblocks code is poorly designed. And yeah, hackers hacked yahoo, sony, twitter, linkedin, do you really think it will be difficult to make a MITM attack? You are totally blind.

UDP packets are just welcoming attackers to join the party.

Please note that asking the vote for each traansaction has been proposed by the dev team as a solution to this, but other than the network usage you still have to trust the incoming data, infact you have to reach the 51% of online balance, and who tells you how much is this 51%? YOUR PEERS THAT ARE CONTROLLED BY THE ATTACKER.

And yeah, many people will just be blind and continue with their speculation, but money from the sky doesn't change what you are.

LOOLL, yeah, forgot to mention you. Join the other 3 please and show yourself out Wink

cr1pton00b

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Everything I posted is real, there is no fud. MiTm attack has been never addressed and is not listed in the possible scenarios by the dev team.

When I pointed the flaw to the dev team they admitted the problem and asked to open a bug report and no, I,m not interested in bringing down the price. That is just ridiculous.

The main problem here is that a merchant must trust all the incoming data, while Bitcoin PoW makes sure that the incoming data is secure. Raiblocks code is poorly designed. And yeah, hackers hacked yahoo, sony, twitter, linkedin, do you really think it will be difficult to make a MITM attack? You are totally blind.

UDP packets are just welcoming attackers to join the party.

Please note that asking the vote for each traansaction has been proposed by the dev team as a solution to this, but other than the network usage you still have to trust the incoming data, infact you have to reach the 51% of online balance, and who tells you how much is this 51%? YOUR PEERS THAT ARE CONTROLLED BY THE ATTACKER.

And yeah, many people will just be blind and continue with their speculation, but money from the sky doesn't change what you are.

Topic: [ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments - page 166. (Read 775279 times)