Topic: [ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments - page 168. (Read 775179 times)

5 hours ago was made a transaction from exchange to https://raiwallet.com/
but in block explorer there is not unconfirment transation yet and yhe exchange has status paid
https://raiblocks.net/account/index.php?acc=xrb_398kudd8n81ipf7rqza8fw6w7w6momjmuq4tmtqx358t4epwbkw1cd7yi1ap#delegators

in my wallet i have Pending Blocks (Waiting for PoW ...)

It's a scam. Asking for seed = asking for private key

I reported them to a moderator.

-bitblaster

Never give anyone your seed.

You fucking idiot.

They will steal your XRB.

Jesus fucking Christ.

Your Seed is your Private Key.

DO NOT GIVE IT TO ANYONE.

HOW CAN ANYONE BE SO STUPID???

FUCK!!!

Hi,dev, there is an ann announce RBS (Raiblocks Smart) in the btt and they say they are from the XRB dev, and in their web they require seed,i want to know do they really from XRB dev team or they are cheating?

Is there any way to store my Railblocks on a cold wallet?

Or is it rather possible to secure raiwallet access with my Trezor hardware wallet?

I just noticed that this is another lie, official representatives own less than 25% of the total weight.

He has lied to say 52%, which I assumed was the truth in my first rebuttal but on closer scrutiny is another misleading lie



Totalling the weight of all the official reps is much much less than 25%.

The rest of the representatives are all much smaller nodes. There are around 1400 reps.
No representative has more than 11% total weight.


So his statement is a total lie that official reps have 52% of the total voting weight, and the fact that he is posting this across several websites from new and fake account show his intention to create FUD

Congrats mate , glad to see success stories and enjoy the new Year with your new Lambo

My concern is the testing of this crypto. Does anyone knows if Rai was tested already to have at least 1000x transactions per second as it claims to have. I am just trying to understand where is the evidence that what;s written in the papers is actual working in practice ? For me and many non technical folks we need to have a testing phase to see if it works like some coins did for atomic swaps and lightning network. As long as there is no evidence to demonstrate what's claimed by this project all remains just piece of paper and because they are new , they are not that trustful as BTS or DGB are (talking about the same family of coins).

Great points you stated here mate, and as a supporter of raiblocks since the beginning I agree with what you're saying here, but I just like to correct you in a few statements that you said here:

1. When I said he's no way here to be a part of the community, when I said community I don't mean this forum, I meant the people supporting raiblocks, by definition community means a group of people having a particular characteristic in common, so we on here are a community, we're a group of people who's particular characteristic is supporting raiblock and fracas doesn't seem to have that characteristic, I think his posts history will prove that statement of mine.

2. Exactly I couldn't agree more, there are no influencers here but you should know the fact that a huge factor of a coin's success is its community, so if a coin has a lot of supporters it's most likely to succeed, just like what happens to this project, even though it's just being accepted by small exchanges because of it's strong community, we were able to move it forward and we didn't let things happen, we made things happen.

3. I also completely agree problems must be discussed so that the devs will be aware of it and it will just make this coin better and strong in the long run, but fracas isn't always pointing out the problems mate if you've seen his post history then you'll realize that he mostly fuds than points out problems, his posts seems to taunt raiblocks supporters saying "enjoy the collapse",posting a "fake news gif" to people who points out that it's just a correction in the market, I think if he really wants to help this project then he should do it in a mature manner, not like this, maybe in a way @cr1pton00b stated, that's a very mature and professional way of discussing the problems of raiblocks.

I honestly don't have a problem of people pointing out the weak points of raiblocks, because in reality all cryptocurrency have weak points, nothing is prefect, even in the cryptoworld, there will always be a coin much better than this, but I do have a problem with people posting FUD and just postings things that are not even helpful to the raiblocks community, this project is still young there's still more to come this year and there will more development that will make this project so much stronger so to the people spreading FUD don't even bother, it's 2018, time to change now mate.

Alway be aware of Brand New accounts. Someone with technical knowledge has definitely a main account to post from.

-bitblaster

Couldn't the same MitM attack be used in a bitcoin transaction? Connect to all the peers of a merchant and mine 6 blocks containing the double spend while filtering out all longer blocks so the merchant accepts the transaction as valid.

If anything, that seems positive to me. Why would you want to make a coin of which you have so many units worthless by attacking it?

DEAR LORD THANK YOU FOR XRB PAMPZ and HNY TO ALLLLL!!! 

just deciding on orange or lime green lambo paint