XST added to new exchange
https://alt-buddy.com/market?pair=XST/BTC
Topic: [ANN][XST] stealth.org | Quantum Proof of Stake (qPoS) | Tor | Blocknet - page 157. (Read 631079 times)
November 15, 2014, 04:34:54 AM
November 15, 2014, 01:18:19 AM
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
Thanks Hondo!
The suggestions about ito were accepted http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-11-07%20Accountabillity%20-%20Multisig%20Escrow%20of%20Funds.pdf
what about new wallet and anon send?
is there any update about it??
November 15, 2014, 01:16:12 AM
Thanks Hondo!
The suggestions about ito were accepted http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-11-07%20Accountabillity%20-%20Multisig%20Escrow%20of%20Funds.pdf
it really great new to hear, Hondo is the best Dev...The suggestions about ito were accepted http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-11-07%20Accountabillity%20-%20Multisig%20Escrow%20of%20Funds.pdf
+100 for Hondo...
November 15, 2014, 01:12:51 AM
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
Thanks Hondo!
The suggestions about ito were accepted http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-11-07%20Accountabillity%20-%20Multisig%20Escrow%20of%20Funds.pdf
November 15, 2014, 01:00:24 AM
I asked people on slack to post some info from there here.
I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
in Hondo we trust....
yes agreead with him, in XST we trust, we have great team behind XST..
November 15, 2014, 12:56:36 AM
I asked people on slack to post some info from there here.
I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
in Hondo we trust....
November 15, 2014, 12:50:22 AM
I asked people on slack to post some info from there here.
I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
November 15, 2014, 12:41:04 AM
StealthCoin will be removed from IRI vote list.
More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9548155
Thanks to XST community for voting
More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9548155
Thanks to XST community for voting
iriendium iri is nothing but a scam shitty coin with this few shitty rendered images to jump start the hype.
November 14, 2014, 10:52:54 PM
StealthCoin will be removed from IRI vote list.
More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9548155
Thanks to XST community for voting
More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9548155
Thanks to XST community for voting
iriendium iri is nothing but a scam shitty coin with this few shitty rendered images to jump start the hype.
November 14, 2014, 10:27:03 PM
StealthCoin will be removed from IRI vote list.
More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9548155
Thanks to XST community for voting
More info: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9548155
Thanks to XST community for voting
November 14, 2014, 06:18:19 PM
whatever happened to this coin - havent followed in a while but vaguely remember that the stealth send video demos looked promising. What happened?
a fudstorm caused by sociopaths from competing coins
But don't worry that in next weeks things will return to normal
+1000 to that EmilioMann
For the new members and the old that are not following stealthcoin.slack i suggest you pm koontas and ask him to invite you. All your questions will be answered very quickly there by Hondo and the dev team and you will find them a lot more interactive than in the bitcointalk thread.
+1
although I have yet to use slack. I invest in coins that have solid devs. Keyword Invest. Patience to the ones that only talk about price.
No need for constant updates here. Just important updates the community should know about.
November 14, 2014, 06:12:30 PM
Did XST begin booming???
yes 
November 14, 2014, 04:58:24 PM
I'm trying to install the Stealth wallet for my linux mint box, but I get the following error when I compile, am I missing a dependency?
/home/leigh/Desktop/Stealth-master/src/qt/bitcoingui.h:4: error: QMainWindow: No such file or directory
Thanks.
/home/leigh/Desktop/Stealth-master/src/qt/bitcoingui.h:4: error: QMainWindow: No such file or directory
Thanks.
Maybe your OS use Qt5 as default. Try this:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/bin/qmake
make
Yeah i'm using Qt5, I tried that command but I get command not found? I though it was because i'm using a 32 bit system, but I tried changing the 64 in the command to 32but it still game me the same error.
You'll have excuse me i'm not the best when it comes to linux command line.
November 14, 2014, 03:39:25 PM
Does anyone sees what happened just now? 4 btc plus buy on 2363?
Again, i was too slow to buy some
November 14, 2014, 03:36:25 PM
Does anyone sees what happened just now? 4 btc plus buy on 2363?
November 14, 2014, 03:31:52 PM
I'm trying to install the Stealth wallet for my linux mint box, but I get the following error when I compile, am I missing a dependency?
/home/leigh/Desktop/Stealth-master/src/qt/bitcoingui.h:4: error: QMainWindow: No such file or directory
Thanks.
/home/leigh/Desktop/Stealth-master/src/qt/bitcoingui.h:4: error: QMainWindow: No such file or directory
Thanks.
Maybe your OS use Qt5 as default. Try this:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/bin/qmake
make
November 14, 2014, 03:18:06 PM
I'm trying to install the Stealth wallet for my linux mint box, but I get the following error when I compile, am I missing a dependency?
/home/leigh/Desktop/Stealth-master/src/qt/bitcoingui.h:4: error: QMainWindow: No such file or directory
Thanks.
/home/leigh/Desktop/Stealth-master/src/qt/bitcoingui.h:4: error: QMainWindow: No such file or directory
Thanks.
November 14, 2014, 02:32:00 PM
whatever happened to this coin - havent followed in a while but vaguely remember that the stealth send video demos looked promising. What happened?
a fudstorm caused by sociopaths from competing coins
But don't worry that in next weeks things will return to normal
+1000 to that EmilioMann
For the new members and the old that are not following stealthcoin.slack i suggest you pm koontas and ask him to invite you. All your questions will be answered very quickly there by Hondo and the dev team and you will find them a lot more interactive than in the bitcointalk thread.
November 14, 2014, 02:08:09 PM
whatever happened to this coin - havent followed in a while but vaguely remember that the stealth send video demos looked promising. What happened?
a fudstorm caused by sociopaths from competing coins
But don't worry that in next weeks things will return to normal
November 14, 2014, 11:47:15 AM
whatever happened to this coin - havent followed in a while but vaguely remember that the stealth send video demos looked promising. What happened?
Jump to: