Another reason bitcoin will succeed: US to target Putin's $40 billion stash - page 2.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: Peter R on April 22, 2014, 12:18:16 AM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on April 22, 2014, 12:01:32 AM

Haha, great question and I am far from an expert.

My understanding is that there are various clearing houses that manage the balance sheets between banks, and those clearing houses are in turn accountable to the central bank of their respective countries.

Thanks Jonald, that's my understanding too. But I don't have a good handle on exactly who those clearing houses are or how they operate (I thought the big clearing house was SWIFT but I really don't know). So I guess if the US knows that Putin has say $2 billion in Bank X, then with sufficient influence they could tell the clearing houses not to "clear" certain funds, or cut off Bank X completely. Why not?

Yeah it's funny how "no one" really knows how it all works. Even the people at the local bank branch who work for the bank don't know. I'm sure it could be easily researched with all the info that's online today, but isn't it funny how uneducated we are about the global banking system that we all have historically put our trust in ?

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3752

Merit: 1217

Quote from: Littleshop on April 21, 2014, 06:41:33 PM

That is so not true. Russia would not have ever bailed out for more than what was already done. Russia is known for writing off uncollectable debt but not for actual giving out billions to overseas private banks.

From what I've heard Russia offered billions of $$$ to Cyprus for having a naval base in the island. The Cypriot politicians were worried that if they did so, then they'll be kicked out of the Euro Zone. So instead, they stole the money from their citizens' bank accounts.

Peter R

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1007

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on April 22, 2014, 12:01:32 AM

Haha, great question and I am far from an expert.

My understanding is that there are various clearing houses that manage the balance sheets between banks, and those clearing houses are in turn accountable to the central bank of their respective countries.

Thanks Jonald, that's my understanding too. But I don't have a good handle on exactly who those clearing houses are or how they operate (I thought the big clearing house was SWIFT but I really don't know). So I guess if the US knows that Putin has say $2 billion in Bank X, then with sufficient influence they could tell the clearing houses not to "clear" certain funds, or cut off Bank X completely. Why not?

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: Peter R on April 21, 2014, 11:48:03 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on April 21, 2014, 11:36:50 PM

Well probably above my pay grade too, but I'll give my 2 cents anyway as I always do, lol.

SWIFT is mostly just a protocol to help banks find other bank's identities and format payment orders, it is not needed when big money is involved because the central banks have relationships with and can talk directly to other central banks. If US sanctions Russia, I think not being able to use SWIFT codes would be the least of Putin's problems.

Say a bank in London wires $100 million to a Russian bank. And then the Russian bank wires $100 million to a Swiss bank. How does each bank confirm that the "wire" was real? Is there some way to confirm each wire with the Fed? Or do they just have some trust system? Can a bank wire the same money to two different banks? Who checks for double spends? I suppose the underlying asset is a claim on several pieces of paper, but no paper actually moves, correct?

The more I learn the less I know...

Haha, great question and I am far from an expert.

My understanding is that there are various clearing houses that manage the balance sheets between banks, and those clearing houses are in turn accountable to the central bank of their respective countries.

Peter R

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1007

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on April 21, 2014, 11:36:50 PM

Well probably above my pay grade too, but I'll give my 2 cents anyway as I always do, lol.

SWIFT is mostly just a protocol to help banks find other bank's identities and format payment orders, it is not needed when big money is involved because the central banks have relationships with and can talk directly to other central banks. If US sanctions Russia, I think not being able to use SWIFT codes would be the least of Putin's problems.

Say a bank in London wires $100 million to a Russian bank. And then the Russian bank wires $100 million to a Swiss bank. How does each bank confirm that the "wire" was real? Is there some way to confirm each wire with the Fed? Or do they just have some trust system? Can a bank wire the same money to two different banks? Who checks for double spends? I suppose the underlying asset is a claim on several pieces of paper, but no paper actually moves, correct?

The more I learn the less I know...

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Well probably above my pay grade too, but I'll give my 2 cents anyway as I always do, lol.

SWIFT is mostly just a protocol to help banks find other bank's identities and format payment orders, it is not needed when big money is involved because the central banks have relationships with and can talk directly to other central banks. If US sanctions Russia, I think not being able to use SWIFT codes would be the least of Putin's problems.

Peter R

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Siegfried on April 21, 2014, 09:39:38 PM

Quote from: Kiwigoeswest on April 21, 2014, 09:23:07 PM

Lol, V Putin can easily holds his assets in one of the Russian based banks. He even open account in a bank that was sanctioned and now this bank said they are going to operate in rubbles only. China and Russia are about to topple dollar and they are likely to promote yuan and rubble.

Putin was not the best example. A better one would have been an oligarch who has to fear not only U.S. sanctions but Putin himself.

Yes, Putin just happens to be in the spotlight in a way that will get other elite thinking about the likelihood of their own wealth being seized.

But I wouldn't actually say he's that bad of an example either. Putin can continue to hold his ruble assets in Russian banks. But I believe a lot of other financial assets could still be targeted. This is over my pay grade, but I think USD moved into Russian banks could be frozen by sanctions affecting the bank's access to the SWIFT network, correct? If you don't have access to SWIFT, I think you are limited to trading physical US $100 dollar bills and old US treasury bearer bonds (which the US stopped selling in 1982 "because their anonymous nature made them a haven for tax evaders").

kingscrown

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

http://fuk.io - check it out!

i doubt he understands BTC or cares about it.

Peter R

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1007

Quote from: twiifm on April 21, 2014, 07:54:12 PM

Buying BTC is not a hedge against demise of USD. If you think USD will fall then you should short USD. If you think BTC will rise then you should long BTC. There is no correlation as a trade.

Twiifm: "I'll show those greedy bitcoiners. I'm gonna short BTC/USD but I'll diversify by going long USD/BTC since there is no correlation. Mu ha ha ha."

Siegfried

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: Kiwigoeswest on April 21, 2014, 09:23:07 PM

Lol, V Putin can easily holds his assets in one of the Russian based banks. He even open account in a bank that was sanctioned and now this bank said they are going to operate in rubbles only. China and Russia are about to topple dollar and they are likely to promote yuan and rubble.

Putin was not the best example. A better one would have been an oligarch who has to fear not only U.S. sanctions but Putin himself.

Kiwigoeswest

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Lol, V Putin can easily holds his assets in one of the Russian based banks. He even open account in a bank that was sanctioned and now this bank said they are going to operate in rubbles only. China and Russia are about to topple dollar and they are likely to promote yuan and rubble.

Littleshop

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1004

Quote from: twiifm on April 21, 2014, 07:54:12 PM

Buying BTC is not a hedge against demise of USD. If you think USD will fall then you should short USD. If you think BTC will rise then you should long BTC. There is no correlation as a trade

Says the NYC financial industry. They want to keep you paying in their court.

To say that Bitcoin is not a possible hedge against the dropping dollar means you do not understand Bitcoin.

Siegfried

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: twiifm on April 21, 2014, 07:01:15 PM

@ Peter R

That analysis has so many flaws

(1) You assume that Bob has only 2 choices (BTC yes or no) when he could diversify his portfolio in many asset classes

(2) Standard deviation is determined by using historical data not random numbers projected into the future

(3) Probability isn't randomly calculated like that. 5% lose all money vs 95% not lose all money? Say what?

(4) I think someone else defined "store of value" = low volatility. I'm not sure how you are defining "store of value". Sounds like you are saying BTC is a store of value because it could go to x20 or not. This sounds like a "speculative" bet not a "store of value" bet. You are speculating that demise of USD will drive up BTC price.

(5) Buying BTC is not a hedge against USD. That's not how hedges work. A hedge is when you take trade AND you also take the opposite of that trade to mitigate your risk. The easiest way to hedge is using options. But there is no options market on BTC so the point is moot

"but I have never found a rational case where it is not wise to store at least a small portion of your wealth in bit coin"

How about in the case the price crashes and you lose your money? If you have the assumption BTC will forever go up in price then by all means invest. But don't claim that the price can't crash or even go to zero.

Bitcoin is the only asset class with its extraordinarily useful attributes. In terms of portability, security, spendability, transferability, and divisibility, Bitcoin is miles better than gold, gems, real estate, rare art, or any other asset I can think of.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: twiifm on April 21, 2014, 08:11:27 PM

People were worried they couldn't get their money

EXACTLY.

twiifm

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on April 21, 2014, 08:00:32 PM

its not just propoganda though...look what happened to BTC during cypress.

if the USD falls, it will be the financial news of the century,
and it is quite likely there will be a massive interest in bitcoin.

That's due to a bank run. Had nothing to do with failure of Euro. People were worried they couldn't get their money out of the banks if banks became insolvent.

The reason there was a crisis in Cyprus is because their debt is denominated in Euros and ECB didn't bail them out

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: twiifm on April 21, 2014, 07:54:12 PM

I think the only reason you believe there is a correlation of BTC & USD is because the propaganda of BTC is anti-Central Banking.

If there is no correlation then it is still useful for diversification. Negative correlation would be better, of course, but zero correlation makes his argument valid as well.

In order to argue that it isn't useful for diversification you would have to show it has perfect correlation.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

its not just propoganda though...look what happened to BTC during cypress.

if the USD falls, it will be the financial news of the century,
and it is quite likely there will be a massive interest in bitcoin.

twiifm

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Quote from: Peter R on April 21, 2014, 07:09:24 PM

Quote from: twiifm on April 21, 2014, 07:01:15 PM

@ Peter R That analysis has so many flaws...

The analysis was hugely simplified to illustrate the benefit of hedging using simple math. I explained that in the post.

I also showed that even if you assign a 95% probability to the value of bitcoin going to zero, it can still be useful as part of a wealth-preservation strategy.

That's not how probabilities work though. You didn't show anything except you made up some random numbers and drew conclusions from them.

All you said was if you invested 5% of your portfolio in BTC today it could return 20X or zero. You came up w 5% because you believe thats an appropriate amount of risk attributed to random probabilities 5% vs 95%.

Buying BTC is not a hedge against demise of USD. If you think USD will fall then you should short USD. If you think BTC will rise then you should long BTC. There is no correlation as a trade

It's actually hard to price USD without being paired to something. Its easier if you compaired BTC to gold or some other commodity so you can analyze the prices in USD. Throw up 2 charts and see if there is correlation or not.

I think the only reason you believe there is a correlation of BTC & USD is because the propaganda of BTC is anti-Central Banking. BTC pumpers always talk about demise of fiat money. Gold pumpers say the same thing to pump gold price.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

True.

I think the distinction here is the negative correlation.

Using twiifm's strict definition of opposite positions on the same instrument,
there is 100% negative correlation.

However, there is still strong counter correlation for a denominated
asset (Gold or Bitcoin).

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

A slightly better word than hedge is diversification. Diversification is valuable even if the asset you are diversifying from has higher expected return. In fact that is always the case, otherwise you would allocate 100% to the one asset with the highest expected return.

Topic: Another reason bitcoin will succeed: US to target Putin's $40 billion stash - page 2. (Read 5814 times)