Pages:
Author

Topic: Antminer D3 Blissz firmware (10/12 v1.12 update) - page 3. (Read 125923 times)

newbie
Activity: 72
Merit: 0
Hi Blissz,

I am basically new to mining. I already have v1.12 in my D3. Yesterday I tried 2.06 but found the miner was rebooting in short intervals moreover, X appears on two of slot on different locations. Then i returned back to v 1.12 and now normal.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Something like that for s9?
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Hi,

Please, anybody has firmware for D3 from Nov 2?

Thanks
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
why I have high hw error when switching pool? sometimes over 1.000 hw error
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Can you make the check ability if the dev fee pools are dead, not to switch until the come back online?

I'm pretty sure this is by design otherwise you could just put reject outbound firewall rules on his dev pool ports on your home router...
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Hi,

If I update the firmware of my D3, will it clear my assigned static ip on the device after the upgrade?

Thanks in advance

All Good, I tried and luckily it did not cleared my static IP set on my D3, Thanks guys
full member
Activity: 218
Merit: 100
Quote
Show me the part where say clearly that you must publish this code, when it is not finish or in development stage.
It's literally at the top off all the cgminer source code.

/*
 * Copyright 2011-2017 Con Kolivas
 * Copyright 2011-2015 Andrew Smith
 * Copyright 2011-2012 Luke Dashjr
 * Copyright 2010 Jeff Garzik
 *
 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
 * Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at your option)
 * any later version.  See COPYING for more details.
 */

Here's a dumbed-down version on the GPL3 license:
https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-general-public-license-v3-(gpl-3)

I know the GNU v3 and it say that you must make it public,
but it´s not saying that you must make it public in Beta stage or before it´s finish.
Until now we are all beta tester.
Think what will be happen when he publish a work in progress with an BIG error and someone know how to compile and make the Image and destroy his Miner.
Don´t think everyone here in the Forum is to stupid to make a working Version of source.

Or you only want to see the source, that you can see how he make all this things?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Hi guys,

I really would like to have other algorithm support on the D3 as well, so here is an update from what I've experienced so far:

I tried to isolate a single algorithm / other algorithms, but not yet succeeded. There are some parameters to tweak with, which seem to change something in the ASICS, but the problem is that even if it switches to another algorithm (which I am not 100% sure), you can't know which one... It's also not that straightforward to change the linux part to support another algorithm, so it's easy to make a small mistake there as well.
If I had some inside information that for example groestl is 100% for sure supported then it would be easier to go 100% for that. Now there are too many variables to play with.
I still have some ideas left to try: I want to build an automated matrix test that tries all parameter combinations and tries to verify it against all known algorithms. It will be quite an effort to build this, but I think it's the only possibility to find out if it's possible.

Blissz, so you can be 100% sure which algorithms are supported by x11. Here is a list.

blake

bmw

groestl

jh

keccak

skein

luffa

cubehash

shavite

simd

echo

X12, X13, X14, X15 and X17 are all exactly the same but with additional algorithms added in. Out of all the X11 algorithms listed above groestl should currently be the most profitable even at a severely reduced hash rate. If possible, I would try to focus on groestl first and then skein as a 2nd alternative. Cracking this problem of isolating a single algo is something that I believe many of us would be willing to support financially in a big way as we would all benefit in a big way.


These are fpga chips folks. no excuses. this is free money for little work. he probably had this done in one week and just sucked you for your time and money. This firmward doesn't benefit any. Unless you can actually "program" those programmable asic chips..  oh and fck that i ain't paying. we'll bill bitmain.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
I also have one asic with 55 not 60. Sometimes it goes to 57 or 54. Also i have a lot of HW errros like 50 per second. But i know that it does not matter too much. I can see actually at the pool what's going on. So i suggest you check the pool for hashrate.
Some HW errors are not a problem. One of my boards is going to die but i will keep until it stops totally. Then i am going to change capacitors at the last row. I think they may be the problem for not supplying steady voltage.

stangerm2 -
User 'stangerm2' has not chosen to allow messages from newbies. You should post in their relevant thread to remind them to enable this setting.


newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Ok, so I`ve been running this software for few days and got some troubles.

There are some days when  I`ve got 0 HW errors on all chains and antminier works like a charm. On the other hand in few minutes I can have lot of HW. Then I reboot antminer and I have HW errors on other chain. Then another reboot and different chain goes crazy with HW errors (ofc freq and voltage stays the same).

Sometimes I lost one of chains, then I have to wait some time, start machine again and everything is OK.

I`m using v1.12 :: 10/12 firmware.

Anyone is having similar problems?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Can I directly flash my D3 unit to the latest mod v1.12 :: 10/12 (https://mega.nz/#!ylJX0LCQ!8JWryI0jDhgMvPdH2mrOvybkXCtrpYtQpxu0akdxU1s) ?

Or is there any intermediate mod that I need to upgrade to first?

Thanks!

You can do it directly. Your writing a new image to flash, it's not a file based upgrade.

Thank you!
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Quote
stangerm2 - allow private messages if you do not mind.
I allow them but as a noobie I'm throttled I believe on the amount of messages I can send/receive.

Quote
Anyway publishing the code and be honest is perfectly fine too.
I can't publish the code because I don't have the code, or I don't have Blissz's modified code. I only have Bitmains code fork and kolivas's master branch. With that I have a disassembled Hex dump of Blissz binary, which I was able to compare with the known published versions and add symbols back until I figured out how he was switching pools . All I can do is publish the assembly code (which I will) with modifications that take out certain bits of the raw .exe if you will.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Quote
When you really want to do it, i will not use your software, because is useless for me. not working with 8 or more pools.

I don't care, I have nothing to gain. This is about doing whats right.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
stangerm2 - allow private messages if you do not mind.
I think one time dev fee is okay or at least it should be on 24 hours
so you do not stop each 2 hours loosing speed.
Anyway publishing the code and be honest is perfectly fine too.
At least this is what i think.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Quote
Show me the part where say clearly that you must publish this code, when it is not finish or in development stage.
It's literally at the top off all the cgminer source code.

/*
 * Copyright 2011-2017 Con Kolivas
 * Copyright 2011-2015 Andrew Smith
 * Copyright 2011-2012 Luke Dashjr
 * Copyright 2010 Jeff Garzik
 *
 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
 * Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at your option)
 * any later version.  See COPYING for more details.
 */

Here's a dumbed-down version on the GPL3 license:
https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-general-public-license-v3-(gpl-3)
full member
Activity: 218
Merit: 100
Blissz - You are breaking the law, cgminer is 'GNU General Public License' program. Turning it into one for your own profit and not pushing it back to ckolivas or opening it up on github is illegal under the copyright. I understand you worked hard on it and did a great job. I get that you want to be compensated and you can still have a dev fee for you pre-built binary but you CAN'T keep ignoring the licence by having the source code closed. You need to push your code back up or openly host it. You don't have to take your mining fee out and you don't have to provide building instructions but you need to honor the open source license or I'm going to do it for you. No one here is going to know how to cross compile it and then build it back into initramfs. They can barely setup there miners in the first place. Since you've always ignored me I'm going to make this super clear now. Do the right thing, push your code, or I will re-release all your Firmware, without the miner fee. IE. by injecting assembly branching operations into the compiled cgminer where the switch_pools functions execute we can skip any pool greater than 2. You have a week and them I'm going to post my Blissz modded version just like you did to Bitmain(at least there code is hosted though).... I really wish you could have just done the right thing to start with.

Bump 6 days Blissz
Just to say this, publishing code that is not yours is illegal, too. It´s not important that the original code is GNU. When you really do it you break the law, too.
I can understand you, but this is not the right way, too
When you really want to do it, i will not use your software, because is useless for me. not working with 8 or more pools.

Show me the part where say clearly that you must publish this code, when it is not finish or in development stage.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Blissz - You are breaking the law, cgminer is 'GNU General Public License' program. Turning it into one for your own profit and not pushing it back to ckolivas or opening it up on github is illegal under the copyright. I understand you worked hard on it and did a great job. I get that you want to be compensated and you can still have a dev fee for you pre-built binary but you CAN'T keep ignoring the licence by having the source code closed. You need to push your code back up or openly host it. You don't have to take your mining fee out and you don't have to provide building instructions but you need to honor the open source license or I'm going to do it for you. No one here is going to know how to cross compile it and then build it back into initramfs. They can barely setup there miners in the first place. Since you've always ignored me I'm going to make this super clear now. Do the right thing, push your code, or I will re-release all your Firmware, without the miner fee. IE. by injecting assembly branching operations into the compiled cgminer where the switch_pools functions execute we can skip any pool greater than 2. You have a week and them I'm going to post my Blissz modded version just like you did to Bitmain(at least there code is hosted though).... I really wish you could have just done the right thing to start with.

Bump 6 days Blissz

if you push the software to Bitmain, then i hope a lightning will hit you straight in the ass while you are takin a shit!

it is one thing to lay the firmware open without the fee, because of the GPL and Blissz not reacting to ur ultimatum.

but giving it to bitmain would be a real shitmove!
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Can I directly flash my D3 unit to the latest mod v1.12 :: 10/12 (https://mega.nz/#!ylJX0LCQ!8JWryI0jDhgMvPdH2mrOvybkXCtrpYtQpxu0akdxU1s) ?

Or is there any intermediate mod that I need to upgrade to first?

Thanks!

You can do it directly. Your writing a new image to flash, it's not a file based upgrade.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Can I directly flash my D3 unit to the latest mod v1.12 :: 10/12 (https://mega.nz/#!ylJX0LCQ!8JWryI0jDhgMvPdH2mrOvybkXCtrpYtQpxu0akdxU1s) ?

Or is there any intermediate mod that I need to upgrade to first?

Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Blissz - You are breaking the law, cgminer is 'GNU General Public License' program. Turning it into one for your own profit and not pushing it back to ckolivas or opening it up on github is illegal under the copyright. I understand you worked hard on it and did a great job. I get that you want to be compensated and you can still have a dev fee for you pre-built binary but you CAN'T keep ignoring the licence by having the source code closed. You need to push your code back up or openly host it. You don't have to take your mining fee out and you don't have to provide building instructions but you need to honor the open source license or I'm going to do it for you. No one here is going to know how to cross compile it and then build it back into initramfs. They can barely setup there miners in the first place. Since you've always ignored me I'm going to make this super clear now. Do the right thing, push your code, or I will re-release all your Firmware, without the miner fee. IE. by injecting assembly branching operations into the compiled cgminer where the switch_pools functions execute we can skip any pool greater than 2. You have a week and them I'm going to post my Blissz modded version just like you did to Bitmain(at least there code is hosted though).... I really wish you could have just done the right thing to start with.

Bump 6 days Blissz

Sounds really fair play. At least one time fee or one time per 24 hours is good ebough i think. Also nobody can compile this alone.
Pages:
Jump to: