on the S1 the right side was board 1 left side board 2. I would assume its the same for the S3
Thanks!
Anyone know if replacing heat sink compound generally helps relatively high HW%? I just installed a couple S3+ and one is great, but the other is running about .02% HW (much higher than any of my S3s) plus it's also very sluggish to gather speed. (August 26 FW and cfgminer 4.6.0 in all.)
PS. I'm thinking this is one S3+ which is happier as an S3 at 218.75MHz -- rapid speed attainment and low HW%.
PPS. To Whom It May Concern -- The Aug 26 FW release definitely includes the 243.75 MHz clock!
I don't have a pre-thermal paste change stats saved to compare but a problem S3 that has seen its heat sink compound changed runs at much lower HW errors than my good S3 but has tailing off hashrate. Not sure how important it is as my two S3+'s have starkly different HW errors both running 1 day 20 hours, 452.17GH/s HW 3,974, Utility 17 & 453.61GH/s HW 153 Utility 17. Online the machine having the higher HW errors and slightly lower hashrate has more shares, roughly 2.3% more shares.