Author

Topic: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread - page 247. (Read 710164 times)

newbie
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
In the meantime I'd like to know about the pool setup if running a couple of Antminers. From the S3 manual I can see it supports three mining pools and three pool balance options (Failover / Balance / Load Balance).

Can anyone please advise a strategy when running a couple of Antminers?

I guess most will just leave the default balance option (Failover)?
Let's say you have 6 Antminers, do you let them mine each on a separate pool?

I have been wondering this also. Is is bad to to use the same pool and same worker ID for 3 seperate miners? Should each miner if using the same pool, use a different worker ID?
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Wanna buy a Tesla? Visit TeslaBargain.com first!
In the meantime I'd like to know about the pool setup if running a couple of Antminers. From the S3 manual I can see it supports three mining pools and three pool balance options (Failover / Balance / Load Balance).

Can anyone please advise a strategy when running a couple of Antminers?

I guess most will just leave the default balance option (Failover)?
Let's say you have 6 Antminers, do you let them mine each on a separate pool?
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Wanna buy a Tesla? Visit TeslaBargain.com first!
@BITMAIN, everybody here is waiting for a statement on this issue, so this is really something serious that has to be addressed.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
Welcome to dogietalk.bs
Hi BITMAIN.

As you're an official representative of bitmain, may I ask you to please provide the source code for your modifications to cgminer in the form of the driver for the S3. cgminer is provided under the GPL version 3 license which means you are obliged by law to provide the source code to any modifications you do if you distribute binaries and you are distributing modified cgminer binaries with every S3.

Provision of the source code would allow us to aid the development of your driver and help bring your version to sync up with the latest cgminer to derive the benefits of newer versions along with its many fixes.

Bumping this

BITMAIN - A couple questions please:

1)  Why do you continue to ignore the request by the cgminer developers to release your code as you are morally & legally required to do so under the GPLv3 License Agreement?

2)  The cgminer software that you are deploying ILLEGALLY with your software has SEVERE security flaws, including the stratum redirect issue - why are you NOT implementing the latest version to eliminate these issues?

These and other questions have been asked many times by many people across this forum, but you continue to ignore them, refusing to even comment, and by doing so you are not only breaking the law, but you are also demonstrating massive contempt towards the cgminer developers & the Open Source Community as well as creating suspicion as to your reasons/motives within the Bitcoin Community.

Until you decide to capitulate & do the honorable & legally binding - and above all, the RIGHT thing - I and others on this forum will continue to pursue a response/reply to the above questions.

I urge everyone on this forum to do the same, not only out of respect & gratitude to the cgminer developers who have given so much to the Bitcoin community FOR FREE under the GPLv3 Licensing Terms, but also to ensure the security of your own extremely vulnerable mining equipment purchased from Bitmain.

Thank you.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
I do wish the BITMAIN would publish the device driver details so that a current version of cgminer could be attained. I know at least 2 releases in 4 had notes about queue improvements and one at least specifically stated it generated work much faster. Also one of the last 3's had an improvement about how work was loaded into devices. I know for sure 3.12 is very old and I am positive that many work generation improvements have been added since then.

Exactly. I don't understand why they don't work more closely with the cgminer devs - using such an old miner for this equipment is false economy. There have been many improvements & optimixations since this cgminer release, not to mention a very important fix for work redirection by a third party.
Can we just SSH in to it and compile CGMiner to a newer version ?
One would assume that we have access to their modified code and driver for cgminer which the cgminer license stipulates, however they have ignored our requests for making that code available. I am considering what direction to take now about that license violation.

Indeed, I saw your post requesting access to the code - ignoring it seems a very strange course of action by Bitmain, especially since agreeing & cooperating would not only benefit everyone - but would also stay within the legally binding license terms.......

I hope they realize their error & do the right thing - as well as live up to their claim of supporting the Bitcoin community.

@ckolivas: Is there anything we, the community, can do to help? Maybe if we all started mailing them they will take notice?
I for one am not buying any more equipment from Bitmain until this is taken care of. I often wondered what if a person could skim off a very small percent of hashing on equipment and get away with it not being noticed. Makes a person wonder.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Anyone with the  B7 shipping status so far?
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
freecrypto.top
Are there any S3's left for sale anywhere?Huh

Might be doing yourself a favor not finding any. Batch 5 at .64 when btc was about 600 each = about $385 USD, S3+ = .58 at about 500 each or $290 USD now. As of now you could have bought the .2 bitcoins and been in que to get the S3+. Depending on ship date you may end up being a lot better off in the S3+ batch anyways, especially if the hardware is built/assembled better.

I was thinking of getting some S3+ but with the uncertainty, the potential new chip around corner (if its not a scam) The cgiminer thing, I decided to hold off on anymore hardware, buy some btc direct.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Are there any S3's left for sale anywhere?Huh

S3+ is available from Bitmain on 20th September
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
Are there any S3's left for sale anywhere?Huh
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
That is suspicious on 3333. How did you notice this? I'm going to cap a bit with Wireshark. Is your pool on 3333? I'm guessing it's not or you would not have mentioned this. It would be very unusual for DNS traffic on that port as mjk mentioned. It's probably nothing.

Just run netstat from the ssh console. It shows you all current connections. I have actually figured out it is related to the btcguild pool, if I drop packets going to the networkcentral range the btcguild pool starts showing up as dead. I can't really figure out how it is related, because none of the btcguild addresses I find seem to be anywhere near that range.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
As a first time antminer buyer.. i'd love a coupon!
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Wanna buy a Tesla? Visit TeslaBargain.com first!
So if anyone here has one or more coupons available and would be so generous to give them away for free, please send me a PM!

Looks like begging, but what the heck, if you let them expire you are gifting their value to Bitmaintech, as if they would need it more than a fellow forum comrade. I at least would be thankful! Wink
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
anyone got some coupons for sale?
Or just to give away for free, after all there is no point if not using them yourself anyway and just letting them expire...  Wink

yes, I wouldnt mind getting one for free. Smiley
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Wanna buy a Tesla? Visit TeslaBargain.com first!
anyone got some coupons for sale?
Or just to give away for free, after all there is no point if not using them yourself anyway and just letting them expire...  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
anyone got some coupons for sale?
grn
sr. member
Activity: 357
Merit: 252
If you place an order at Bitmaintech, when do you have to pay?

pay immediately, they expect the transaction to clear within 1 hour. sometimes it takes longer and your order will show as invalid but they fix that within a day.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Wanna buy a Tesla? Visit TeslaBargain.com first!
If you place an order at Bitmaintech, when do you have to pay?
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'



Used the Advanced Tab and set the Freq to 250M. The Hash Rate raised a great deal though it does fluctuate a good bit. Should I be worried with the HW rate? What is considered too high of a HW?




1% or less for hw is fine

HW/DiffA+Diffr+HW

for you 13/544,562+ 1665+13 = way less then 1%
grn
sr. member
Activity: 357
Merit: 252
Thank you Spondoolies Tech BITMAIN for helping me earn more BTC/day today than I did 11 months ago despite the huge difficulty difference!
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I have a question about the stratum difficulty.  I have two Antminer S3s, and I'm using the GHash.IO mining pool.  Their FAQ says:
Quote
The optimal settings of the stratum difficulty depends on your hash-rate:
16+ GH/s - 16 difficulty
32+ Gh/s - 32 difficulty
64+ GH/s - 64 difficulty
128+ GH/s - 128 difficulty
256+ GH/s - 256 difficulty
512+ GH/s - 512 difficulty
1 TH/s - 1024 difficulty

So based on that, the setting would be 256 for each miner.  Does anyone actually alter this setting in their mining pool?  Or do you just keep the default setting?

thank you.
I don't think it's for each miner (unless you have them as different workers). If they're set as one worker, then set it to 512 (or 1TH if you can get it stable over 1000 GH/s). If they're separate workers then yea, 256 should be fine.

But Yes it works in every pool I've tried (4 or 5 different pools)

They are set up with different worker IDs.  I thought that was required.  I didn't know I could have two miners in the same pool with the same worker ID.  Does that work?  Is there an advantage to doing that?

No... It's hard to see/track your individual S3's performance...

I'm using separate workers for each of mine S3's ...256 diff... Grin

ZiG

But Yes it works in every pool I've tried (4 or 5 different pools)

Stratum difficulty can be "forced" on some pools (Ghash for instance) on others it typically is calculated and/or set by the pool (Eligius).
This is normally set on an even bit boundry (16, 32, 64, 128, etc. . . .)
We are currently hashing on a pool that calculates, over time, a precise difficulty for each worker that does not necessarily fall on an even bit boundry.
We are seeing Stratum difficulty raging from 281.07 to 454.57 on our 12 S1's and 796.60 to 1084.24 on our 12 S3's.
We see, when implementing a new miner, this pool defaults to 512 and adjusts that value over time.

I think I'm seeing less stale, Dup, and low difficulty rejects as a result.
But am reticent to make a definitive statement as too the observation.

Does this makes sense, Oh Great and Knowledgeable Stratum Guru's?
Jump to: