Author

Topic: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread - page 272. (Read 710164 times)

legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
Let me know how that Freq goes. Mine never averaged over 440 at 231.25.
225 was actually higher GH/s for me. Yeah.. it was strange. No HW errors, but 225 ended up being better. I may try it again.



new set of numbers:




here is a little reminder for us     well  for me.

vi /etc/config/asic-freq

cause I got a new one to try!!


I got a working freq!!!!  


231.25     just started testing it

lets hope it works for some:




newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Way to go BITMAIN.

You sent me an S1 controller board instead of an S3.  Unless there's something I need to do to get this working.

I got in to configure, and also updated the firmware to the latest you have posted.  However on the status screen, it says the frequencies are 350 (like an S1, not 218.75 like it should be for an S3).  It's reporting twice the number of ASICs, but half of them are x's.  And hash speed is all 0.

Does anyone have any idea how to reprogram this so it'll work as an S3??  Or am I going to have to wait another 2 weeks while they send the RIGHT part for the unit that wasn't working right out of the box??

Another 2 weeks.  Another diff.  Sheesh.

At least my other 2 units are working reasonably well (although they're now hashing at around 220 GH/s - consistently.  Well below what was promised.)


I suggest emailing them. In my own experience I have had great success with replies from Bitmain. They might even have a solution for your issues. So far so good with my S3s (got 8 with 3 more on the way) +2 S2s in my small but growing farm. They have been consistently reliable with shipping sometimes shipping before the promised date. Their support generally is good. Just a thought. Of course speaking about my own experience. That might not be the same for everyone else. Just speaking for myself here.

Oh, I've already emailed them.  This post was more of a rant/call for help in case there is anyone there who has a suggestion.  I won't hear from Bitmain until later tonight given the time difference.

And I supposed to other miner manufacturers their support could be considered good.  However, my unit's network interface was dead right out of the box and unlike manufacturers of other high-end cost-sensitive and mission critical hardware, they do not have the option to advance ship the replacemnt, resulting in more downtime while waiting for the faulty part to get to them (I won't rehash that here any more, my opinion in earlier posts is well known).

I'm just a lot frustrated because it's more than 2 weeks now and this thing is still not earning for me.

I suspect the controller boards are quite similar (looks practically identical), so I am guessing it might just be a matter of changing configuration files.  But I'm not that experienced yet with configuring miners, so I'd rather defer to more experienced forum members or Bitmain themselves if it's possible to just update some files and get it working without having to send it back AGAIN.

legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1077
^ Will code for Bitcoins
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

lol 50 ph in variance Smiley


Just to make it clear for you how many times has the network gone to say 50k from 100k. If you think the actual hashrate is varying? ( yes it will vary if someone brings new equipment online or takes it off, or chips vary slightly. )  That isn't luck lol.

You are not going to see for example your home hardware spiking from 440 ( on an s3 ) to 660 and to 220 for any length of time, much less everyone's at once.

Made me smile though.

Edit-

I am very curious though who/what/where it was.  Will probably find out soon if it wasn't any of the major equipment vendors testing.   Would be interesting to see it stay up for a while then we start to get a slew of complaints x vendor just shipped me dusty used equipment.  Then again it could be some cloud mining operation setting up in Iceland finally and getting it right.

Of course that can't be variance, but why all those conspiracy theories? Isn't it obvious who turned those 50PH off?
Hints:
* not all mining is done in large datacenters;
* there are (were) tons of Avalons, AsicMiners, etc, miners out there who mine(d) with some combination of free/low cost electricity
* what can you do if you have those dinosaur, near extinct, miners when one large hashrate increase signals you it's just not worth it to run them any more?

Why search for conspiracy theories which datacenter turned off 50PH, when there is simple logical explanation?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Way to go BITMAIN.

You sent me an S1 controller board instead of an S3.  Unless there's something I need to do to get this working.

I got in to configure, and also updated the firmware to the latest you have posted.  However on the status screen, it says the frequencies are 350 (like an S1, not 218.75 like it should be for an S3).  It's reporting twice the number of ASICs, but half of them are x's.  And hash speed is all 0.

Does anyone have any idea how to reprogram this so it'll work as an S3??  Or am I going to have to wait another 2 weeks while they send the RIGHT part for the unit that wasn't working right out of the box??

Another 2 weeks.  Another diff.  Sheesh.

At least my other 2 units are working reasonably well (although they're now hashing at around 220 GH/s - consistently.  Well below what was promised.)


I suggest emailing them. In my own experience I have had great success with replies from Bitmain. They might even have a solution for your issues. So far so good with my S3s (got 8 with 3 more on the way) +2 S2s in my small but growing farm. They have been consistently reliable with shipping sometimes shipping before the promised date. Their support generally is good. Just a thought. Of course speaking about my own experience. That might not be the same for everyone else. Just speaking for myself here.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Way to go BITMAIN.

You sent me an S1 controller board instead of an S3.  Unless there's something I need to do to get this working.

I got in to configure, and also updated the firmware to the latest you have posted.  However on the status screen, it says the frequencies are 350 (like an S1, not 218.75 like it should be for an S3).  It's reporting twice the number of ASICs, but half of them are x's.  And hash speed is all 0.

Does anyone have any idea how to reprogram this so it'll work as an S3??  Or am I going to have to wait another 2 weeks while they send the RIGHT part for the unit that wasn't working right out of the box??

Another 2 weeks.  Another diff.  Sheesh.

At least my other 2 units are working reasonably well (although they're now hashing at around 220 GH/s - consistently.  Well below what was promised.)





full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
Let me know how that Freq goes. Mine never averaged over 440 at 231.25.
225 was actually higher GH/s for me. Yeah.. it was strange. No HW errors, but 225 ended up being better. I may try it again.


here is a little reminder for us     well  for me.

vi /etc/config/asic-freq

cause I got a new one to try!!


I got a working freq!!!!  


231.25     just started testing it

lets hope it works for some:




legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'

here is a little reminder for us     well  for me.

vi /etc/config/asic-freq

cause I got a new one to try!!


I got a working freq!!!! 


231.25     just started testing it

lets hope it works for some:



full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
16Q3R8NAfK63DvkTUGgLdPScyMU8uSAJUH
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

lol 50 ph in variance Smiley


Just to make it clear for you how many times has the network gone to say 50k from 100k. If you think the actual hashrate is varying? ( yes it will vary if someone brings new equipment online or takes it off, or chips vary slightly. )  That isn't luck lol.

You are not going to see for example your home hardware spiking from 440 ( on an s3 ) to 660 and to 220 for any length of time, much less everyone's at once.

Made me smile though.

Edit-

I am very curious though who/what/where it was.  Will probably find out soon if it wasn't any of the major equipment vendors testing.   Would be interesting to see it stay up for a while then we start to get a slew of complaints x vendor just shipped me dusty used equipment.  Then again it could be some cloud mining operation setting up in Iceland finally and getting it right.

Bitfury datacenter (google it)
hero member
Activity: 494
Merit: 500
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

lol 50 ph in variance Smiley


Just to make it clear for you how many times has the network gone to say 50k from 100k. If you think the actual hashrate is varying? ( yes it will vary if someone brings new equipment online or takes it off, or chips vary slightly. )  That isn't luck lol.

You are not going to see for example your home hardware spiking from 440 ( on an s3 ) to 660 and to 220 for any length of time, much less everyone's at once.

Made me smile though.

Edit-

I am very curious though who/what/where it was.  Will probably find out soon if it wasn't any of the major equipment vendors testing.   Would be interesting to see it stay up for a while then we start to get a slew of complaints x vendor just shipped me dusty used equipment.  Then again it could be some cloud mining operation setting up in Iceland finally and getting it right.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The 504 block rate on wisdom is too large.  At least the coinwarz one gives a relative speed understand.

I'll tell the cop next time i'm speed well officer I have average 60mph but if oyu say I was doing 120 then I think it was variance.

Too large for what? What "relative speed"? Difficulty adjustment is based on the last 2016 blocks. Not 504 and not whatever CoinWarz is using. Smaller sample == more variance.

Comparing distance-over-time calculation to the inherently random process of mining is like apples to androids.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

Not to mention that looking at that CoinWarz chart is unhealthy. It seems to be using a small number of blocks to "measure" the hashrate and creates a bunch of meaningless spikes. What matters is the whole 2016 blocks, not what happens in between.

The 504 block rate on wisdom is too large.  At least the coinwarz one gives a relative speed understand.

I'll tell the cop next time i'm speed well officer I have average 60mph but if oyu say I was doing 120 then I think it was variance.

and I really doubt that variance would account for 50 phash.  I agree others with smaller miners go elsewhere but as long as they are on a pool doin the same thing they were and there was no difficulty change then they should mine the same amount with and without the 50 phash being on the network.  The largest difference that I can see if the difficulty rate will jump sooner.

Just my understanding of it.

Fahlcor

A period of bad luck, followed by good luck and then back to bad luck can certainly explain the spike on that chart. Just look at the past on that very same chart... it's one spike followed by a dip, one after the other.

I don't disagree that there are dozens of PH being added at this very moment. I just don't believe for one second that someone is switching tons of mining gear off-and-on for no logical reason. The truth lies somewhere between 0 and 50PHs.
full member
Activity: 139
Merit: 100
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

Not to mention that looking at that CoinWarz chart is unhealthy. It seems to be using a small number of blocks to "measure" the hashrate and creates a bunch of meaningless spikes. What matters is the whole 2016 blocks, not what happens in between.

The 504 block rate on wisdom is too large.  At least the coinwarz one gives a relative speed understand.

I'll tell the cop next time i'm speed well officer I have average 60mph but if oyu say I was doing 120 then I think it was variance.

and I really doubt that variance would account for 50 phash.  I agree others with smaller miners go elsewhere but as long as they are on a pool doin the same thing they were and there was no difficulty change then they should mine the same amount with and without the 50 phash being on the network.  The largest difference that I can see if the difficulty rate will jump sooner.

Just my understanding of it.

Fahlcor
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

my guess is both variance and the bitfury came online    which means 169 is too low and 209 is too high.  maybe we are at  185ph .  would prefer the  rate to jump 15% or less have to wait a while to see whats really up.  well my 2 s-3s come soon. will wait for them

Why do you all panic? With the last 25% jump everybody was crying "it will go on like this forever" and the following increase was the smallest since long time with 2 more very low to follow. Even with a big next increase we are still lower than expected a few weeks ago.
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

my guess is both variance and the bitfury came online    which means 169 is too low and 209 is too high.  maybe we are at  185ph .  would prefer the  rate to jump 15% or less have to wait a while to see whats really up.  well my 2 s-3s come soon. will wait for them
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

Not to mention that looking at that CoinWarz chart is unhealthy. It seems to be using a small number of blocks to "measure" the hashrate and creates a bunch of meaningless spikes. What matters is the whole 2016 blocks, not what happens in between.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

Speculation on some other boards is that it is BitFury bringing it's hardware on-line / offline  in it's newest data center it just built.

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2014/08/01/bitfury-asic-maker-builds-20mw-bitcoin-mining-data-center/
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1077
^ Will code for Bitcoins
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.

When you see small drop in a hashrate after the large network hashrate rise it's easy to explain: a lot of people turning off their older generations of miners, because they don't mine even for electricity with new hashrate. Some turn them off permanently, some point the miners from bitcoin to other coins, what else they can do? Can't let them burn electricity for negative profit.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
Anyone want to speculate which hardware manufacturer was testing harder to the tune of 50 phash for a day or so to give us such a pretty spike in difficulty?

Hopefully it stays gone....

http://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chart

Dive difficulty Dive!!

Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.   Roll Eyes

"Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in."

If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment.
sr. member
Activity: 362
Merit: 250
BITMAIN,

Is there a difference between July 28th and July 21st firmware? Can you upload please?
grn
sr. member
Activity: 357
Merit: 252
SP30 aug batch  4.5t x 1000
Jump to: