Pages:
Author

Topic: Antminer V9 4TH - page 8. (Read 19995 times)

legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
February 08, 2018, 08:08:24 AM
#86
I can run a 900W S7 with a single fan at 30% and it's a heck of a lot quieter than a stock S7.
member
Activity: 223
Merit: 12
February 08, 2018, 02:37:17 AM
#85
Perhaps another (two) way(s) to look at this particular product... (at least this is how I am looking at it)...

I have been running some of Sidehack's 2Pac sticks on a small rig, and mining directly to a paper wallet that I'm stashing away for the BTC $500k days they say are coming. Or whatever. Rainy day wallet. The sticks have been religiously cranking away at 260-300 GH/s and its been an interesting learning curve and fun way to soak up some stuff. However, I wanted to do something a bit more effective towards my paper wallet mining, and had been considering a used Antminer S4 on eBay. At 2 TH (and 1300 watts) I've been debating the plusses and minuses of doing this. The units are cheap, and the "ROI" or profitability of the coins aren't as much a consideration for me as just slowly, quietly stacking some coin in the corner.

S4's have been averaging $275 - $350 on eBay. I'd have preferred an S7 for the additional hash rate and better power consumption, comparably. If the real investment in my paper mining is the power cost alone... so be it... but at $1,200 or so per S7 lately on eBay, it didn't make sense. That's more than I want to invest.

So these new V9 units are attractive to me for that reason alone. $345 and 4 TH okay... now we're talking. Better efficiency than S4, better hashing power than S4... sweet. Sign me up. So that's one way to see it.

But then... a good friend of mine told me what he's been doing with one of his S9 units. He bought extra S9 control boards on eBay and has been splitting an S9 into "three" functional units. You get the benefits of S9 power efficiency, and about 4.5 TH of hashing power per board. So he can split the hashing power across three different coins if he wants. In my case, I could break out a single board on an S9 unit to be the "paper wallet" board... and let the other two do what they've been doing.

member
Activity: 140
Merit: 17
February 07, 2018, 11:29:44 PM
#84
Their miners already sell pretty well and most people probably won't even notice the new label on the miner. I don't think they've had many issues with product marketing recently considering their S9s sold out in minutes just a few weeks back.

However my point was that it is maybe not ideal to present a new product very similar to old one with such obvious image manipulation.

I agree. 100%. Here in America.

You are dealing with the Chinese now. Business customs and practices are so totally different that one can’t even begin to explain. You just have to work with them a few time and you’ll get it.

The label IS important. The label DOES make this a new item. This is how Chinese business works. If they are selling it and they are calling it new and they rebrand.  It’s new!

That’s why dealing with the Chinese and Latinos is a total PITA. They’re still developing.
Thanks for your bigotry.

Cool. Ride your high horse next time you send $100,000 wire transfer to a Chinese company who suddenly changes the terms of your agreement as soon as payment is received and let me know how it plays out for you.
Being scammed by a Chinese company doesn't give you the right of insulting all Chinese (and latinos while you're on it). My "high horse" is not that high.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
February 07, 2018, 08:10:03 PM
#83
So just for shits and grins, I clicked on the email I received from Bitmain to order 5 V9's.  The add to cart button works, but nothing appears in your cart.   Shitmain should put more thought into the operation of their website rather than re-branding S7's.
jr. member
Activity: 126
Merit: 1
February 07, 2018, 07:29:36 PM
#82
Their miners already sell pretty well and most people probably won't even notice the new label on the miner. I don't think they've had many issues with product marketing recently considering their S9s sold out in minutes just a few weeks back.

However my point was that it is maybe not ideal to present a new product very similar to old one with such obvious image manipulation.

I agree. 100%. Here in America.

You are dealing with the Chinese now. Business customs and practices are so totally different that one can’t even begin to explain. You just have to work with them a few time and you’ll get it.

The label IS important. The label DOES make this a new item. This is how Chinese business works. If they are selling it and they are calling it new and they rebrand.  It’s new!

That’s why dealing with the Chinese and Latinos is a total PITA. They’re still developing.
Thanks for your bigotry.

Cool. Ride your high horse next time you send $100,000 wire transfer to a Chinese company who suddenly changes the terms of your agreement as soon as payment is received and let me know how it plays out for you.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
February 07, 2018, 07:23:56 PM
#81
Just got the email from Bitmain this morning. 4 th/s @1000 watts? Lol is this 2015 with 28nm? I would have preferred an undervolted S9 or R4 to an undervolted S7.

Well I sharpened up the pencil a bit and this is the results. Factoring last two years difficulty increase and how much they are asking/projecting clients get in return compared to network difficulty increase.

Update: link to document
 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11QS1BBV11KNGTF8N_-fdfmjTZ3WzPQFbLfVrl5n6R8s/edit?usp=sharing

BTC/USD 8,500 USD at a conservative difficulty increase of 10% until march and 2% after.

https://i.imgur.com/Hf8xftO.png

BTC/USD 15,000 USD at a conservative difficulty increase of 10% until march and 2% after.

https://i.imgur.com/rzLkzIe.png

UPDATED: New Difficulty Info
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 17
February 07, 2018, 06:53:30 PM
#80
Their miners already sell pretty well and most people probably won't even notice the new label on the miner. I don't think they've had many issues with product marketing recently considering their S9s sold out in minutes just a few weeks back.

However my point was that it is maybe not ideal to present a new product very similar to old one with such obvious image manipulation.

I agree. 100%. Here in America.

You are dealing with the Chinese now. Business customs and practices are so totally different that one can’t even begin to explain. You just have to work with them a few time and you’ll get it.

The label IS important. The label DOES make this a new item. This is how Chinese business works. If they are selling it and they are calling it new and they rebrand.  It’s new!

That’s why dealing with the Chinese and Latinos is a total PITA. They’re still developing.
Thanks for your bigotry.
jr. member
Activity: 126
Merit: 1
February 07, 2018, 06:33:29 PM
#79
Their miners already sell pretty well and most people probably won't even notice the new label on the miner. I don't think they've had many issues with product marketing recently considering their S9s sold out in minutes just a few weeks back.

However my point was that it is maybe not ideal to present a new product very similar to old one with such obvious image manipulation.

I agree. 100%. Here in America.

You are dealing with the Chinese now. Business customs and practices are so totally different that one can’t even begin to explain. You just have to work with them a few time and you’ll get it.

The label IS important. The label DOES make this a new item. This is how Chinese business works. If they are selling it and they are calling it new and they rebrand.  It’s new!

That’s why dealing with the Chinese and Latinos is a total PITA. They’re still developing.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
February 07, 2018, 06:21:37 PM
#78
Their miners already sell pretty well and most people probably won't even notice the new label on the miner. I don't think they've had many issues with product marketing recently considering their S9s sold out in minutes just a few weeks back.

Absolutely, their sales record has been excellent in a market with enormous demand for past few months.

However my point was that it is maybe not ideal to present a new product very similar to old one with such obvious image manipulation.
jr. member
Activity: 126
Merit: 1
February 07, 2018, 06:08:14 PM
#77
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test
If it looks like the S7, specs sound like the S7, and it performs like the S7, then it probably is a S7.

Haha, this is usually quite accurate statement! As pointed out above already, they did not really bother to ease the concerns with their product marketing. If they wanted to convince the customer base that this is a brand new product, they probably should have hired somebody with better Photoshop skills to do the sales images Cheesy

https://imgur.com/a/9fC6D

Not stating anything about the product, but that looks just about as bad as it can.

Step 1: remove sticker to expose s7 label
Step 2: list on eBay or amazon for $999
Step 3: profit
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1130
Bitcoin FTW!
February 07, 2018, 06:01:04 PM
#76
Their miners already sell pretty well and most people probably won't even notice the new label on the miner. I don't think they've had many issues with product marketing recently considering their S9s sold out in minutes just a few weeks back.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
February 07, 2018, 05:49:57 PM
#75
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test
If it looks like the S7, specs sound like the S7, and it performs like the S7, then it probably is a S7.

Haha, this is usually quite accurate statement! As pointed out above already, they did not really bother to ease the concerns with their product marketing. If they wanted to convince the customer base that this is a brand new product, they probably should have hired somebody with better Photoshop skills to do the sales images Cheesy

https://imgur.com/a/9fC6D

Not stating anything about the product, but that looks just about as bad as it can.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1710
Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.
February 07, 2018, 05:32:57 PM
#74
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test
If it looks like the S7, specs sound like the S7, and it performs like the S7, then it probably is a S7.
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 17
February 07, 2018, 05:02:30 PM
#73
I think most of you have forgotten that Bitmain sold tens of thousands of used AntMiner S7s when they upgraded to the S9 a couple years ago. They sold the used S7s with minimum order quantities of 500 and they specifically called them out as being used with no warranty. Considering they probably sold all of their used S7s AND these have a different chip in them, I suspect the V4 is probably a 28nm version of the T9 that was easy and fast to throw into production a couple months ago when Bitcoin/Bitcoin Cash were soaring. Think about it - getting in line for more products with TSMC probably takes 3-6 months of lead time. The faster/cheaper route when attempting to catch the wave would be to use a 28nm node that aren't competing with all of the 16nm stuff.
Maybe, but the part about being a new chip doesn't make sense to me. They do have the mask already for the old S7 chips I guess? They may have just ordered more and use a new name for them. Newly produced S7s does seem to make sense overall, but if that's the case they missed the wave badly.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1710
Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.
February 07, 2018, 04:29:49 PM
#72
It sells much better than if they would sold those as S7 miners like they are.

"OOOOHHH NEW MINERRSSS!!!"   vs.    "Oh that's just a old S7, booooooo."
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
February 07, 2018, 03:44:44 PM
#71
I think most of you have forgotten that Bitmain sold tens of thousands of used AntMiner S7s when they upgraded to the S9 a couple years ago. They sold the used S7s with minimum order quantities of 500 and they specifically called them out as being used with no warranty. Considering they probably sold all of their used S7s AND these have a different chip in them, I suspect the V4 is probably a 28nm version of the T9 that was easy and fast to throw into production a couple months ago when Bitcoin/Bitcoin Cash were soaring. Think about it - getting in line for more products with TSMC probably takes 3-6 months of lead time. The faster/cheaper route when attempting to catch the wave would be to use a 28nm node that aren't competing with all of the 16nm stuff.

The T9 used the SAME chip as the S9, just fewer of them running at a higher voltage for less efficiency.
These look likely to be a relabled S7 chip.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
February 07, 2018, 03:42:17 PM
#70
Yep, 4Th at ~1000W shipping April to May for around $335 USD. I'd be interested in one of these if they brought em to the US site. Apparently 80% will be shipped April and 20% in May.

On a side note, I haven't seen a miner sell for this cheap in a very long time from Bitmain. Seems to be a simple S7 underclock and they're trying to dump their existing miners.

Link: https://shop.bitmain.com/productDetail.htm?pid=00020180205085836862oAuXwgTa0710#1353

 It's on the US site (now) - but forget about it unless you have SUPER cheap electric, at my VERY LOW electric rate it barely nets $10/month (and I'm in the 3'd LOWEST rate area of the US).
 They SHOULD have introduced it a month or two ago, it would has sold like hotcakes then.
 My bloody A2 farm is MORE profitable per $ invested than this thing is.

 STILL the insistence on that BCH garbage for payment.

 
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
February 07, 2018, 03:29:50 PM
#69
They seem to only make sense if you have less than .03 kw/h power, to see anything close to an ROI.

I would be curious to see what it really says under the white sticker that seems to have been applied over the top of the original sticker. If it weren't for the MOQ of 5, I would order one just to find out.

Considering that you may not have this hardware until sometime in march I have taken the yearly average of 10% network difficulty increase and applied it for when you are expected to start receiving the hardware.

Here is an estimate of the network difficulty as of March 2018.

Results for BTC/USD estimated trading price at $8500.00 USD
Estimated March 23 2018 Difficulty 3,811,165,475,251



Results for BTC/USD estimated trading price at $15000.00 USD
Estimated March 23 2018 Difficulty 3,811,165,475,251



Edit: Forgot to include the reference document link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11QS1BBV11KNGTF8N_-fdfmjTZ3WzPQFbLfVrl5n6R8s/edit?usp=sharing
sr. member
Activity: 384
Merit: 256
February 07, 2018, 03:18:50 PM
#68
I think most of you have forgotten that Bitmain sold tens of thousands of used AntMiner S7s when they upgraded to the S9 a couple years ago. They sold the used S7s with minimum order quantities of 500 and they specifically called them out as being used with no warranty. Considering they probably sold all of their used S7s AND these have a different chip in them, I suspect the V4 is probably a 28nm version of the T9 that was easy and fast to throw into production a couple months ago when Bitcoin/Bitcoin Cash were soaring. Think about it - getting in line for more products with TSMC probably takes 3-6 months of lead time. The faster/cheaper route when attempting to catch the wave would be to use a 28nm node that aren't competing with all of the 16nm stuff.
hero member
Activity: 571
Merit: 507
February 07, 2018, 03:07:09 PM
#67
maybe they should just sell more antminers s7-ln, I miss mine. sold it too early Sad
Pages:
Jump to: