Topic: Anunymint ban - page 6. (Read 9083 times)

I just responded to you in that other thread. 

@JayJuanGee, @infofront suggested that we move the offtopic discussion to Meta, but I see you refuse.

I have put my reply to you there in Meta. Please continue your further replies there.

You apparently don't understand what is a troll.  You should look in the mirror or look at your fuck buddy, anunymint, as examples of what is a troll. If you spent more time providing good arguments and substance, then perhaps you could get somewhere with your various arguments, instead you and your fuck buddy, anunymint, seem to get caught up on questions of status and personalities. 

Present some good ideas about bitcoin, segwit, lightning, big blocks, security or whatever is your supposed bitcoin (and on topic) questions/concerns concisely and clearly, and perhaps, we could make some substantive progress in our discussion.  I am waiting, waiting, waiting to see it.

I am not an administrator, and I don't know every single factor.  Sure each of see a bunch of bullshit from Roach, but has he actually violated the same rules as anunymint?  Do you know?  I doubt that there is a double standard, and there is adminstrative discretion regarding when lines are crossed.  Surely, there would be a desire not to ban folks, so it seems pretty fucking difficult to get banned in this forum, but anunymint and several of his alts (apparently) have reached (and breached) that level of nonsense.

Regarding, the supposed substantive importance of anunymint:  I would imagine if he was actually saying something that was so fucking substantively important, then it would either not be deleted or others would be ready, willing and able to say it.. in other words, we are likely not losing much if anything substantively by getting rid of peeps, such as anunymint, who rise to such high level of nonsense to actually get banned from a relatively permissive forum.

https://steemit.com/freedom/@anonymint/non-decentralized-forums-are-clusterfucks-of-corruption



You’re an expert troll who desires an echo chamber and intentionally obfuscates (archived here and here) that you are unwilling or unable to learn the technological details (archived here and here)


You’re jealous when your trolling isn’t effective at maintaining the echo chamber. But this isn’t about putting anyone on a pedastal. It's about removing the groupthink and old boys’ clubs that plunge society into clusterfucked totalitarianism.


Not really. It was @mprep and his automated scripts that caused this diversion.

Somebody is awake. Kudos.


Of course we will not know who was not wearing underwear until the tide rolls out. So all of us can claim he was full of shit, but the confirmation of who is wrong comes in the future.


True. And good point. But let’s wait to see if the reality some 4 or 6 years from now is not exactly as bad as Shelby has predicted. We can only judge in hindsight not in foresight.

Its a pity that one person can make a decision to simply ban and wipe out a persons posts and hours of time and effort to narrate them all in one go.Even if someone disagrees with someones opinion they shouldnt have the right to be able to simply push a button and get rid of them.They should come on the thread and argue their opposing point.

Protecting the status quo or narrative through this form of censorship is no better than how the mainstream media overlook the opposing elements or use selective truth to suit their own narrative.

His posts had passionate arguments and a lot of indepth insight indicating he was extremely knowledgeable on these matters and people enjoyed reading them even if they didnt agree with some of the points made.

and yet roach can post his crap all over the place and not get banned??? yet shelby gets banned?? at least shelby is trying to help people preserve their wealth.

forum is full of double standards.

That's bullshit.

A warrior can learn how to present ideas clearly consisely, persuasively and even forcefully rather than employing various emotional outbursts, irrelevancies and personal attacks.  Bitcoin is powerful as fuck and powerful as fuck as a disrupter of traditional systems. If you are unwilling or unable to present your ideas amongst the disrupters (meaning core developers and those kind of technical folks), then what the fuck you doing spending a whole hell of a lot of time appealing to the masses with disjointed rants....

Anyhow, if his ideas were so meaningful and great, then perhaps even a BIP or two might be productive to bring attention to those supposed important various matters and to attempt to work with out great minds within core in weeding out the good, bad and the ugly of his ideas.  

Otherwise if he is engaged in an ongoing battle against core, then it merely appears that he is attacking bitcoin rather than attempting to be persuasively and warriorly constructive (and on the right side of the disrupters).

Seems like bullshit to put banned folks like this on a pedestal, and then to proclaim that somehow they have great, wonderful, yet censored ideas, when even while he (anunymint) was posting, he was having difficulties making his ideas clear and even staying on topic, rather than devolving into continued and ongoing ad hominen lambasts.

Wouldn't you? Personally, I don't take people that serious who think mining nodes are jokes and everything is about Blockchain.info wallets.
@anunymint, Shelby is a polemic, a warrior. He goes beyond polemics by too much exaggerations and insistings on lost fronts but it is not his fault, it is ours and our prominent figures in bitcoin who have betrayed the cause, the resistance axiom, who have compromised bitcoin.

A warrior is out of options in this situation, he has to over magnify the truth, to make it distinguished from the lies and to bring it out from the shades and shadows.

As of non-mining nodes issue, it is not about underestimating them, it is about the importance of mining nodes which is being denied, intentionally and hypocritically by people who are in charge here to hide the insane situation with Bitmain with an anti-Bitmain gesture... disgusting.

I'm against banning people in such cases at least but what happened is far beyond banning, It was a slaughter.
A considerable amount of posts, including his and our posts that have quoted him has been removed.
It seems to me like our supreme leader is too busy, so he just issues an assessenation command and his bot agents remove the user and his posts and all the posts that has quoted his posts ... again, disgusting.

You would? Personally, I would not take someone that seriously if he believes that non-mining nodes are not needed for the network, and that only mining nodes matter. I would be very cynical to be frank.

But he was good to have a around for discussion's sake.


Hi anonymint. The forum oligarchy banned you.

The point is he shouldn't be stopped. Unless the guy committed some serious crime why is he being censored here? My guess is his criticisms of some members here made enemies. Honestly the guy can be obnoxious at times and arrogant but he clearly knows enough to demand as much respect as a Satoshi or a Vitalik IMO. Very sad some mods here are being hard asses about the rules here when this forum has become a ridiculous mess of sock puppets that are allowed to make multiple accounts and often scam people. Whatever anyone think about Shelby he has gone public and doesn't hide behind sock puppets, he is just trying to discuss higher level shit with the right people.


I personally want the Mods to explain fully why he is permanently banned here and him being rude or an asshole simply won't cut it. He should be allowed to post under this real name or this forum for me lost the last drop of credibility it has left. I'm not asking for Shelby and I'm not asking for the mods I'm asking cause I want to read his discussions I doubt he gives a shit. But why push a valued crypto developer into running around with socks like a damn criminal.


*I just noticed im actually being deleted. Wow. This forum really has turned to shit.

I would have taken him more seriously if I knew. Maybe even read some of those huge essays on the wall observer. I always liked that guy back in the early days.

Let's be real though. Hes probably right here right now. Probably reading this. If deleting accounts didn't stop him before it probably won't stop him this time.

He confirms that to me via Crypto.cat, so yes.

You are telling me anunymint was the real anonymint?