If we have trouble doing research to find good bounty campaigns, we can choose bounty campaigns based on bounty managers. Because if
the bounty managers have a good reputation, usually they will choose good projects too. Although it does not guarantee 100% success,
at least the percentage of success is higher than us following bounty campaigns that use bounty managers without a good reputation.
Though I'm done with these bounty campaigns anymore I also believe that if you have trouble looking at good campaigns then why not look at those campaigns handled by reputable managers. And that is what I am exactly doing before. I choose to participate in their handled campaign simply because I believed that they will choose a good campaign as much as possible or will avoid choosing the worst ones, to put simply they filtering it out. They will not waste their worked-hard credibility just for a scam or non-successful campaign. However, not all the time it will be successful and even them became a victim as well. Besides, it is way less risky compared to participating in random bounty campaigns.
It is true that bounty managers who have a good reputation are unlikely to choose bad bounty campaigns, because they want to raise their reputation
for the better, in order to gain the trust of project owners and bounty hunters. It can be seen that the more green trusts owned by the bounty managers,
therefore the possibility of the bounty campaigns he led also usually had good potential as well. I have been in bounty campaigns since 2017 until now,
and always satisfied with the bounty campaign led by bounty managers with good reputation.
