Any managers lost good posters due recent mass ban? - page 3.

bitbollo

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 3537

Nec Recisa Recedit

With some exceptions, I am pretty sure that a plagiarists are not useful for the forum.
And they can't considered good posters. I can't see any valid reason to maintain these users.
I don't want read the same content two times Cheesy

Look this as e.g.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.38711853

Quote from: bitbollo on April 22, 2018, 04:44:27 AM

yes yobit set an high price for promising coin/token. this is explained then by a medium price higher then other exchange for same pair.for coins with a low interest they add very low commission (or you can't withdraw at all!). sometimes is a serious issue because you're a forced to sell your coins to a fake price.
exchange tron in waves (little fee) or doge and withdraw directly to another exchange and buy tron.
you loss a small percentage of your wealth but you save 300 trx fee.

Quote from: mirror001 on May 20, 2018, 03:05:42 PM

indeed yobit set a high cost for promising coin/token. this is clarified then by a medium cost higher then other trade for same pair.for coins with a low intrigue they include low commission (or you can't pull back by any stretch of the imagination!). some of the time is a significant issue since you're a compelled to pitch your coins to a phony cost.
trade tron in waves (little charge) or doge and pull back straightforwardly to another trade and purchase tron.
you misfortune a little level of your riches yet you spare 300 trx expense.

btcsmlcmnr

full member

Activity: 546

Merit: 159

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on May 16, 2019, 07:19:07 PM

The recent purge was brutal, but it was appropriate and sends a very strong message that plagiarism is not tolerated here.

Agreed.

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on May 16, 2019, 07:19:07 PM

Yeah, I'm not sure about that. Plus from a campaign's point of view, they get less advertising space with a lower-ranked account--that's obviously why they pay Heros and Legendaries a higher rate.

ChipMixer campaign even has not opened up a single new slot with ban of cellard. If campaigns expand original ranks from Legendary to Senior member ranks (for example) to lower ranks, like Full member or even Member ranks, there might occur another new trend.
Character assasination aims at higher ranks to dig deeply in the past in order to find their mistakes and report them. Everyone can make mistakes when we are newbies, so if they dig deeply, they might find some. To be honest with you all, I don't think it should be a trend at any odds.

Quote from: DarkStar_ on May 15, 2019, 04:51:59 PM

For everyone hoping to get cellard's spot: There will not be a new slot opened up as a result of his ban.

By the way, I would like to ask this, so please give me answer if you know it.

Quote from: btcsmlcmnr on May 17, 2019, 03:19:56 AM

It raise the ideas that why old users here don't spend their time to check their past posts. I meant I am sure that there are dominant part of forum users did not read forum rules in their trust days there, and of course they did something wrong that they did not even know that they violated forum rules and might get troubles by doing this. So, why not check past posts and delete what you think are shitposts, or not sure why and how you made that post; I believe no one can remember their past posts are palgiarisms or not (that partially why we see ban appeals ask for evidence), so it's better to delete if you think it is poor quality posts.

Only one question, which kind of treatments if one user delete their past posts that are palgiarism, before get reported (it means users realized their mistakes themselves, and correct their mistakes)?
1] Will it actually be considered as plagiarism with same treatments, perma-bans?
2] Will they be fine if they delete their past plagiarism before getting reported?
I think the answer is the second one.

LogitechMouse

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1043

Need A Campaign Manager? | Contact Little_Mouse

In your perspective as a campaign manager, it is hard for you since you really lost a good posters in your campaign but in the perspective of the admins and moderators, they don't care even you are a good poster or not as long as you break the rules they will do what they must do and that is to ban you.

Bitcointalk is not a place for employees as others said. This is a place to learn. There are many hero and legendary users here who didn't do any bad things here such as copy pasting and plagiarize. Why don't you hire them? Its better to hire user who don't break the rules compare to those who does.

Foxpup

legendary

Activity: 4522

Merit: 3183

Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023

Quote from: SuperPandaBear on May 16, 2019, 03:06:49 PM

It feels like the state is telling me who I can hire or not.

The state isn't telling you anything of the sort; it's just jailing your employees for committing crimes. You can technically still employ criminals if you want, as long as you don't mind them not showing up for work on account of being stuck in jail.

josephdd1

hero member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 513

Quote from: SuperPandaBear on May 16, 2019, 03:06:49 PM

I have lost good Hero and Legendary posters on my list because they copypasted something years ago and it seems they cannot join again for a year. Now im having a hard time picking up experienced posters. Most Legendaries aren't even that active anymore since they are probably rich from bitcoin. They are the ones that have been here through all the hard forks and know how things work. This has been a mistake. If it happened more than 1 or 2 years ago and it wasn't much I wouldn't kick them out of the campaign if they were doing a good job. It should be the managers doing the casting and evaluating case by case. It feels like the state is telling me who I can hire or not.

The one problem this merit system has sprawled up is this distinction between heroes and legendaries. when first campaigns were categorizing according to rank, remember there was no distinction between a hero and legendary. Simply because their signature spaces do not differ from each other in terms of the benefit they give.

So all this bullshit about segragating hero pay vs legendary pay is a ploy by campaign managers and campaign runners (projects) to pay less for the same service. Anyone arguing that a legendary brings more prestige or reputation to the post, then they can stop right there and kiss my ass.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: SuperPandaBear on May 16, 2019, 03:06:49 PM

It feels like the state is telling me who I can hire or not.

You can't hire people who break forum rules. That's hardly over-restrictive.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: khaled0111 on May 16, 2019, 03:31:56 PM

just give a chance to lower ranked membres and you will be amazed by the quality of their posts.

Yeah, I'm not sure about that. Plus from a campaign's point of view, they get less advertising space with a lower-ranked account--that's obviously why they pay Heros and Legendaries a higher rate.

The recent purge was brutal, but it was appropriate and sends a very strong message that plagiarism is not tolerated here. Obviously a lot of members don't seem to understand that fact, but they probably will now. And as far as campaigns not having enough good posters as a result of the bans....who cares? Bitcointalk isn't an employment agency, and the opportunity to be able to earn money from posting is a privilege, and one that gets taken for granted and abused to no end. It's not Theymos's problem if a bunch of members suddenly got booted from their campaigns.

khaled0111

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 3045

Top Crypto Casino

By taking a look at all those ban appeal threads, it is obvious that many good membres got banned.
I am sure you can find other good posters, just give a chance to lower ranked membres and you will be amazed by the quality of their posts.

jackg

copper member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 3071

https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory

The thing is there were a lot of bounty managers not doing this. It does seem like it might be helpful if a given deadline was added for bans such as this. There are a lot of legendary members that have been suggest to be given much more lenient "sentensing" than the perma ban. But the point still stands if an offence was committed in 2014, they clearly got away with it...

I get that not everyone had the embarrisment of plagiarising that wikipedia page that you couldn't be bothered writing for history so the teacher made you read the first five pages of the 500 page novel you brought in on the lusitania...

SuperPandaBear

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 8

I have lost good Hero and Legendary posters on my list because they copypasted something years ago and it seems they cannot join again for a year. Now im having a hard time picking up experienced posters. Most Legendaries aren't even that active anymore since they are probably rich from bitcoin. They are the ones that have been here through all the hard forks and know how things work. This has been a mistake. If it happened more than 1 or 2 years ago and it wasn't much I wouldn't kick them out of the campaign if they were doing a good job. It should be the managers doing the casting and evaluating case by case. It feels like the state is telling me who I can hire or not.

Topic: Any managers lost good posters due recent mass ban? - page 3. (Read 1254 times)