Topic: anyone read this article: The scam called Bitcoin? (Read 4587 times)
yes the developers till the moment made an amazing work and till the moment no one cant complaint some invested too many on the hope it break stars in worth like gold did in 30 years... it can happen but will be on slow time not in two years or less .
Once new innovation comes out, ppl can like or dislike it and have their own valid reasons. Never mind time will tell everything.
How, you would be calling the naysayers are having the valid reason, they do not have such high value to validate the Bitcoin which made the real revolution in this digital world, there are lot of people who gave the hard effort at day and night times to give innovative things to the people around the world.
well people shot everyplace trying to make head shot on the brain of peoples ,saying bitcoin isnt what it is really a coin and a payment processor powerful that ask a low fee between who sell and who buy.
If this is ponzi it'd be the longest and most earned ponzi ever
well they talk about a thing they didnt looked depply even if they had looked it otherwise wouldnt make sense to write such about a thing that almost dont know or searched about
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlJku_CSyNg
It's proved if bitcoin is famous, awesome and a lot fans out there, when you have a fans always there are a haters.
~iki
~iki
well they talk about a thing they didnt looked depply even if they had looked it otherwise wouldnt make sense to write such about a thing that almost dont know or searched about
This article points out lots of negative in bitcoins. I really don't like this article. The title itself already tell it's content. Bitcoin isn't just a scam. I'm sure after many years the author will knee and ask himself "Why did I write this?" Bitcoin gives hope for others.
At first they say that everything is bad and a scam.
First light = bad, first car = bad, internet = bad
in 5 years Matt O'Brien will change his opinion, and he will cry later, to not jump on this revolution.
First light = bad, first car = bad, internet = bad
in 5 years Matt O'Brien will change his opinion, and he will cry later, to not jump on this revolution.
Very good point. It's either "scam" or "toy." Either "too good to be true" or "why would anyone in Realville use this?" Same old song...
Negative media doesn't matter nearly as much as the occasional positive stories about BTC:
The Flat Earth Society will reject Bitcoin, but a large group of wise investors will seek refuge from the tyranny of fiat money.
At first they say that everything is bad and a scam.
First light = bad, first car = bad, internet = bad
in 5 years Matt O'Brien will change his opinion, and he will cry later, to not jump on this revolution.
First light = bad, first car = bad, internet = bad
in 5 years Matt O'Brien will change his opinion, and he will cry later, to not jump on this revolution.
gandhi quote would come in hand here, it is what they are exactly doing
bitcoin will win in the end, no matter how much they hate it or they want it to not succeed
we are in the mid of 2015 now. i will not read that. a waste of time.
At first they say that everything is bad and a scam.
First light = bad, first car = bad, internet = bad
in 5 years Matt O'Brien will change his opinion, and he will cry later, to not jump on this revolution.
First light = bad, first car = bad, internet = bad
in 5 years Matt O'Brien will change his opinion, and he will cry later, to not jump on this revolution.
Very good point. It's either "scam" or "toy." Either "too good to be true" or "why would anyone in Realville use this?" Same old song...
At first they say that everything is bad and a scam.
First light = bad, first car = bad, internet = bad
in 5 years Matt O'Brien will change his opinion, and he will cry later, to not jump on this revolution.
First light = bad, first car = bad, internet = bad
in 5 years Matt O'Brien will change his opinion, and he will cry later, to not jump on this revolution.
This. There's also a ton of FUD in the general public about bitcoin in general. The media does a fantastic job portraying it as "illegal ponzi currency"
well media works with money if you pay them to say someone made a shop of bitcoin,someone sold or bought a ferrari with bitcoin they would make it happen .... remember they got paid to do some articles...
"anyone read this article: The scam called Bitcoin?"
No, but I did read a blog post some time ago that might as well have been entitled "The scam called Nxt." Had the author of it not self-disclosed his identity, I would have been tempted to comment: "Is that you, Mr. Schiff?"
But I do have to say that reading that particular dithyramb did reinforce the point that we're all in this together. With that noted, I'll head back to the altcoin ghetto.
No, but I did read a blog post some time ago that might as well have been entitled "The scam called Nxt." Had the author of it not self-disclosed his identity, I would have been tempted to comment: "Is that you, Mr. Schiff?"
But I do have to say that reading that particular dithyramb did reinforce the point that we're all in this together. With that noted, I'll head back to the altcoin ghetto.
Sounds like a clickbait article for ad money. Everyone's paying attention to bitcoin now, so it's not surprising.
Sometimes it's hard to tell whether Bitcoin is more like Ponzi scheme or a pyramid scheme.
Whatever it is, though, it isn't a currency. It's a tech stock. Each Bitcoin is really a share in a system that seems to make it cheaper to transfer things online - money, stocks, bonds, even the deed to your house - by cutting out the middleman. Well, kind of. Bitcoin doesn't remove the middleman so much as replace him with middlemen who don't make you pay much, but make society as a whole do so instead. Is this progress?
[...]
And the final conclusion is "The future might not belong to Bitcoin, but it should to its technology."
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11462977
Whatever it is, though, it isn't a currency. It's a tech stock. Each Bitcoin is really a share in a system that seems to make it cheaper to transfer things online - money, stocks, bonds, even the deed to your house - by cutting out the middleman. Well, kind of. Bitcoin doesn't remove the middleman so much as replace him with middlemen who don't make you pay much, but make society as a whole do so instead. Is this progress?
[...]
And the final conclusion is "The future might not belong to Bitcoin, but it should to its technology."
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11462977
Finally a post I agree too, not entirely, but partly. I've huge respect and appreciation for Block chain, and not bitcoin in itself. I'm a staunch support of Etherium too, love the idea. Block chain is the future in my opinion, and from where I see it, it's bright and shiny.
It's cool because he shows he has no idea about this and it's cool to see ignorant people talking about things they don't know
the thing is to keep bitcoin alive on news even with bad or good news to it the thing is to show to the world that bitcoin keeps here and can wait for them as internet made on the last years ....
Jump to: