That is a very optimistic scenario. Especially when you take into consideration the fact that the pool has covered only 0.044592% of the entire range. In reality if you have fast GPU(s) you could join the pool and mine with us for the weeks/months that it is going to take and then when it is found you would be getting a very sizable chunk of the $6000 pie. If you don't have fast gpus then you have no place to complain because you aren't going to find it alone either making your slice of the pie zero.
The chances of finding it immediately after joining is extremely low at this point. It is possible but unlikely.
The pool is still in the beginning and now like anything just getting started is the best time to get on board to secure your slice of the pie.
I like to think I did not create the pool to get a bigger slice of the pie. I did it to cook the pie faster. That being said my slice gets smaller with every new range submitted by another user.
Give it a try and you will see that.
The chances of finding it immediately after joining is extremely low at this point. It is possible but unlikely.
The pool is still in the beginning and now like anything just getting started is the best time to get on board to secure your slice of the pie.
I like to think I did not create the pool to get a bigger slice of the pie. I did it to cook the pie faster. That being said my slice gets smaller with every new range submitted by another user.
Give it a try and you will see that.
Ok. But explain to me why, when I start your client I have 2 targets, respectively two BTC addresses, at each scanned range. One is for #64 but the other for what? For your database?
Be fair, man!
I'll tell you what you do with the database created with the help of the contributors. You will have access to those addresses and if ever they are used you will steal from those wallets everything. This is the truth, no matter what you say and how many bullshit say about your pool.
