The point of insurance is to ensure that Coinabul does not have any losses in the case where they need to re-send or refund an order. This has nothing to do with your customer except that he specifically asked for and payed extra for insurance. If my insurance company denied my claim for car repair after I already got it fixed, it isn't like I can tell the repair shop, "sorry, claim denied, I refuse to pay".
Coinabul is absolutely responsible, their insurance was inadequate or, at best, misrepresented for their packages and asking the customer to accept full responsibility for this is shocking.
That seems to be what happened. I'm just waiting for this to be moved to the scammers sub-forum.
This isn't a scam, it's just poor customer service. Coinabul is within their rights to deny responsibility for the loss unless someone can show evidence that this is a direct result of Coinabul's actions or covered under their terms and conditions.
If the buyer paid for insured shipping and it was not insured is that not a scam? They admitted they failed to insure it correctly.
I'm sorry, are you claiming that is was not insured or that it was insured incorrectly? I don't see Coinabul admitting either, in any case.
It was insured. I paid a premium for insured shipping.
Coinabul claim they have changed their insurance arrangements so this won't happen again. This strongly suggests they were uninsured or underinsured. That I should eat the result of that is what is question.