Topic: Are hashlets worth it? - page 2. (Read 10114 times)

Not to my knowledge.

Outside from the advertisement, and shameless advertising which I assume everyone does.

Have they ever missed a payout?

Don't you worry they have even more revievs and if companies didn't pay for advertising and SEO such offers would cease to exist.
I find it difficult to understand why some of you see advertising as a bad thing.

I recommend to further do your own research on GAW or better research Josh Garza and come up with your own conclusion. No point to-ing and fro-ing on the conversation as its not going anywhere.
Those images/links are payed advertisements scroll down to the bottom of the page and check pricing.

So how much was it really (no bullshitting)? 50%? 30%? Because there had to be much less since we got to the point that 99% was a lie.
All you're doing is telling lies you can't prove and calling them exaggerations. The strangest thing about this whole thing is that you're putting so much effort into making up these stories and "exaggerating" them.

Pathetic!

+1
Sooner or later, enough information that is already in the public domain will be presented to those who currently fail to comprehend what is happening and something will finally "click" in their heads.

Other than that, my suggestion is BUYER BEWARE.

Scott-

That's normally how exaggerations work.

You didn't actually think I found 100 articles about GAW and only 1 was not written/paid for by GAW did you?


How convenient of you to remove the "just about" from the beginning of that quote.


How can you tell me to be responsible with my words when you're willing to chop up the quote to change the meaning?

In my experience, just about every article I've seen about GAW has stemmed from prweb. (or been supplied info exclusively from GAW)

You can argue about semantics all you want (although I won't), it won't hide the fact that GAW is willing to pay to have positive articles published about themselves.

The problem is most of the links were unrelated.

99% an exaggeration? A rather large one don't you think? Since you can't prove even half of them are.
You said a complete bullshit that you can't prove and you know it, so the best way is to call me "incapable to understand."  

And you even supported it with another bullshit: "every major press released is written by GAW".

Time to start being responsible for your words.
Got proof or is it another "exaggeration" (lie).

Are you really going to suggest this guy has no incentive to write about GAW? They look pretty intimate to me.



Anyways my point is that GAW uses prweb period, so they are certainly willing to pay people to write/publish positive articles about themselves.


(Disclaimer: conspiracy theory)

The way I see it is that they decreased the payout of zenpool only so that it made sense for everyone to switch over to mining hashpoints.

If you were trying to make money by any means/scheme possible would you rather payout in btc (which costs you money), or payout in hashpoints (which you can print an unlimited amount of for free)?


How else could you explain those people exchanging emails for months, wondering when GAW would finish their project only to find out 6 months later that GAW hasn't even obtained the permits to begin the project?


I'm not talking about BTC.com. Buying that for $1m is within the realm of possibility because it is a premium domain and the sale itself is an advertisement.

However buying a pool nobody uses for $8 million is just absurd. I'd love to know what makes a litecoin pool worth that much.

I'm sure it has to do with whatever makes them magically payout more than you would get converting mined ltc to btc.


300 x 40 mh/s = 12 GH/s. GAW's hashrate is claimed to be somewhere between 500-1000 GH/s. How you can hide that much hashrate on the litecoin network is beyond me.

Do you understand now why I and many others demand proof of mining via a mining address instead of pics?

Here's why I'm led to believe GAW is claiming to have at least 1000 GH/s: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9516019

Sorry, I assumed you were capable of using your brain to determine which links were completely unrelated to the GAW we are talking about, but I guess I was wrong.

If you don't understand context and exaggeration, I'm not sure there's any point discussing further with you.

The point which you're obviously ignoring is that just about every major press released is written by GAW, supplied with info by GAW, and paid to have spammed across the internet by GAW.

It's a huge red flag but I'm sure that means absolutely nothing to you.

You are already being called out on this, so I won't add to the mix
Just note that there are several other big sites with their reviews, like cryptocoinsnews.com, but they must be accepting bribes too
Conspiracy theories FTW!


+1

Nobody can offer maintenance free cloud mining permanently. That's a clear sign of a ponzi. Do you think a proper company is going to pay those costs for you?

Hashlet is no longer worth it. There are far better, cheaper and maintenance free cloud mining.

You showed a google search link with ~60 links. 10 of them are about GAW Miners, the rest about some other unrelated things with the word GAW.
Point?  

You said 99% of articles about GAW miners were paid ones.

Proof?  

Whether GAW is a ponzi or not, they're still significantly more expensive than AMHash.

Maybe you aren't seeing the same page as me. Here's what I see:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08/prweb12100331.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/09/prweb12169131.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08/prweb12121662.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08/prweb12072040.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/09/prweb12154405.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08/prweb12089096.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/04/prweb11775300.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/10/prweb12220305.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/09/prweb12135161.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/04/prweb11719363.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/04/prweb11729041.htm

Still no proof!

Did you even check what the links are about?

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/10/prweb9978026.htm
Also on the speaker panel are Mr. Kenneth Gaw, GAW Capital’s President & Managing Principal with a session on ‘Repositioning and Refurbishment Projects in

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/6/prweb8506218.htm
"Jesus Christ is Margaret Gaw in her new nonfiction guide"

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/07/prweb2634024.htm
Goodwin Gaw, Founder and Managing Principal, Gaw Capital. Under Mr. Gaw's leadership, Hong Kong-based Gaw Capital has become a leading real estate investment company

A pathetic attempt

https://www.google.com/search?q=gaw&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb#rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=sb&q=gaw+site:prweb.com

Proof or didn't happen.

So what your saying is that you prefer the group of "journalists" who are paid to write positive articles about any shady/scammy company, over the group of journalists who don't accept bribes and have integrity?

Coindesk is a joke. To call it a journal is a stretch, it's more like a massive collection of paid advertisements. (PS: 99% of GAW's articles are paid for)


More sarcasm please.
The payouts dropped without his intervention so its not needed for them to go back to that point again.