I can't understand why, even though there's confirmed proof FROM THE SUPPLIER, this guy still goes on about how there is no hashing power and it's a big ponzi.
I think you perfectly understand why a new purchase of 5 PH/s doesn't prove they have been mining up to this point.
Seems like quite a waste of time/effort to have Bitmain confirm when all they need to do is post their mining address.
Oh, because they're innovating and creating a market for hashlet skin collectors to get rare hashlet skins?
Yes they have created value by painting a rock different colors. Good on them, but I wouldn't call it "innovation" as much a gimmick.
Oh, because they're putting a ton of fun and never before seen cool features into their cloud mining service?
Clicking buttons to boost your hashrate every day is fun? If I made a cloudmining company where you could boost your hashrate 10 times a day would it be 10 times as fun?
It's only "fun" because you have the illusion that you are making extra money but really after all that clicking/arbitrary games you are only making as much as you would have earned if the games never existed.
Oh, because they let you buy different hash power for different pools?
Do you not find it suspicious that they don't actually mine on those pools and instead calculate the earnings?
Oh, because they have a forums where people get rewarded for meaningful posts (heaven forbid!)?
You mean rewarded for circlejerking/and banned for any form of criticism? Sounds like a great place to have a non-biased discussion!
This is the one time a company has created their own forum for censorship purposes and turned out to be entirely trustworthy right?
Is it because they're creating a healthy coin? God forbid there be an actual company launching a coin with financial prowess and innovation behind it.
Innovation? You're joking right?
Here's the puppet-masters take on Hashcoin:
HashCoin is what we've been working on for months, under Project Prime. It is, I'm confident to say, the single biggest advancement for cryptocurrency since the original Bitcoin white paper.
Our initial ICO round will happen in the next 2-3 weeks. Our minimum investment floor is 1 million USD, and the line of investors and banks is forming :grinning:.
Its VERY clear why most coins have not done well. Technical innovation does not make a coin popular. Marketing, business strategy, adoption, and scale do.
Only the GAW CEO could announce to his cultists that he is inventing a coin, premining it, selling million dollar batches, and not get laughed at.
He might even be right though, all it takes is a massive marketing campaign towards ignorant noobs to make money.
By the way, a company could buy only BTC mining hardware, mine bitcoins, and sell Scrypt mh/s contracts based on what their SHA-256 mining power is. For example, the pool that someone buys a 1mh/s hashlet on, lets say multipool, posts earnings per mh/s on average. If you have an SHA-256 miner getting .1 btc a day, and sold contract for 1mh/s scrypt that generates average .001 a day, you can sell 100 1mh/s Scrypt contracts and that's all just theory.
Occams razor: "among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected".
You can make up many complicated scenarios where they might be able to payout, but a ponzi is the simplest explanation.
So regardless what kind of power they bought from Bitmain, they have it, and everything can always be intertwined mathematically. I believe everything you've ever flamed about in this topic was covered, but forgive me if I missed a few non essential points. Good day
Yes I agree, the 5PH/s from Bitmain is most likely legit. I'm willing to bet that as soon as they bring it online, they will provide the public with their mining address as every legit company would.
The question is why they have refused to prove they are mining up to this point.
Clearly I'm not the only one who thinks it's a ponzi/sketchy/untrustworthy, so why sacrifice potential customers when all it takes is a few seconds to prove without a doubt that they are not a ponzi?