Topic: Are terrorists only muslim in religion? - page 35. (Read 42412 times)

I disagree with you. Islam encourages to deal with dissent. At the moment it is the most aggressive religion. Muslims not only hate not only other religions, but very aggressive towards those Muslims who violate the rules of Islam.

actually the answer is no
because every religion teach people to be good instead of being bad so muslim also a religion same as every religion.
so terrorists is human being no about religion

I don't think terrorist is belong to any religion, most of them using religion as the tools to drag more followers, I believe when a teaching is taught to harm other innocent people is not a religion, all religion teach us to be a peaceful human being

Takiyya. 

Here are some "real muslims" for you.


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-tradecenter-rahman-funeral-idUSKBN1612DO?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews

Thousands of mourners gathered in a small Egyptian town on Wednesday for the funeral of the Muslim cleric known as "the blind sheikh" who was convicted of conspiracy in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing in New York.....

Carrying signs that read "we will meet in heaven" and chanting "we will defend you with blood and soul, Islam," hundreds of mourners gathered at Al-Gamaliya, his hometown in Egypt's Nile Delta province of Dakahlia, to wait for Abdel-Rahman's body as it made its way back from the U.S. via Cairo.

The Egyptian-born Abdel-Rahman, who lost his eyesight due to childhood diabetes and grew up studying a Braille version of the Koran, remained a spiritual leader for radical Muslims even after more than 20 years in prison.

As an adult he became associated with the fundamentalist Islamic Group and was imprisoned and accused of issuing a fatwa leading to the 1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar al-Sadat, against whom he had railed for years.

Abdel-Rahman was still an important figure in radical Islam even after years in prison. A year before his al Qaeda followers pulled off the most destructive assault on U.S. soil, the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Osama bin Laden had pledged a jihad to free Abdel-Rahman from prison.

When Mohammed Mursi, a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, began his short-lived presidency of Egypt in 2012, he said winning the sheikh's freedom would be a priority. The jihadists who attacked an Algerian oilfield and took hostages in 2013 also demanded his release.

Yet supporters paint him as a revered scholar who faced injustice and torture....

Here. Educate yourself.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades

TLDR; the Pope sent an Army to take the Holy Land from Muslims. Not only did it end badly, but we managed to look like assholes as we raped, pillaged and destroyed a whole bunch of shit that had nothing to do with our "Holy Task". Killed a whole bunch of Jews in the Rhineland (admittedly, this was a rogue faction, but that kind of what I'm getting at). Assholes come in many flavors. White and Black. Christian, Jew and Muslim. Don't forget, assholism float to the top, like cream.

So, Church sanctioned terrorism vs some crazy guys. I'll take the crazies any day.

In my country we say that a spoonful of tar spoils a barrel of honey. Even if one Muslim commits a terrorist act in the name of Islam then it is an occasion to think about what this religion teaches, and there are hundreds of Muslims. Because of their attacks killed innocent people. I think that no religion is worth even one human life. I believe that Islam needs to banned in the countries where most of the population are not Muslims.

Most terrorists are Muslims, but by no means all terrorists are Muslims, and most importantly not all Muslims are terrorists. The world now considers that all the terror attacks and was the work of terrorists in the name of Muslims, so everyone thinks the terrorists are Islamic. And all take advantage of that situation, when acting in the name of Muslims to impose Islam.

Perhaps that is true. But you should remember that it takes just one individual to kill thousands of innocent civilians. So even if just 0.00009 percent of the Muslims are terrorists, then everyone should be really concerned about it. Terrorism is associated with Islam because a vast majority of those who commit terrorist attacks justify them based on the Islamic verses.

muslim are not terorist. America make muslim look as terorist. Maybe you must have muslim friend to know about real muslim and than you will know muslim not like as media preach.

Not all muslims are Terrorist. Even if all terrorist attacks were carried out by Muslims, you still could not associate terrorism with Islam. Those terrorists would represent less than 0.00009 percent of all Muslims. It means that there are a lot of Good guys out there who represent islam. One fact shows that Non-Muslims make up the majority of terrorists in the United States: According to the FBI based from the journal I read, 94% of terrorist attacks carried out in the United States from 1980 to 2005 have been by non-Muslims. We have absolutely no justifiable grounds to blame Muslims for terrorism. By the way I'm a Catholic. I don't blame any religion from terrorist attacks. People has their own perspective. Only God can judge them.

Please don't mistake what those fools practice. Islam is an Abrahamic faith, and one of our brothers if you are Christian or Jewish. Also, there have been quite a few Christian terrorist. I say this as a Christian. You may want to look at some of the recent domestic terrorism in the USA, like Dylan Roof, Timothy McVey, or the Unabomber. Unabashedly Christian 

Not exactly, you see on the course of History Islamic Terrorism had just two periods; it's birth and expansion and nowadays.
And the interesting thing is what powers it is enlightenment. This word doesn't quite stand for "smarter", but "more informed", this under Islamic things means to actually know what those books say. While most of Muslims were illiterate Islam flowed more peacefully going only by the parts told to them; this resulted also on Islamic odd sub-sects mainly where Arabic wasn't their language, giving traditions unthinkable to associate to Islam, such as the sex mountain or the dig up of the dead at Indonesia.

The Jewish Terrorism, for an instance, was a reaction to Islam and wasn't, at the best was an overreaction, considering the Islamic factions weren't engaging terrorism but warfare: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks

If you want, then you can even talk about Buddhist extremism in Sri Lanka and Myanmar, and Hindu extremism in India. Perhaps also Jewish extremism in Israel. But then, if you analyze closely, you will find out that the extremist behavior shown by these people is simply a counter-reaction to the Islamic attacks against them.

Small?

Infinitesimal.

Islam owns modern terrorism, lock stock and barrel.

Over 30,000 cases of Islamic Terrorism since 9/11, worldwide.

www.thereligionofpeace.com

Since most moslems are terrorists i reckon its true.

Their figures are way too small compared to Islamic terrorism.
Even too small compared to Anarchist Terrorism or Jewish Terrorism, if you want to go through History.

But have you heard of the extremist christians? Even wiki has an article about it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism

And guess what: VANDALISM and ARSON aren't quite terrorist attacks, but VANDALISM and ARSON...
What those figures portrait is "number factoring" by redefining the meaning of terrorism.