I am not a robot, but I fear that when I become old, the robots will attack me and eat my medicine for food.
Fortunately, there is Old Glory insurance for that.
https://screen.yahoo.com/old-glory-insurance-ad-000000469.html
Topic: Are you a robot? (Read 3110 times)
well i m not a robot but work like a roobt hard work .. 
for bitcoin sure 
for bitcoin sure
No, i am not a robot!
I'm human...
I'm human...
I'm Terminator 
Hasta la vista, baby
Hasta la vista, baby
I'd say the simulation argument scenario is just a subset of the technological singularity scenario.
I read somewhere that in the near future (if not already) it will be possible to create artificial brains in a computer simulation. The author went on to presume that when this happens the amount of artificial brains will eventually outnumber the real ones. Once this happens the odds of you being an artificial brain will be more likely than you being real.
that goes not only for brains, but for a (our) whole (artificial/simulated) world, and it's called the Simulation Argument. http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html
That's the singularity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhj6fDDnckE - D. Hofstadter makes good points regarding the possibility (and calls Kurzweil crazy when he is on his side
) - You can skip like the 1st 10 minutes of the video. 
Quote
RE: I read somewhere that in the near future (if not already) it will be possible to create artificial brains in a computer simulation. The author went on to presume that when this happens the amount of artificial brains will eventually outnumber the real ones. Once this happens the odds of you being an artificial brain will be more likely than you being real.
in my humble opinion, It must be that the problem of capability of self development and learning that they do no have discern yet
I read somewhere that in the near future (if not already) it will be possible to create artificial brains in a computer simulation. The author went on to presume that when this happens the amount of artificial brains will eventually outnumber the real ones. Once this happens the odds of you being an artificial brain will be more likely than you being real.
that goes not only for brains, but for a (our) whole (artificial/simulated) world, and it's called the Simulation Argument. http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html
Psychiatry is a delusion, it is false science.
Psychiatry is a delusion, bla bla bla.. Then everything is a delusion, so what? Knowing that doesn't change anything. "adapt delusion and live It"
psychology, neuroscience and psychiatry, etc are "soft" sciences, not pesudo-science (like supernatural bullshit). Their object of study is one of the most complex objects we know... so it will be very hard for it to become an hard science. Plus, it's possible that our experience of being a brain will never be well explained, unless we could simulate it on a computer, i.e. as an objective phenomena, rather than subjective.
I read somewhere that in the near future (if not already) it will be possible to create artificial brains in a computer simulation. The author went on to presume that when this happens the amount of artificial brains will eventually outnumber the real ones. Once this happens the odds of you being an artificial brain will be more likely than you being real.
Now imagine that someone can reproduct your brain performances and intelligence, he would prefere the machine to you, and those whatever your size and importance.
in fact, it would lead to go without you
you are dead
Psychiatry is a delusion, it is false science.
Psychiatry is a delusion, bla bla bla.. Then everything is a delusion, so what? Knowing that doesn't change anything. "adapt delusion and live It"
psychology, neuroscience and psychiatry, etc are "soft" sciences, not pesudo-science (like supernatural bullshit). Their object of study is one of the most complex objects we know... so it will be very hard for it to become an hard science. Plus, it's possible that our experience of being a brain will never be well explained, unless we could simulate it on a computer, i.e. as an objective phenomena, rather than subjective.
I read somewhere that in the near future (if not already) it will be possible to create artificial brains in a computer simulation. The author went on to presume that when this happens the amount of artificial brains will eventually outnumber the real ones. Once this happens the odds of you being an artificial brain will be more likely than you being real.
and if these artificial brains began to be more performers than humans ?? there, human beings will begin to appreciate truly its place in this world
Psychiatry is a delusion, it is false science.
Psychiatry is a delusion, bla bla bla.. Then everything is a delusion, so what? Knowing that doesn't change anything. "adapt delusion and live It"
psychology, neuroscience and psychiatry, etc are "soft" sciences, not pesudo-science (like supernatural bullshit). Their object of study is one of the most complex objects we know... so it will be very hard for it to become an hard science. Plus, it's possible that our experience of being a brain will never be well explained, unless we could simulate it on a computer, i.e. as an objective phenomena, rather than subjective.
I read somewhere that in the near future (if not already) it will be possible to create artificial brains in a computer simulation. The author went on to presume that when this happens the amount of artificial brains will eventually outnumber the real ones. Once this happens the odds of you being an artificial brain will be more likely than you being real.
Psychiatry is a delusion, it is false science.
Psychiatry is a delusion, bla bla bla.. Then everything is a delusion, so what? Knowing that doesn't change anything. "adapt delusion and live It"
psychology, neuroscience and psychiatry, etc are "soft" sciences, not pesudo-science (like supernatural bullshit). Their object of study is one of the most complex objects we know... so it will be very hard for it to become an hard science. Plus, it's possible that our experience of being a brain will never be well explained, unless we could simulate it on a computer, i.e. as an objective phenomena, rather than subjective.
yes, i'm a biological robot
Psychiatry is a delusion, it is false science.
Psychiatry is a delusion, bla bla bla.. Then everything is a delusion, so what? Knowing that doesn't change anything. "adapt delusion and live It"
Who am i 
maybe yes
I say this cause I feel "ROBOT" more than the standard
I say this cause I feel "ROBOT" more than the standard
That word was first used in R.U.R. by K. Čapek - a czech writer that was inspired by middle age word "robota", that was used for mandatory working on monarch's fields and domain (like 4 days a week; for free ofc.).
So if you are doing something you don't want to for some other people you trully are Robot
I are robot 0_0
Humans react from fear or love. If you react out of fear, use an ego and negativity in your life, then you're a robot in the terms of the song. If you act out of love, then you are a human, as that as how we naturally bonded thousands of years ago before the corruption of our society began.
If you don't know, then you're probably a robot.
Just as the picture you just posted, the red pill is understandably a psychedelic that shows you the universal consciousness, the blue pill is ego and where you are free to wake up, forget it all happened, and free to believe whatever you want to believe - ie, not the truth.
If you don't know, then you're probably a robot.
Just as the picture you just posted, the red pill is understandably a psychedelic that shows you the universal consciousness, the blue pill is ego and where you are free to wake up, forget it all happened, and free to believe whatever you want to believe - ie, not the truth.
Both love and fear are emotions not solely expressed by humans. Multitudes of beings are afflicted by them. If you have a pet dog or cat you may have noticed this to be true. Feeling either of these emotions (or any offshoot of them) does not make you any more or less human. Likewise, not feeling emotions does not make you inhuman or a robot either. Hence, the picture I posted is your typical false dilemma (choose "A" or "B" senario), which completely overlooks the possiblity of there being (at the very least) another third choice. Nirvana is in essence this third choice (or perhaps more accurately no choice) whereby one is free of all emotions and does not "feel the need" to make any choice.
I would also like to point out that not knowing what you are is merely another possible truth and it also by no means makes you a robot. Instead, it is the acceptance that "you know you know nothing". For example, thousands of years ago we believed we were the center of the universe and it was only 500 years ago we believed the Earth was flat. You for example, believe humans naturally bonded out of love before society became corrupt, whereby I would argue humans initially bonded out of fear for their survival before modern society allowed us the possibilty to bond merely in the name of love.
I think you're taking the song a little too literal. I don't mean humans are cyborgs with computer chips inside of us.
I never said humans are the only beings who feel love or fear. All of our emotions stem from positivity or negativity.
And in regards to being the center of the universe, the truth is we are the center of the universe. Your consciousness, that is. Space and time are illusions of this grand reality. We are not separate from a creator, we are the creator.
Jump to: