Topic: Are you happy with stakes payment method ? (Read 1352 times)
payment methods are quite good and even has been running for a long time. so I think when even though there are people who complain of this but not many. stakes can deliver results beyond the allegations and this is better than the coin result is even smaller.
May be I misunderstood but even if they give you $100 per week and still they don't reach soft cap, you won't receive payout. Stakes and some particular amount per week — those are payout mechanisms, they don't matter if project don't reaches softcap.
By the way, you are hero member, do Bitcoin paying bounties, why waste time on ICOs?
By the way, you are hero member, do Bitcoin paying bounties, why waste time on ICOs?
there is no problem for me while all bets are calculated fairly and correctly.
because here we are free to choose the projects we follow and can choose the rules that are suitable for ourselves.
because here we are free to choose the projects we follow and can choose the rules that are suitable for ourselves.
To be honest, I am not happy with the stakes payment method because the only basis is the tenure of an account to this forum. It is impossible to rank up from member to full member and I believe that you will be investigated and possibly banned if every you rank up. This is just my opinion based on the post and telegram messages from those who ranked up.
At the moment yes, I am happy with the stakes payment, that is because, I experienced to join bounty where the initial payment is stakes and then the team decides to pay fixed amount of token which destroys the essence of bounty pool allocations.
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
That's is truly correct bounty participants mostly they will receive unsatisfied rewards, sotimes they can receive with nothing working for a month because the project is scam, paying btc or any altcoin weekly easy distinguish how project legitimate.
I suggest participating in bounty campaign half btc or any coins have value in the market to the participant weekly rewards for their tash and the half reawards is token came from the icos project full pay after end of token sale.
For me both methods are good as long as the project is successful I have joined a lot of projects that was paused because of failing to reach the softcap, so I never received payment, stakes or a specific amount of token as long as the project is good and can reach the softcap.
There is no other choice, we must obey the rules that have been made. I once followed the bounty for a fee of $ and calculated per post (signature campaign). That is quite profitable, even though it is subsequently accumulated with the number of tokens. But worth it. The actual stakes system is the same, it is only to facilitate the calculation, especially if the number of participants is very large.
It is not as if people have a choice, the campaign managers are the ones that determine the rules of the campaign and a far as I can see the method of calculating stakes for each participant is the one that is the most common and it is also the one that seems to be the most fair since the people that contributed more to the campaign should get more rewards for their efforts.
Stakes are not very convenient. I do not always understand the principle by which they are exhibited. This is impractical, inconvenient and I think that with this method of exhibiting there is a huge chance of error
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
Already, many ICO teams pay for the services of the ICO bounty campaign participants in a fixed number of their tokens produced. For example, even the ICO WebSpaceX project, the signature of which I am now carrying, is paid to a member of my rank with a fixed number of WSPX tokens — 312,500 tokens per month.However, the payment of a certain number of tokens per week or month does not mean significant earnings. It all depends on the prospects of the ICO project itself, since the price of earned tokens will depend on it.
Using the fixed amount amount token bounty in the weekly period is a good thing because bounty hunters know the number of tokens they get without having to wait any more especially the calculation of stake sometimes takes a long time
It is difficult to say about contentment now. In general, the whole thing is how to choose the bounty, especially for the signature of the campaign, but even with the most accurate research, there is still a chance that all the work will be in vain
I ma very happy with the stakes method because ultimately, even if they make it a fixed amount, if the total bounty allocation is not much, them people would still get poor rewards, so if the total token allocation for the bounty is worthwhile, then the tokens allocated per stake would be worth the effort as well.
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
Indeed, a fixed payment would be more attractive, everyone would know what it works for, but I do not think that everyone will do it, because it will not be beneficial for everyone, and there is no likelihood that the project will not be a scam, what payment it would be did not guarantee
For me, stakes payment method is better than tokens per week you can get. Because projects giving tokens per week have the chance to only give allocation to their bounty less tokens or coins, while stakes payment can give all tokens allocated for bounty.
Yes, I am. We afe discussing this now because of many failed projects, they are now struggling to raise funds in the market. There is a reason why Stake based bounty worked before so well, you have a direct stake in the project by holding the tokens of the projects. Whatwe need to do is to hope things change for better and have investors confidence restored
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
To be honest, I'm not always happy with the result. I'm doing my job, and I have less credit than I expected. Often because of this I have conflicts with managers. I don't like it
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
I'm generally Ok with stakes. I think its fait for everyone. My only problem is with BM's not sticking to their promises at the onset of the bounty. Also another problem is BMs leave the application form open until the end of the bounty. therefore the more participants the lesser the rewards. That's why when the bounty pool is small and the campaign is running for many weeks I tend to stop and leave the campaign because I know that come end of bounty, I would most likely get close to nothing especially with social media campaigns.
Stakes payment method is good and fair for me.
Right shares of what work have accomplished in a certain ICO projects.
Good basis for earning in bounty projects.
Right shares of what work have accomplished in a certain ICO projects.
Good basis for earning in bounty projects.
It is a risk that the ICO will not reach it`s soft cap and we have to deal with it. It is the same when we
are investing it could happen that the price will crash when the coin enter the market.
We have to make our research and calculation to make a good decision in which bounty to take
participation.
Jump to: