And how can this be achieved? if each ico project has a different budget for the bounty company. And the number of people involved also depends directly on the budget and on the bounty Manager. Especially then not to average the amount of remuneration
Topic: Are you happy with stakes payment method ? - page 8. (Read 1352 times)
there are some bounty managers that are not doing staking method in bounty but do the fix amount but i find it unfair for those who are doing an extra effort to achieve larger stakes. i am in favor of staking because for me it is fair.
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
I think we need an independent foundation that will distribute our rewards through a smart contract. Ie, before the ICO, the company contributes the budget of the bounty campaign to this fund, almost like a bounty platform, only honestly and transparently.
Yeah
Stakes payment is pretty fine than a fix amount because
If the company gave $100,000 to a bounty manager
If its task only pays off $10-50 each and if only $50,000 was given, what happens to the remaining?
Stakes distribute accordingly depends on everyone's effort
So i would prefer a stakes payment method
Stakes payment is pretty fine than a fix amount because
If the company gave $100,000 to a bounty manager
If its task only pays off $10-50 each and if only $50,000 was given, what happens to the remaining?
Stakes distribute accordingly depends on everyone's effort
So i would prefer a stakes payment method
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
Its fine with this method, when the project cant reach the softcap it will be consequense for us to didnt get paid. I think there some ICOS project who want to pay bounty participant with btc or eth. 
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
This is the reality bad side of the bounty program in this platform. And we need to accept the fact that the system in crypto industry was also too risky if we involved ourselves here, so expect the unexpected things to be happen to us as well.
I like there are different options to choose the project and bounties. It is good that some coins provide staking reward, so you will get more coins by staking more, it feel like cryptocurrency savings interest , so more coins you get in the wallet, more coins you can staking in the end. There are different staking rate rewards, some pay very well, but some not so good.
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
For me as long as it can give me earning it is still okay for me. There are so many ways for a bounty campaign in giving rewards from bounty. Some reward gives high earnings, some are low and some does not have any value so it was sad for me. Whether it can be staked or not as long as it can give me earnings it is still good. 
Happy or not it is only one relevant method to pay fair bonuses. It is another story what sometimes we can see fraud from the bounty team side. That is sad ((
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
The profit would still vary on the project's development and performance especially in the crowdsale. At times like this, it should not be surprising to not earn that much profit due to the downtrend which is currently present. Stake method promotes fairness among the participants nd in order to organize the payment and we should not have a problem with that.
what you mean is exactly right. even some bounty hunter participants seemed to be slightly reduced to survive, even they paused while waiting for the price of a good coin to return. like BTC and Ethereum which are currently experiencing price declines in the exchange market.
Amazix implemented it, they have fixed pool of tokens, but at the same time they don't have fixed dates. Bounty hunters always work 2 times more that it stated earlier for even smaller amount. They prolong multiple times bounty
Stakes are good for collective understanding how the reward is going to be paid. I see only advantages in stakes distribution system. And of course you can not predict the amount of total partcipants, and their rank
I prefer to use a betting system with a "stake" model because it is fair for voters to bounty followers, if we are scam or not we choose which projects are good ico
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
If ICO does not reach the softcap it will not matter if it's a stakes or a fixed system.
What kind of system it is depends on ICO founder and/or bounty manager. There are bounty campaigns with fixed token amounts per week - for example:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-4rtechnologies-ico-biggest-bounty-upto-15million-to-share-5069088
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
Honestly i hate to see that my stakes bigger but the value of it is worthless, i mean why they dont implement a fixed amount of token each weeks so that hunters can get it right away to avoid of waiting for distribution after the ICO, or pay all hunter from any kind of coins that are already listed so that the price of their token will not get affected after distribution, so they can really protect the price of it from dumpers. There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
I think that the Stake method is quite suitable. That's the way they can ensure that they are all fairly and fairly paid. Moreover, at the beginning of the bounty they do not yet know how much they will take in their ICO. A fixed contribution, such as in ETH, would of course be great, but at this point, they can not guarantee that they will take enough to pay their Bounty participants.
I'm okay with it as I think it makes it fair for everyone. I accept whatever is given by the stakes as I choose projects I believe in and want to succeed.
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
There are ICO bounty that works that way so it must depend to the company's budget fr its promotion. but expect the distribution to be delayed so if you plan to sell after it gets listed then you'd be surprise what's left for you to sell because the price will definitely dip before you can attempt to dump. You'd rather chose to have more tokens if you are willing to wait til its price bounce back.
There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?
Stakes are fair, I think. But everyone knows that it would be better to get a fixed reward in Ethers or Bitcoin because you never know what you will receive. (Token from scam, dead or alive promising project) Jump to: