Are you happy with stakes payment method ? - page 7.

djgtr

sr. member

Activity: 951

Merit: 250

Quote from: FLHippy on December 02, 2018, 09:01:53 AM

Quote from: kentrolla on September 29, 2018, 07:50:57 AM

There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?

Stakes are fair, I think. But everyone knows that it would be better to get a fixed reward in Ethers or Bitcoin because you never know what you will receive. (Token from scam, dead or alive promising project)

Yes I am, I look at it as the same ith tht token and it is better if stakes so that it would be easy to identify. In bitvoin money can be easy and difficult at the same time. Their are many rewards that we can get if you are working hard on it. Happy and glad to know more about bitcoin as well.

zhengqi

member

Activity: 632

Merit: 60

I think we really need a fixed payout. Also, there must be a limit of participants. In this case, everyone will be happy.

yecats

member

Activity: 395

Merit: 14

Yes, I'm fine with the method of stakes reward

but it would be great if they will create a new method and make it more easy to understand and will benefit all of the bounty hunter, and it's important for us a bounty hunters understand how the stakes are calculated. In terms of fixed stakes why not Wink

great idea Grin

Korkorjkk

member

Activity: 546

Merit: 11

The stakes method is good, especially if there are only few people who participated in the bounty. But the problem comes in when the project does not reach soft cap and the bounty hunters do not get paid. But in general, the stakes method is very good.

IndianaJons

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 10

Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network

Quote from: kentrolla on September 29, 2018, 07:50:57 AM

There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?

There are a lot of projects. Somewhere they are paid with project tokens, somewhere with a fixed rate in ETH or BTC.
As a rule, a fixed rate is small. In case of success of the project where you were paid with tokens, you can earn a few dozen times more than in a project with a fixed rate.
Everyone chooses their own project.

kalashnikovski

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 10

I think if initially wrote the number of coins that I get for certain social activities, it would be easier for me, because I could roughly estimate my profit for participating in a particular program of generosity.

Viscera

sr. member

Activity: 660

Merit: 250

I'm happy to get alot of stakes because of high ranking account but actually the best thing i could really have is to receive stake after the campaign period.

Whisper555

jr. member

Activity: 168

Merit: 1

W12 – Blockchain protocol

I liked the system more, when I knew what one steak is equal to (how many tokens), it made it possible to approximately count the number of tokens you would receive as a reward and the total amount in dollars. And now find it harder. Although everyone is happy, the team just needs to regulate the number of participants.

VPScreator

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

There is no difference between a fixed rate and the usual distribution of funds from the total amount, as a result, tokens still fall in price.

tiptopgemdotcom

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1000

Truly decentralized stable asset

Quote from: mary0919 on December 02, 2018, 10:17:28 AM

Quote from: kentrolla on September 29, 2018, 07:50:57 AM

There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?

For me as long as it can give me earning it is still okay for me. There are so many ways for a bounty campaign in giving rewards from bounty. Some reward gives high earnings, some are low and some does not have any value so it was sad for me. Whether it can be staked or not as long as it can give me earnings it is still good.

In my opinion it will more fair to give stakes based on user's post quality. Mainly bounty managers always try to control the social network content with boosting the reward but rising quantity doesnt mean same amount of quality. It is not secret that, higher earnings will lead to increase post quality. I check telegram groups in my free times and try to read opinions of other crypto bounty hunters. Result is distrubing because of memes,stupid content,useless opinions like "when moon","when lambo" Cheesy

marados

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 10

Definitely fixed token amount as reward would be a lot better because bounty hunters would know from start how much they are going to earn each week. But then again stakes can be beneficial too if bounty is good and not a lot people join for it. But lately this definitely isn’t the case because there are more and more bounty hunters each day. So definitely bounty campaigns should start with fixed token amount for each rank.

igor.vanyutin.83

member

Activity: 294

Merit: 10

I am pretty happy with stakes, because if I look at ICOs that are offering token based rewards, they are just silly. You won't get more than 100 USD per great article, or earn more than 200 USD for wearing a signature for 12 weeks.

Ini35

member

Activity: 448

Merit: 12

The reward gotten through stakes has always been the best for me, instead of using a direct payment system. The bounties i participated in, where direct payment system is used, the reward most times is usually very small. This will have more effect when your rank is still very low. I have even stopped participating in bounty campaigns with such system of distribution.

jacafbiz

hero member

Activity: 2128

Merit: 530

PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market

This is shouldn't be an issue, there the various method has been proposed before by different campaign and it all work out well, we are debating the issue of stake now because ICOs are struggling to raise fund in the market and is affecting bounty campaigns and participants. I think both have their advantages and disadvantages but the main thing for the bounty hunters is for the project to become successful when is successful no one will be concern about what he gets, or how he get it

Rob768

full member

Activity: 324

Merit: 100

There are advantages and dasadvantages. For example, if there is a small number of participants it's better to choose stake system to recieve tokens form all county pool. But There is a huge number of participant it's better to choose fix payments.

muhdede

member

Activity: 158

Merit: 10

as long as it's published transparently I think it's fine. the provision of stake must also be determined from the quality of the bounty hunters themselves whether good or not. because each manager has a calculated stake of each participant

auroboros

sr. member

Activity: 588

Merit: 254

In my opinion, the payment system with stake is the most common and fairest way, in this way developers and participants will get certain satisfaction, one of the most uncomfortable things to do with stakes is if the participants exceed expectations of development, then the result will be very little for bounty participants

bit..what?

jr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 1

I think the stake system is ok and i am actually happy with it.
It would be best, however, if a bountie already had enough money to pay the bountie participants, even if the softcap is not reached.

amanarora_1

member

Activity: 448

Merit: 10

I'm agree with you, the amount should be fixed for each participant or according to their rank because stakes system are so annoying sometime and sometime it's not worth. We need payment according to our hardwork, so definitely this need to be change. Only managers can do it and take any action first.

pharaon

full member

Activity: 753

Merit: 100

Quote from: kentrolla on September 29, 2018, 07:50:57 AM

There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?

I fully agree with your proposal, because I, too, are much better / more comfortable when there is a fixed rate, or a certain number of tokens, for certain work, rather than stack, which are counted at the end of the campaign. I hope the projects (campaign bounty) will change their vision of this.

Topic: Are you happy with stakes payment method ? - page 7. (Read 1352 times)