Topic: Are you in favor of same sex marriage? - page 17. (Read 22846 times)
When two people like each other, they have a lot in common and love each other to protect each other. they have the right to be married even if they are homosexual. So I support homosexual marriage. And you should support it.
when it comes to that im gay too and theres a lot of discrimination to us but sometimes i questioned myself did i do something to them ?
this is a very sensitive topic, here in my country, same sex marriage is not yet accepted and is being criticized by our government and the church. As for me, I'm not for it, but I think they have the right to do as they please, if a guy wanna marry a guy then go ahead and do so, just be ready with the consequences of your decisions.
this is a very sensitive topic, here in my country, same sex marriage is not yet accepted and is being criticized by our government and the church. As for me, I'm not for it, but I think they have the right to do as they please, if a guy wanna marry a guy then go ahead and do so, just be ready with the consequences of your decisions.
If people do no harm to others why would you stop them from doing whatever makes them happy ? I'm completely in favor
It makes me sad that many people on this forum, presumably interested in technology and progress may assert so many retrograde statements about civil rights of people who have not chosen their nature and have no responsibility in it. If people loves each other and accept the duties of building up a family they should also have rights.
As Jim Jeffries beautifully pointed:
"If you're against gay marriage, don't fuckin marry another man! Easy as that!".
Ofc I'm all in favor.
I have more doubts on lgbt adoptions tho, I'd like to see some scientific research, psychologists, ecc make a large study about it and the consequences on the kid.
While I've no doubt that it really depends on what kind of human beings the parents are rather than their sexual orientation, I still want to see some science..
"If you're against gay marriage, don't fuckin marry another man! Easy as that!".
Ofc I'm all in favor.
I have more doubts on lgbt adoptions tho, I'd like to see some scientific research, psychologists, ecc make a large study about it and the consequences on the kid.
While I've no doubt that it really depends on what kind of human beings the parents are rather than their sexual orientation, I still want to see some science..
No beacuse god create boy & girl. Base on the bible the girl is from the boy.You love the same gender is not good example for being human.Merriage is a good dicession human being.Dont love a same gender.
God also created gays, genius. Then again you are religious so not much can be expected from your prehistoric brain. Based on the bible, slavery and rape are also ok, you are fine with that?
As Jim Jeffries beautifully pointed:
"If you're against gay marriage, don't fuckin marry another man! Easy as that!".
Ofc I'm all in favor.
I have more doubts on lgbt adoptions tho, I'd like to see some scientific research, psychologists, ecc make a large study about it and the consequences on the kid.
While I've no doubt that it really depends on what kind of human beings the parents are rather than their sexual orientation, I still want to see some science..
"If you're against gay marriage, don't fuckin marry another man! Easy as that!".
Ofc I'm all in favor.
I have more doubts on lgbt adoptions tho, I'd like to see some scientific research, psychologists, ecc make a large study about it and the consequences on the kid.
While I've no doubt that it really depends on what kind of human beings the parents are rather than their sexual orientation, I still want to see some science..
No beacuse god create boy & girl. Base on the bible the girl is from the boy.You love the same gender is not good example for being human.Merriage is a good dicession human being.Dont love a same gender.
Our stock price also does not allow, same sex marriage, the part-time job cannot believe, unexpectedly Ann has a person gay, the sky, pay my understanding, accept not
Some are in favor of that but me I am not in favor for same sex marriage . I believe that God created only a man and a women a man that for only for a women .
In my humble opinion that's absolutely okay. We should let people follow their desires and to not judge each other too much...
No. It is not Okay. If the gays want to have sex together, then let them have it. No one is stopping them from having it. But we can't grant legal status for such relationships because they are not normal. The major stumbling block is that the gays are not loyal to each other. They change their partners every two weeks or so. So are we going to recognize all these as marriages?
Not normal.by today's judgemental standards. Gay union has always been around ever since. It wasn't taboo'd then. And loyalty isn't dependent on sexual orientation. A straight guy or woman can change partners whenever they want. Gay couple should have all the legal benefits that a normal married couple enjoy
Why should they be provided with all the legal benefits, when the nature of the relationship is not normal? I agree with the other users on this issue. What they need is medical treatment and not legal recognition.
What is ''normal'' Other animals can be homosexuals too. Since when has medical treatment actually treated any homosexual and made hi straight again? Are you dumb? Do you think you could become gay all of the sudden?
In my humble opinion that's absolutely okay. We should let people follow their desires and to not judge each other too much...
No. It is not Okay. If the gays want to have sex together, then let them have it. No one is stopping them from having it. But we can't grant legal status for such relationships because they are not normal. The major stumbling block is that the gays are not loyal to each other. They change their partners every two weeks or so. So are we going to recognize all these as marriages?
Not normal.by today's judgemental standards. Gay union has always been around ever since. It wasn't taboo'd then. And loyalty isn't dependent on sexual orientation. A straight guy or woman can change partners whenever they want. Gay couple should have all the legal benefits that a normal married couple enjoy
Why should they be provided with all the legal benefits, when the nature of the relationship is not normal? I agree with the other users on this issue. What they need is medical treatment and not legal recognition.
I'm not in favor of same sex marriage. Men and women were created for each other. I don't want to judge others but that is what is on the Bible. I respect the LGBT people but marriage should be between a male and female only.
I have no objection to this. It's a matter between the two of them. As long as they don't affect other people, they feel good about themselves. Now it seems that many states in the United States are legal.
In my humble opinion that's absolutely okay. We should let people follow their desires and to not judge each other too much...
No. It is not Okay. If the gays want to have sex together, then let them have it. No one is stopping them from having it. But we can't grant legal status for such relationships because they are not normal. The major stumbling block is that the gays are not loyal to each other. They change their partners every two weeks or so. So are we going to recognize all these as marriages?
Who cares? Straight men would cheat on their wives just as easily if they could but it's not so easy for us. We have to seduce women, with money or looks and even so there are still a ton of cheaters out there, men and women. Marriage itself is stupid anyways.
In my humble opinion that's absolutely okay. We should let people follow their desires and to not judge each other too much...
No. It is not Okay. If the gays want to have sex together, then let them have it. No one is stopping them from having it. But we can't grant legal status for such relationships because they are not normal. The major stumbling block is that the gays are not loyal to each other. They change their partners every two weeks or so. So are we going to recognize all these as marriages?
Not normal.by today's judgemental standards. Gay union has always been around ever since. It wasn't taboo'd then. And loyalty isn't dependent on sexual orientation. A straight guy or woman can change partners whenever they want. Gay couple should have all the legal benefits that a normal married couple enjoy
In my humble opinion that's absolutely okay. We should let people follow their desires and to not judge each other too much...
No. It is not Okay. If the gays want to have sex together, then let them have it. No one is stopping them from having it. But we can't grant legal status for such relationships because they are not normal. The major stumbling block is that the gays are not loyal to each other. They change their partners every two weeks or so. So are we going to recognize all these as marriages?
I also think there are not any problems, if they feel happy. Society is far more advanced, everyone has their own desires, should not stop them.
In my humble opinion that's absolutely okay. We should let people follow their desires and to not judge each other too much...
No, I am not in favor of same sex marriage, as according to the Bible it is a sin. God from the beginning of the world created man and even other animals male and female. After creating Adam He did not come to Adam with another man of the same sex, rather He brought to Adam a female. This clearly demonstrate the type of relationship that God wants us to have, that is male and female, not the same sex like male to male or female to female. Those clamoring for same sex marriage are going against God's will.
No, I do not support it. It is better to allow two (three-ten and so on) citizens (regardless of gender, etc.) to enter into a legal agreement that would link these people legally, with all those leaving that and require a minority.
That is not needed because usually homosexual couples are not loyal to each other. And that is the norm. An average homosexual can have anywhere from 10 to 1,000 sexual partners a year. I am not saying that all the heterosexual couples are ultra-loyal, but there the couples are at least "expected" to remain loyal to each other. Among the homosexuals, there is no such requirement.
Who cares, though?
Doesn't make a difference. If they like and can live with each other, then why should we worry.
Jump to: