Yes. If I realize that I am playing way too much in gambling and cannot even control it anymore then I will put myself in self-inclusion or if it's a physical casino then I'd probably tell my wife to tell them to ban me from the premises.
We cannot be prideful when it comes to this kind of thing. If we know to ourselves that we are losing more than what we can afford to lose then maybe it's time to set things straight. Also, it could ruin our relationship with our family if we keep on spending money that is not for gambling purposes anymore.
I'd do it. But as of now, I can still think straight, and sometimes I don't play for 2 to 3 days because I just want to take a rest after a long losing streak which I think is still a good sign that we are in control.
Topic: Are you willing to go to self-inclusion? - page 5. (Read 672 times)
So my question, are you willing to go to this length for self inclusion because you are afraid that you will want to comeback to a casino and have the feeling of winning the jackpot and then become what others experiencing beginners luck and become addicted in the end?
Individually, I agree with independent inclusion, as this person does, what he does can lead to social disability, This means that someone who has a negative background in gambling by understanding other people's perspectives can appreciate attitudes towards independent inclusion.As far as I know, someone has been inclusive, in other words, the person has positioned themselves towards the behavior of other people or groups towards solving problems that occur in gambling or gambling addiction, So it is very reasonable if they no longer want to return to the casino for the reasons above, I think inclusive actions must be appreciated and respected, it is a person's right to decide to take positive and negative actions.
I was just reading or following someone in Facebook and he is a former casino employees. And some of his followers are giving testimonies on the ill effects of gambling in their lives. But one confessions caught my attention when he mentioned that he got lucky in one casino and just betting for a less than a dollar and then he hits the jackpot and won big.
that is the rarest situation in gambling when you bet penny and win a jackpot.Quote
And he says that he lives near a casino and so what he does is that he requested to be ban from entering or self inclusion so that he will prevent himself from turning into addicts because he have seen his friends or families becoming addicted to it.
that shows how he love himself and not wanting to deal more in gambling.Quote
So my question, are you willing to go to this length for self inclusion because you are afraid that you will want to comeback to a casino and have the feeling of winning the jackpot and then become what others experiencing beginners luck and become addicted in the end?
Nope , I know my capacity andwill not need to act such thing . 
Well first of all, that is not called self-inclusion but rather self-exclusion. And for people who feel like they do not have control over themselves and their gambling habits, it is indeed a wonderful tool. Unfortunately with the amount of digital casinos, it might not work as intended, unless that person only goes to physical casinos and they have excluded him.
But I think that learning true self control and discipline is a better way to go.
But not everyone has the patience for that.
Personally, I would not self-exclude unless I felt like I did not have myself under control. Then I would.
But I think that learning true self control and discipline is a better way to go.
But not everyone has the patience for that.
Personally, I would not self-exclude unless I felt like I did not have myself under control. Then I would.
~
No. Not that self-inclusion is bad or anything. It's just that I'm fully aware of what I'm doing and can actually control myself. Even now with me gambling, I'm able to control the amount I'm playing with, or at least comparatively better than in the past when I started. In the end self-inclusion is for people who can't stop, or feel that they can't. People who are about to turn into addicts. Now if we're assuming that I am an addict and would willingly do so, naturally in my sound mind I would. I mean that's why I'm not an addict in the first place lol. Now if you are, you most likely are pretty impulsive when it comes to gambling and self-exclusion probably will not be enough. You'd probably need external help really.
Also I think this is possible in a physical establishment but more difficult to do online because the
person can just open a second account when they feel they need to get back to gambling.
person can just open a second account when they feel they need to get back to gambling.
Depends on where you live and the laws of that country.
Most self-exclusion lists are not for each casino, they are state-wide and shared by all casinos and bookies that have a license there, normally once you have asked either the authorities or an NGO who helps with that your name should be on the list of every operator there, be it a strictly online game provider or every single physical location.
In some cases it's useless, in others it's pushed to the extreme, for example in some states being on a self-exclusion list means you're not going to be able to stay at a hotel owned by MGM for example, you're not only banned for the casino but from all their locations.
You might even go back to the casino and request that your account be unbanned if you are not disciplined.
Again, it depends on your country, some have only lifetime or yearly periods, and depending on that you might have to lawyer up to get yourself unbanned before the year ends, which is pretty normal, the self-exclusion won't be effective if you could reverse it with a click.
After a big win it is wise to take a break... it often happens that after that we get into a storm (long losing streaks, risky situations with much higher bets) and lose everything, even more than we gained. It's something I rarely get to do, but that's me.
The character from the story went to the extreme, after a big win he decided to stop forever and ensure himself by requesting self-exclusion from the casino. It's a bit too much in my opinion, but generally speaking, maybe he made the right step here... at least he will enjoy spending that money on other more important stuff in his life. I doubt I would ever do that, we are all different, so we can just respect his decision... he made his choice and that's it.
The character from the story went to the extreme, after a big win he decided to stop forever and ensure himself by requesting self-exclusion from the casino. It's a bit too much in my opinion, but generally speaking, maybe he made the right step here... at least he will enjoy spending that money on other more important stuff in his life. I doubt I would ever do that, we are all different, so we can just respect his decision... he made his choice and that's it.
We know how to control ourselves than another while gambling. If I win big, I will not go on self-exclusion and I will not use the money to gamble. But for people that can not control themselves, such people can go for self-exclusion. But online gambling self-exclusion is not effective like offline self-exclusion.
Is that not self-Exclusion?
Definitely it is self-exclusion that he meant. 
So my question, are you willing to go to this length for self inclusion because you are afraid that you will want to comeback to a casino and have the feeling of winning the jackpot and then become what others experiencing beginners luck and become addicted in the end?
This gambler is worth emulating because he is wise. Many won big in casinos and ended up gambling off the fortune. He decided to be excluded because he understood himself. Maybe he doesn't have self-control and the only way to avoid becoming an addict is to avoid gambling. Some gamblers can control their gambling activities even if they win big, hence they don't need self-exclusion.
But for self-exclusion to be effective, there should be a level of discipline because casinos are many. If you are not careful, you might register in another casino and start gambling again. You might even go back to the casino and request that your account be unbanned if you are not disciplined. I will gladly go into self-exclusion if it is the ideal means of avoiding gambling addiction.
Is that not self-Exclusion?
Yes, it is self-exclusion, not inclusion. OP made an error, I am sure. Its a great idea and its easy for non addicted people and gamblers to to such a act but I suspect
it would be harder, if not all together impossible for someone addicted and who are chasing
losses to pull the plug so to say and opt for total Exclusion.
Exactly, the person from OP's story who was easily able to self-exclude themselves from casino and gambling activities is someone who has not yet become addicted, and luckily for him, he was able to win before becoming an addict. Some people become addicts first before they ever win anything substantial, and so they are unable to stop themselves from gambling afterwards. it would be harder, if not all together impossible for someone addicted and who are chasing
losses to pull the plug so to say and opt for total Exclusion.
Also I think this is possible in a physical establishment but more difficult to do online because the
person can just open a second account when they feel they need to get back to gambling.
Self-exclusion will require a lot of discipline if it must be practiced on online platforms because of the ease at which you can easily start gambling again, even on another platform. person can just open a second account when they feel they need to get back to gambling.
So my question, are you willing to go to this length for self inclusion because you are afraid that you will want to comeback to a casino and have the feeling of winning the jackpot and then become what others experiencing beginners luck and become addicted in the end?
No, I would not. On the contrary I kinda like those casinos where my luck is at the most extremes, thus I visit them more than often. Regarding addiction after winning the jackpot- I think that man has overdramatised such outcome. If he has such unbending will that allowed him to get casinos self-inclusion he could cope with his outbursts of gambling.
Is that not self-Exclusion?
Its a great idea and its easy for non addicted people and gamblers to to such a act but I suspect
it would be harder if not all together impossible for someone addicted and who are chasing
losses to pull the plug so to say and opt for total Exclusion.
Also I think this is possible in a physical establishment but more difficult to do online because the
person can just open a second account when they feel they need to get back to gambling.
Its a great idea and its easy for non addicted people and gamblers to to such a act but I suspect
it would be harder if not all together impossible for someone addicted and who are chasing
losses to pull the plug so to say and opt for total Exclusion.
Also I think this is possible in a physical establishment but more difficult to do online because the
person can just open a second account when they feel they need to get back to gambling.
I was just reading or following someone in Facebook and he is a former casino employees. And some of his followers are giving testimonies on the ill effects of gambling in their lives. But one confessions caught my attention when he mentioned that he got lucky in one casino and just betting for a less than a dollar and then he hits the jackpot and won big.
And he says that he lives near a casino and so what he does is that he requested to be ban from entering or self inclusion so that he will prevent himself from turning into addicts because he have seen his friends or families becoming addicted to it.
So my question, are you willing to go to this length for self inclusion because you are afraid that you will want to comeback to a casino and have the feeling of winning the jackpot and then become what others experiencing beginners luck and become addicted in the end?
And he says that he lives near a casino and so what he does is that he requested to be ban from entering or self inclusion so that he will prevent himself from turning into addicts because he have seen his friends or families becoming addicted to it.
So my question, are you willing to go to this length for self inclusion because you are afraid that you will want to comeback to a casino and have the feeling of winning the jackpot and then become what others experiencing beginners luck and become addicted in the end?
Jump to: