Don't think that Satoshi would reveal himself. It would just be a bad move and best avoided.
Some people love him some not so much so rather be safe.
Topic: As it turns out, Craig Wright actually is Satoshi! (Read 13026 times)
Well anything goes to be quite frank. We will never know who the real SATOSHI is without concrete evidence and proof. This maybe just another good write up job from Coindesk to attract more readers to its fold.
Long back itself Graig Maxwell have been claiming him as Satoshi describing various reasons. But importantly revealing his identity doesn't gonna make any impact but as mentioned it might gain some reputation to coindesk. The innovation made by Satoshi is really good. What is Dr Craig Wrights stand on the blocksize debate, does anyone know what side he stands on? I haven't seen any comments from him on it although I don't take the guy too seriously.
But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.
Dr. Wright says unlimited blocks. But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.
i do accept that they do have a good theory but they should have backed that up with a bug free code. 
Well anything goes to be quite frank. We will never know who the real SATOSHI is without concrete evidence and proof. This maybe just another good write up job from Coindesk to attract more readers to its fold.
...
Shame on you, CSW!
Shame on you, CSW!
Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright."
Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013.
Though some of the information had or may resembles the person who died last 2013 due to a car accident, it has not been founded that he is really satoshi. So all we have right now are just speculation and wild guesses. Only one thing to prove who the real satoshi is and that is to move the Bitcoin address that is under Satoshi's or sign a message from it.
Though it is hard to believe but among all the individuals who claims to be satoshi only the person they considered dead last 2013 have a solid concrete evidence showing that he is satoshi. But I don not buy the idea and probably satoshi is still alive and watching how bitcoin evolves and was busy selling his millions of bitcoin at his disposal.
What is Dr Craig Wrights stand on the blocksize debate, does anyone know what side he stands on? I haven't seen any comments from him on it although I don't take the guy too seriously.
But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.
But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.
Dr. Wright says unlimited blocks.
What is Dr Craig Wrights stand on the blocksize debate, does anyone know what side he stands on? I haven't seen any comments from him on it although I don't take the guy too seriously.
But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.
But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.
...
Shame on you, CSW!
Shame on you, CSW!
Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright."
Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013.
Though some of the information had or may resembles the person who died last 2013 due to a car accident, it has not been founded that he is really satoshi. So all we have right now are just speculation and wild guesses. Only one thing to prove who the real satoshi is and that is to move the Bitcoin address that is under Satoshi's or sign a message from it.
Code:
https://books.google.com/books?id=LchFDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR23&lpg=PR23&dq=May+2007+satoshi&source=bl&ots=AqsKfX6HlE&sig=xfJ4YXOHY7NGD7kFVl2oZOlIhi0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiy_dLS04jSAhVB-WMKHXuPDV0Q6AEIUDAM#v=onepage&q=May%202007%20satoshi&f=false
So, Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned a real-world currency that wouldn't be used in the real world, e.g. Starbucks (no pun intended)? Shame on you, CSW!
I guess you are mostly nitpicking
Nowhere in the quote which you cited Satoshi says about Bitcoin as a "real-world currency". In fact, you are outright distorting his words since he just says about using Bitcoin across "Internets". Nevertheless, if you consider a currency used in such a way as a real-world currency (which I basically agree with, given the role Internet now plays and the place it now takes), you shouldn't then claim that it can't be used in the real world since it directly follows from your own assumption that Internet is (a significant part of) the real world
...
Shame on you, CSW!
Shame on you, CSW!
Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright."
Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013.
You monkeys ready for the next Wright act? You about to get REKT!
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 278
Bitcoin :open immutable decentralized global fair
...
Shame on you, CSW!
Shame on you, CSW!
Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright."
Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013.
Satoshi: http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/015014.html
<follow link to source, or>
So, Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned a real-world currency that wouldn't be used in the real world, e.g. Starbucks (no pun intended)? Shame on you, CSW!
Quote
Yea, that was the primary feature that caught my eye. The real trick will be to get people to
actually value the BitCoins so that they become currency.
actually value the BitCoins so that they become currency.
<follow link to source, or>
Code:
https://books.google.com/books?id=LchFDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR23&lpg=PR23&dq=May+2007+satoshi&source=bl&ots=AqsKfX6HlE&sig=xfJ4YXOHY7NGD7kFVl2oZOlIhi0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiy_dLS04jSAhVB-WMKHXuPDV0Q6AEIUDAM#v=onepage&q=May%202007%20satoshi&f=false
So, Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned a real-world currency that wouldn't be used in the real world, e.g. Starbucks (no pun intended)? Shame on you, CSW!
How do I earn wings?
If Satoshi Nakamoto is an individual it would be the most wise for her/him not to reveal her/himself. Craig Wright appears to be an individual with narcissistic issues, it would more than surprise me if he'd be Satoshi after not being able to supply proof. In fact we pretty much know it isn't him indeed. May the real creator(s) remain a mystery, that's a good thing.
This topic has gone to 14 pages yet we all know that it is a clickbait topic without any facts whatsoever. RawDog please stop creating topics of these kind, they lead to nowhere. The fact is that there is no proof that Craig Wright is actually Satoshi Nakamoto. For this reason topics such as these are not necessary.
These are all rumors and they will continue forever as everyone wants to be claiming the owner of bitcoins. The old thing which can stop all these false news is that Satoshi Nakamoto reveals himself in real and tell the media by coming live on media with solid facts.
I just wonder if he is still alive ?
If Satoshi Nakamoto is an individual it would be the most wise for her/him not to reveal her/himself. Craig Wright appears to be an individual with narcissistic issues, it would more than surprise me if he'd be Satoshi after not being able to supply proof. In fact we pretty much know it isn't him indeed. May the real creator(s) remain a mystery, that's a good thing.
Vlad's pillow?
How do I earn wings?
Last I heard you have to sign a contract with Victoria Secrets.
FYI:
Or put 25 cents under Vlad's pillow for the tooth fairy wings.
If Craig Wright actually is Satoshi!
Then
Larry the Cable Guy actually is the Real Tooth Fairy.
FYI:
Shock anyone back to sanity.
Then
Larry the Cable Guy actually is the Real Tooth Fairy.
FYI:
Shock anyone back to sanity.
How do I earn wings?
If Craig Wright actually is Satoshi!
Then
Larry the Cable Guy actually is the Real Tooth Fairy.
FYI:
Shock anyone back to sanity.
Then
Larry the Cable Guy actually is the Real Tooth Fairy.
FYI:
Shock anyone back to sanity.
This topic has gone to 14 pages yet we all know that it is a clickbait topic without any facts whatsoever. RawDog please stop creating topics of these kind, they lead to nowhere. The fact is that there is no proof that Craig Wright is actually Satoshi Nakamoto. For this reason topics such as these are not necessary.
These are all rumors and they will continue forever as everyone wants to be claiming the owner of bitcoins. The old thing which can stop all these false news is that Satoshi Nakamoto reveals himself in real and tell the media by coming live on media with solid facts.
I just wonder if he is still alive ?
Jump to: