In a peacetime society, guns cause violence to stop, because criminals don't like to be shot.
Criminals who want guns depend on and need you to champion gun ownership.
Unless you are in Maryland. Then they prefer the status quo, which is that guns are banned, and they know that everyone but them is disarmed.
Nobody ever said a non unified approach is worth shit.
How much more unified can you get than "Carrying a gun? Go to jail." Or are we back to the "gun control only works if every country in the world implements it, except it woks in Japan despite no unification?"
Japan is consistent.
So is Maryland.
So? How is that the same?
It is the same. Both places are consistent in their bans. How it is different?
Japan is a nation. Maryland is a state within a nation. Duh.
Gun legislation is on a state level, not on countrywide level. So it might as well be a country from gun control standpoint. Only difference is it's easier to get into MD from the border areas than into the island of Japan. I guess we should set up border fence everywhere and rifle through everyone's cars and baggage every time anyone crosses state lines. That should fix any problems.
My god you're an idiot. Oh, I said that before. I wonder why. Go back and read the very dialog we had, quoted right here. Look for the term "unified". Jesus fuck.
Thank you for quoting me. It accentuates the point.
