Pages:
Author

Topic: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer - page 13. (Read 175855 times)

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 502
ckolivas just released this new option.

but nobody have compiled a new version of cgminer yet.

--shaders

win32: http://www.mediafire.com/?prbt07a4scihahm

thnx bud.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 254
doesnt seem to work right for me..
Each time i try to launch it, my fourth 7970 crashes..

But it works well, with an earlier version
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
ckolivas just released this new option.

but nobody have compiled a new version of cgminer yet.

--shaders

win32: http://www.mediafire.com/?prbt07a4scihahm

Sweet. Works on 7970 - gets the optimum values automatically.
full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 100
Under Ubuntu 12.04 with 12.6 drivers and sdk  with the latest build of cgminer the highest you can set the thread concurrency is 2048 I'm trying to figure why I guess that is the limit in cgminer and not reaper if the kernels are similar?

four 5850s

"intensity" : "11,11,11,11",
"vectors" : "1,1,1,1",
"worksize" : "128,128,128,128",
"kernel" : "scrypt,scrypt,scrypt,scrypt",
"gpu-engine" : "0-750,0-700,0-700,0-700",
"gpu-memclock" : "1000,1000,1000,1000",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.000,0.950,0.950,0.950",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"scrypt" : true,

this works perfectly at -I 11  ~675 kh
at -I 12 start errors miss-target

I get the same exact results under reaper

worksize 128
aggression 11
threads_per_gpu 2
sharethreads 18
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 2048

aggression 11 works great no errors  ~ 675 kh
aggression 12 throws errors


Ok the best results for reaper for me seems to be

worksize 128
aggression 12
threads_per_gpu 2
sharethreads 18
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 5760

this works great no errors ~1030kh pool reports roughly same

I don't have any 5850s running under windows to seem if the results are the same. The same settings that work on both give nearly identical khs in both programs, but the difference is the thread concurrency maximum of 2048 in cgminer vs. 5760 in reaper? this even make sense lol?

I have a couple 5870s I'm need to test this out on but I'm thinking 4 x shader count is the optimum?

I just noticed that reaper builds the buffer at 360mb @ 5760tc   4 x 360 = 1440
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
ckolivas just released this new option.

but nobody have compiled a new version of cgminer yet.

--shaders

win32: http://www.mediafire.com/?prbt07a4scihahm
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 254
ckolivas just released this new option.

but nobody have compiled a new version of cgminer yet.
legendary
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
i used shaders option with this release http://www.mediafire.com/?0ue7860yv89o05y on windows 7 64 bit & getting this error

Code:
[2012-07-24 23:43:53] cgminer.exe: --shaders: unrecognized option

My bat file is cgminer.exe --scrypt --url http://lc.ozco.in:9332 --userpass xxx:xxx --shaders 1600 -I 13
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
any body else having troubles running cgminer on p2pool?
  Fixed as of version f98774c
hero member
Activity: 988
Merit: 1000
Here is a more detailed breakdown of the most common AMD/ATI Based mining cards with their shader/processor count:
Look up your card, and then in the "Clock rate" column, your "Core (MHz)" and the corresponding processors/shaders is the first # in column "Config core"

Some cards have the same model numbers yet they differ in their shader/processor count

HD 5xxx https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units#Evergreen_series_.28HD_5xxx.29

HD 6xxx https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units#Northern_Islands_.28HD_6xxx.29_series

HD 7xxx https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units#Southern_Islands_.28HD_7xxx.29_series

legendary
Activity: 976
Merit: 1003
Added the --shaders option now

More better, more effectively
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
LitecoinTalk
any body else having troubles running cgminer on p2pool?
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Added the --shaders option now
- Make the thread concurrency and lookup gap options hidden on the command line and autotune parameters with a newly parsed --shaders option.

So you should only need to try --shaders and -I now. Note that any intensity above 13 is a gamble and highly dependent on hardware/software combination as to whether it's better, so -I 13 is a good start.

Here's the table again:
Code:
GPU  Processing Elements
7750 512
7770 640
7850 1024
7870 1280
7950 1792
7970 2048

6850 960
6870 1120
6950 1408
6970 1536
6990 (6970x2)

6570 480
6670 480
6790 800

6450 160

5670 400
5750 720
5770 800
5830 1120
5850 1440
5870 1600
5970 (5870x2)

And for those who need me to spell it out, let's say you have a 5830, try this first:
--shaders 1120 -I 13
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
I assume you read my long post about intensity, maximum buffer size, valid shares, trampled memory, thread concurrency and so on? I mined for half hour on coinotron and it returned valid shares for that half hour and coinotron reported back the same rate I was hashing at.

I readed that post

but I don't undestend why:

cgminer with Nvidia GF 560 OC (--scrypt --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 -w 256 -g 1 -I 20) say
 [2012-07-23 21:48:33] Maximum buffer memory device 0 supports says 268353536, your scrypt settings come to 536870912
but continues work

but with ATI 6930 and 6870 (--scrypt -I 10 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 4096 -g 2) with the same message
 [2012-07-23 21:58:43] Maximum buffer memory device 0 supports says 134217728, your scrypt settings come to 268435456
says the following
 [2012-07-23 21:58:43] Error -61: clCreateBuffer (padbuffer8), decrease CT or increase LG
 [2012-07-23 21:58:43] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
1. it reports you are over the limit and the device merrily goes away trashing data
2. it reports you are over the limit and you try to set it over that limit and the device just refuses

Devices respond differently to different invalid values. That's why it's a warning.
legendary
Activity: 976
Merit: 1003
I assume you read my long post about intensity, maximum buffer size, valid shares, trampled memory, thread concurrency and so on? I mined for half hour on coinotron and it returned valid shares for that half hour and coinotron reported back the same rate I was hashing at.

I readed that post

but I don't undestend why:

cgminer with Nvidia GF 560 OC (--scrypt --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 -w 256 -g 1 -I 20) say
 [2012-07-23 21:48:33] Maximum buffer memory device 0 supports says 268353536, your scrypt settings come to 536870912
but continues work

but with ATI 6930 and 6870 (--scrypt -I 10 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 4096 -g 2) with the same message
 [2012-07-23 21:58:43] Maximum buffer memory device 0 supports says 134217728, your scrypt settings come to 268435456
says the following
 [2012-07-23 21:58:43] Error -61: clCreateBuffer (padbuffer8), decrease CT or increase LG
 [2012-07-23 21:58:43] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
I've updated the target difficulty testing in the git tree. I'm reasonably sure it wasn't working properly before.
tested on coinotron works fine now
what internal difficulty on coinontron?
with internal difficulty 256 dont work on intensivity >10 on old and updated git's
I assume you read my long post about intensity, maximum buffer size, valid shares, trampled memory, thread concurrency and so on? I mined for half hour on coinotron and it returned valid shares for that half hour and coinotron reported back the same rate I was hashing at.

coinotron difficulty is
"target": "000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000c0cc0c0000"
default is
0xffff

Edit: There is an upper limit to difficulty it will accept, but that's only relevant to solo mining magnitudes, and then it will safely submit more attempts at solving it than necessary, not the other way around, so you should never miss a share unless you screw up your tc/lg settings making for invalid work.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
I've updated the target difficulty testing in the git tree. I'm reasonably sure it wasn't working properly before.

win32: http://www.mediafire.com/?0ue7860yv89o05y  Wink
thanks alot Smiley

on a somewhat related issue: can I nail you some time on getting a mingw gcc environment capable of compiling btc and ltc running?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
I've updated the target difficulty testing in the git tree. I'm reasonably sure it wasn't working properly before.

win32: http://www.mediafire.com/?0ue7860yv89o05y  Wink
legendary
Activity: 976
Merit: 1003
I've updated the target difficulty testing in the git tree. I'm reasonably sure it wasn't working properly before.
tested on coinotron works fine now
what internal difficulty on coinontron?
with internal difficulty 256 dont work on intensivity >10 on old and updated git's
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
I've updated the target difficulty testing in the git tree. I'm reasonably sure it wasn't working properly before.
tested on coinotron works fine now
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Has anyone gotten decent hashrates with a 5970?

The highest multiple I can set thread-concurrency is 1600. With intensity 11, I get about 130kh/s per gpu.  At intensities 12 and over, the best I can get is 250kh/s from each gpu on the first card the both gpus on the second 5970 get "SICK".

How are you guys able to use such high thread-concurrency settings?
Your system ram matters as well as your OS with this.
Pages:
Jump to: