Pages:
Author

Topic: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer - page 19. (Read 175855 times)

vip
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
heh
getting
607khash and 477kahsh from 2 x 7970
be nice if both were 607 Tongue

cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http://lc.ozco.in:9332 -u Graet.4 -p p --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 1 --auto-fan --gpu-fan 50-90 --gpu-engine 1100-1165 --auto-gpu --gpu-vddc 0.88
hero member
Activity: 535
Merit: 500
Try decreasing the values, like this:
--thread-concurrency 2048 -g 1 -I 11
and see what happens
Getting 173 khash/s now with --thread-concurrency 4200. Still lower than Reaper, but maybe more thread-concurrency tweaking will give extra juice.
 UPD: 180 khash/s with --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 3500 -g 1 -I 17. Looks like thats a maximum.
hero member
Activity: 675
Merit: 514
Try decreasing the values, like this:
--thread-concurrency 2048 -g 1 -I 11
and see what happens
hero member
Activity: 535
Merit: 500
Getting 30 khash (--scrypt --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -g 2 -I 17) with latest version comparing to 190 kh/s with Reaper on 6770. Pool showing same 30 kh/s. Maybe drivers/sdk fault? Using 12.1/2.6.

Change -g 2 to -g 1.
Nothing changed.
 Can't get it even to work with another rig (5770 & 6870). Getting clkernel error.
sr. member
Activity: 385
Merit: 250
im getting this on my 6870X2 any ideas why?



Code:
cgminer version 2.5.0 - Started: [2012-07-21 13:27:49]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):24.0 (avg):33.3 Kh/s | Q:6  A:2  R:0  HW:0  E:33%  U:1.6/m
 TQ: 2  ST: 2  SS: 0  DW: 4  NB: 2  LW: 14  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to http://notroll.in:6332 with LP as user phantitox.1
 Block: 1d7d315f19c507a46f520b6a6b4d2b12...  Started: [13:28:44]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  63.0C 100%    |  12.9/ 14.5Kh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:0 U:0.80/m I:15
 GPU 1:  54.0C 32515RPM |  18.5/ 20.6Kh/s | A:2 R:0 HW:0 U:1.61/m I:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-07-21 13:27:47] Started cgminer 2.5.0
 [2012-07-21 13:27:49] Probing for an alive pool
 [2012-07-21 13:27:49] Long-polling activated for http://notroll.in:6332/LP
 [2012-07-21 13:27:50] Pool 0 http://notroll.in:6332 alive
 [2012-07-21 13:28:30] Accepted cfa3c70a.d78d8df3 GPU 1
 [2012-07-21 13:28:31] Accepted 220fa3a9.d768cc99 GPU 1
 [2012-07-21 13:28:44] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
 [2012-07-21 13:29:10] Accepted 72785a06.e2fd5124 GPU 0
sr. member
Activity: 413
Merit: 250
Getting 30 khash (--scrypt --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -g 2 -I 17) with latest version comparing to 190 kh/s with Reaper on 6770. Pool showing same 30 kh/s. Maybe drivers/sdk fault? Using 12.1/2.6.

Change -g 2 to -g 1.
hero member
Activity: 535
Merit: 500
 Getting 30 khash (--scrypt --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -g 2 -I 17) with latest version comparing to 190 kh/s with Reaper on 6770. Pool showing same 30 kh/s. Maybe drivers/sdk fault? Using 12.1/2.6.
vip
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
never got over 292khash on single card, never got 4 card rig to run on reaper

decided to go back to -I 16 lose some hashes but rejects under 1% is where its at imo Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
LitecoinTalk
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http://lc.ozco.in:9332 -u Graet.7 -p p --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -I 18 -g 1 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 810-910 --gpu-vddc 1.05 --temp-target 85 --temp-overheat 95 
on my 6950s is getting 449Khash /card across 4 card rig A:582 R:23 is a bit high tho might try -I 17 Smiley
and 450Khash on single card A:169 R:2 is ok tho

I'm rather pleased with this Cheesy

how much did reaper do?
vip
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http://lc.ozco.in:9332 -u Graet.7 -p p --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -I 18 -g 1 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 810-910 --gpu-vddc 1.05 --temp-target 85 --temp-overheat 95 
on my 6950s is getting 449Khash /card across 4 card rig A:582 R:23 is a bit high tho might try -I 17 Smiley
and 450Khash on single card A:169 R:2 is ok tho

I'm rather pleased with this Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Changed my 6850s core to 800 and now its pulling 220kh/s. Saddly I had to go leave so I left it at that. I'm gonna see how far I can go when I get back, that's already more then what I got with reaper at only a 50mhz overclock.

Sorry typos on my phone
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Bitcoin today is what the internet was in 1998.
ckolivas, could you also set a user-definable parameter to adjust the difficulty needed for submitting a share?
Instead of reading off the difficulty from the pool? I guess so... but not right now.

Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that each pool sends its difficulty requirement to the miner. Just when I was mining with P2Pool (Bitcoin), it would send difficulty 1 shares to my local P2Pool node even though the P2Pool share difficulty is much higher.
vip
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
Holy shit my 6850 pulled 207kh/s without an overclock with just intensity 14. I'll add a document with my settings for my 6850 and 5770 in a few.


Also catalyst 12.6 & sdk 2.6 are working fine for me now, weird but I'll take it.

I tried concurrency 3200 and 6144(better), any others I should try?
after a bit of messing round 427Khash/card over 4 x 6950s A:367 R:1
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http://lc.ozco.in:9332 -u Graet.7 -p p --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -I 16 -g 1 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 810-900 --gpu-vddc 1.05
legendary
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
I am getting 369 average on 5870 (only one card in system) with clock 850/1200 on Windows 7, 64 bit, aero enabled.

Code:
cgminer.exe --scrypt --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -g 1 -I 16 --url
http://notroll.in:6332 --userpass xxx:xxxx

with accepted = 150+ & Rejected= 0
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Holy shit my 6850 pulled 207kh/s without an overclock with just intensity 14. I'll add a document with my settings for my 6850 and 5770 in a few.


Also catalyst 12.6 & sdk 2.6 are working fine for me now, weird but I'll take it.

I tried concurrency 3200 and 6144(better), any others I should try?
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
with the new, i have set the -I to 16, and i get 210, with almost 0 stales, reaper could get 210 MAX, with 10% stales, this is soo goood!

Yup, increase in intensity certainly helped. Now at 338 at 16 and 340 at 17. At 18, kh/s jumps around a lot.
Time is averaged over 5 seconds, and at those high intensities the threads wont report in for over 5 seconds potentially so you'll get serious aliasing artefacts.
sr. member
Activity: 413
Merit: 250
with the new, i have set the -I to 16, and i get 210, with almost 0 stales, reaper could get 210 MAX, with 10% stales, this is soo goood!

Yup, increase in intensity certainly helped. Now at 338 at 16 and 340 at 17. At 18, kh/s jumps around a lot.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
LitecoinTalk
yah thats weird if i set mine to 14 it gets tons of rejects what card and settings were you using??

i use 2*6770, but only testing on 1, i use
Code:
cgminer --scrypt -o http://****:**** -u ** -p ** --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -I 14 -g 1

and O/C is set to 950/1300

ok, getting 10+ kh/s more with worksize 128 instead of 256

worksize 64 doesn't seem to increase speed under any combo, so thats a no go. Must.... tinker.... MOAWR.

It should also note that I'm basing my speeds off AVG after about 20 seconds. I'm just trying to get the settings into a close ballpark before I do long term stability.

i have just trying worksize  64, and i got more speed now

worksize 256: ~180 kh/s
worksize 128: ~190 kh/s
worksize 64: ~192.5 kh/s

with the new, i have set the -I to 16, and i get 210, with almost 0 stales, reaper could get 210 MAX, with 10% stales, this is soo goood!
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
win32: http://www.mediafire.com/?99lf1947fg0gdny

Includes commit g1711b4e, allowing up to intensity 20. There was another commit, but I'll rebuild it when enough has been changed.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
ckolivas, could you also set a user-definable parameter to adjust the difficulty needed for submitting a share?
Instead of reading off the difficulty from the pool? I guess so... but not right now.
Pages:
Jump to: