Pages:
Author

Topic: AUCTION - 8 rolls of new 0.5BTC Casascius Coins - page 9. (Read 11734 times)

legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
overview


ROLL 1 
USERAMOUNT
2weiX29
 

ROLL 2 
USERAMOUNT
2weiX29
Goat28

ROLL 3 
USERAMOUNT
slakeco 27.5

ROLL 4 
USERAMOUNT
slakeco 27.5

ROLL 5 
USERAMOUNT
Surpbitcoin 30
2weiX29
slakeco 27.5

ROLL 6
USERAMOUNT
Surpbitcoin 30
2weiX29
slakeco 27.5

ROLL 7 
USERAMOUNT
slakeco 27.5

ROLL 8 
USERAMOUNT
j_gillard 27.5
slakeco 27.5


ANY ROLL
USERAMOUNTROLLS
PsychoticBoy 28.81
nduck 28.71
DeaDTerra 28.61
LittleShop28.51
Otoh282
Severian281
crazy_rabbit27.81
mtbitcoin27.61
mtbitcoin261
legendary
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
bidding 28.7 for 1 roll which can be any
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
This bidding for any one or two rolls is really not making any sense.
also - will we be paying the amount bid by us or just the 0.1 over the second-highest bid (ala eBay)?

I bid

Roll #1: --> 29
Roll #2: --> 29
Roll #5: --> 29
Roll #6: --> 29
donator
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
28.6 BTC for any roll.
//DeaDTerra
donator
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1010
Parental Advisory Explicit Content
I bid 28.8 BTC for any available roll.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1004
28.5 for any single roll.
donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
28 BTC each for any 2 single rolls
vip
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1140
The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)
I guess it's just to be able to say "this is from the first batch ever"
or for the vanity-aspect of "123....."

Yes I agree I am just saying roll #1 isn't materially better than #2 (at least without seeing which coins are in it).  They are both rolls where all coins will be 121's.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
I guess it's just to be able to say "this is from the first batch ever"
or for the vanity-aspect of "123....."
vip
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1140
The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)
Just so you know, roll #1 isn't substantially earlier in sequence #2. Both are 50 random selections out of the 250 or so from the lot.  The private key cutting process mixes them up quite well, so to say its truly random is fairly accurate.

legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
This table of course is problematic when trying to display

"X for #a or #b and Y for #c and/or #d"
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
#1 2weiX 28.5 BTC
#2 Goat 28 BTC
#3 slakeco 27.5 BTC
#4 slakeco 27.5 BTC
#5 Superbitcoin 30 BTC
#6 Superbitcoin 30 BTC
#7 slakeco 27.5 BTC
#8 j_gillard 28 BTC

any
28.00 BTC Severian
27.80 BTC crazy_rabbit
27.60 BTC mtbitcoin
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
30 BTC for roll 5 or 6
vip
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
28 for #2

Thanks
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
28BTC for roll #8
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
that being said:


I bid

28.50 @ #1
27.50 @ #2
27.50 @ #3
27.50 @ #4
28.50 @ #5
28.50 @ #6
26.00 @ #7
26.00 @ #8
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
you should probably make an auction for each roll seperately and use the format the "unified asicminer orderbook" uses:


bid 28 @ roll 1
bid 27.7 @ roll 2
.
.
.
.
bid 26.5 @ roll 8

and then list the competing orders beneath your list of rolls.

i know its a hassle, but it's more transparent. I can't keep track of who bid for what.

also, no "x for any" orders.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
28 btc for any one roll.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
fgnfhfhfaa should had my morning coffee first.

I'll bid 56 for any two rolls out of 1 2 3 4 7 8

I'll bid 28.5 for Roll 5
I'll bid 28.5 for Roll 6
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1006
this space intentionally left blank
I'll bid 56 for any two rolls out of 1 2 3 4 5 8

I'll bid 27.6 for Roll 6
I'll bid 27.6 for Roll 7
Pages:
Jump to: