Pages:
Author

Topic: [Aug 2022] Mempool empty! Use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs! - page 9. (Read 83494 times)

legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7765
'The right to privacy matters'
To follow up on JJG.

If all you want to do is stack BTC

find a good exchange. you likely will need to do kyc.

buy 10 dollars a week for dca or
50 dollars a week for dca or
100 dollars a week for dca

let it stack at the exchange for 10 weeks or less

move it to a secure offline wallet.

that is a very simple safe method that does not have a lot of coins in an exchange most end up in a wallet off line.

it is very simple and lets you know what is at risk.  ie 1 to 10 weeks of dca.


if you like spending and collecting btc for business etc.

you will need an ln wallet.

kraken is a kyc exchange do kyc.

put
 100, 200 ,300 usd cash into it.

then buy btc and look for my thread on using krakens LN wallet.


it all cases above when you have coins on an exchange you lose control and co8ns can be stolen or frozen.

an offline wallet with good backups is safer.

A good goal is

90% of your btc offline.
0-5%  for  LN
0-5%  for dca

I have tested two LN wallets

nicehash
kraken

they do work and fees are 0.00000014 btc per move max move of 1.5 btc

I would never keep 1.5 btc on an exchange
I stay under 0.1 btc on

all the exchanges I use.

I am USA based.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 68
Freedom speech and decentralized places. 💕
I understand nobody can know for 100% but do you guys and girls think we will see fee's go down to example 15 sat/vB for Medium Priority again anytime soon?
Since the massive blockchain spam seems to be caused by just one entity, it's impossible to predict anything about this.

Hi and thanks for the reply. Could you please explain what you mean by this? I don't understand (my English is not so good or BTC knowledge) is it one person or one company or some group that consciously doing this spam to destroy for the rest of us?  Cry
If so... why? and for what reason... I hope it will get and end ASAP if this is the case.



Could you please explain what you mean by this?
See this post.
Thanks LoyceV for helping me find the explanation, I have read it and it make sense and now I start to understand it more. Have a good evening.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I understand nobody can know for 100% but do you guys and girls think we will see fee's go down to example 15 sat/vB for Medium Priority again anytime soon?
Since the massive blockchain spam seems to be caused by just one entity, it's impossible to predict anything about this.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10155
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I wanted to ask a question and instead of creating a new topic I tried to find a topic where the question could be answered so I take a chance here.
I understand nobody can know for 100% but do you guys and girls think we will see fee's go down to example 15 sat/vB for Medium Priority again anytime soon?
I haven't been active with bitcoin so long so I lack to much exp to understand and read about this. but you guys and girls here know quite a lot so I hope you can answer my question.

Is this the new normal we been seeing lately?

The fee's when the post is created and I see this as "low" if comparing with last months, but if i compare with maybe one year ago it's still very high. Maybe it was high a year ago also.. But I want to remind myself that fee's was much lower in the past. It's maybe some obvious reason for this that I don't know about. If you have time and feel for helping me I really be thankful.


When situations are not very certain, there is an expression, prepare for the worst and hope for the best, and I doubt that any of us can really know where fees are going to go or if this might be the new normal. 

Many of us are likely looking for various ways to save fees, which also inspires developments that could end up attracting members to new solutions that are going to come to light, and surely many of the longer term forum members are preferring ways to use self-custodial solutions rather than custodial solutions, even though some folks get sucked into performing their transactions on custodial solutions because they want to reduce the fees that they are paying.. which is kind of a sad outcome, even though we know that some members go down this road. 

Even I have been suggesting that members who might be buying BTC on exchanges (that might only be $10 to $100 at a time) build up their balances to somewhere between $500 to $1k before sending that BTC to some kind of private wallet - since with these higher fees, we can see that there are risks to creating a bunch of UTXOs with smaller levels of balances, even balances between $10 and $100.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 68
Freedom speech and decentralized places. 💕
I wanted to ask a question and instead of creating a new topic I tried to find a topic where the question could be answered so I take a chance here.
I understand nobody can know for 100% but do you guys and girls think we will see fee's go down to example 15 sat/vB for Medium Priority again anytime soon?
I haven't been active with bitcoin so long so I lack to much exp to understand and read about this. but you guys and girls here know quite a lot so I hope you can answer my question.

Is this the new normal we been seeing lately?


The fee's when the post is created and I see this as "low" if comparing with last months, but if i compare with maybe one year ago it's still very high. Maybe it was high a year ago also.. But I want to remind myself that fee's was much lower in the past. It's maybe some obvious reason for this that I don't know about. If you have time and feel for helping me I really be thankful.




Thank you  JayJuanGee for your reply and answer, very much appreciate it.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 896
ETF users don't need on-chain fees Wink
I never said they need them  Cool
I never said you said that Tongue But you never said that I said that you said that. Never mind, I'm going to get a drink Tongue

You guys need a break Tongue

Seriously though, I doubt fees will increase because of the ETFs. They will inevitably increase as long as people use bitcoin more and more. (and yes dkbit98 said this already  Tongue)
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
ETF users don't need on-chain fees Wink
I never said they need them  Cool
I never said you said that Tongue But you never said that I said that you said that. Never mind, I'm going to get a drink Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Cashback 15%
ETF users don't need on-chain fees Wink
I never said they need them  Cool
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Cashback 15%
I can't tell how this will continue, but for now mempool is no longer increasing.
Quiet times before the storm.
I think we can all agree that bitcoin on-chain fees are going to increase constantly if more people use it, with or without this hypothetical entity.
ETF finally got approved, so in 5 or 10 years low fees are going to be a rear occasion, unless we see some major protocol changes, and more people will use second layer solutions and/or lightning.
And let's not forget that halving is coming in ETA 100 days.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Have a look at the 30 day mempool fees:
Image loading...

This supports my theory that only one entity is responsible for the massive Ordinal spam. Recently, they had changed their "tactics" from paying $40 per dust transaction to abusing ViaBTC's free transaction accelerator. That lead to a very stable flood of transactions paying 23 sat/vbyte. That stopped after ViaBTC reduced the availability from 100 to 20 transactions per hour, and the spammer switched to paying around 30 sat/vbyte instead. That's no longer enough to make fees go up higher, but it created a "floor" under the fees for anyone who wants his transaction to be confirmed.
There are now so many transactions waiting at 23 sat/vbyte, that the purging fee is not much lower than that.
I can't tell how this will continue, but for now mempool is no longer increasing.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
It's not getting confirmed at all though, is it? Since I can see nothing but growth there.
About 10 hours ago, it flatlined, and at the same time, the lighter green area started to grow.
If I'd have to guess, that's because ViaBTC reduced their free accelerators from 100 to 20 per hour. So the spammers changed strategy.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 5814
not your keys, not your coins!
Only the "light green" area is growing. I'm pretty sure most of those are Ordinal spammers like this one, paying 23 sat/vbyte and abusing ViaBTC's free transaction accelerator with a bot to get their spam confirmed.
It's not getting confirmed at all though, is it? Since I can see nothing but growth there.
copper member
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1638
Top Crypto Casino
I hate to say it, but I think ViaBTC needs to shut off their free transaction accelerator. Only offer paid options going forward. The reason being, if Ordinals spammers cannot settle transactions out-of-band for free anymore, they will be forced to wait in line like the rest of us, or pay said transaction accelerators $100 to get in the next block - arguably more expensive than just paying a transaction fee.
Shutting down the free transaction accelerator won't help. They just need to make their captcha challenge harder for the bots. Let's say ViaBTC shuts down their free TX accelerator. Most of the network spammers still won't care spending a lot in fees since they are still making a ton of sats off their scam jpegs. It's the normal users like me and you that will feel the pinch in the end.

A visible example is Ethereum network that never even had any TX accelerators and the spammers made it unusable to normal users for a very long time. I am afraid the same is likely going to happen to the Bitcoin network if nothing is done at all. Those spammers won't just give up overnight, especially now that we haven't even reached the bull run level of hype.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I hate to say it, but I think ViaBTC needs to shut off their free transaction accelerator. Only offer paid options going forward. The reason being, if Ordinals spammers cannot settle transactions out-of-band for free anymore, they will be forced to wait in line like the rest of us, or pay said transaction accelerators $100 to get in the next block - arguably more expensive than just paying a transaction fee.
It would be much better if ViaBTC only rejects Ordinal transactions from their free accelerator.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 263
CONTEST ORGANIZER
The miners dont want this to stop because they do so much money with it so i dont see this steping back from inside.

What about the movement make from Ocean pool what are your toughts about that?


The good news is: it looks like Ordinal spammers are no longer willing to pay the highest transaction fees. At least that's something.
The bad news is: somehow they're still earning money from spamming their scam with millions of transactions.

I think the fee rates are fixed by the Ordinals platforms themselves.

I hate to say it, but I think ViaBTC needs to shut off their free transaction accelerator. Only offer paid options going forward. The reason being, if Ordinals spammers cannot settle transactions out-of-band for free anymore, they will be forced to wait in line like the rest of us, or pay said transaction accelerators $100 to get in the next block - arguably more expensive than just paying a transaction fee.

I think a combination of what you said plus some filters (the one i shared above) can do magic to relieves the mempool.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
The good news is: it looks like Ordinal spammers are no longer willing to pay the highest transaction fees. At least that's something.
The bad news is: somehow they're still earning money from spamming their scam with millions of transactions.

I think the fee rates are fixed by the Ordinals platforms themselves.

I hate to say it, but I think ViaBTC needs to shut off their free transaction accelerator. Only offer paid options going forward. The reason being, if Ordinals spammers cannot settle transactions out-of-band for free anymore, they will be forced to wait in line like the rest of us, or pay said transaction accelerators $100 to get in the next block - arguably more expensive than just paying a transaction fee.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I noticed something peculiar:
Image loading...

Only the "light green" area is growing. I'm pretty sure most of those are Ordinal spammers like this one, paying 23 sat/vbyte and abusing ViaBTC's free transaction accelerator with a bot to get their spam confirmed.

The good news is: it looks like Ordinal spammers are no longer willing to pay the highest transaction fees. At least that's something.
The bad news is: somehow they're still earning money from spamming their scam with millions of transactions.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 896
I thought the same in 2017 Wink

I hardly knew about Bitcoin in 2017  Tongue

60 sats/vB is definetely a lot in absolute terms, but for the current period it isn't that big. I mean, I had a payment I needed to make, so I combined 3 UTXOs setting the fee rate at 60 because I didn't know if I would have this chance again in the near future.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
But how do you both know that the fees will drop?
We don't. But I've seen it go up and down often enough to expect it again at some point.

Quote
I really don't think fees will drop.
I thought the same in 2017 Wink
Pages:
Jump to: