Avalon ASIC users thread - page 132.

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2013, 09:03:14 AM

Quote from: -ck on July 06, 2013, 08:57:15 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2013, 08:19:08 AM

just checked my freq after 15h of continuous uptime.

i've got settings of --avalon -auto --avalon -temp 40 and i have 325 set in default box above. according to con the latter shouldn't matter.

problem is that hashrate is averaging only about 70 Mh/sec. i thought it was supposed to go as high as 80-85?

edit: and freq are btwn 285-305

It's going to really struggle to keep it at 40 degrees. That's probably why.

well, if that's the case then i'm going to try this: --avalon-auto --avalon-freq 350-375 --avalon-temp 40

i don't care about killing the fans. they can be replaced. i want to get the freq and resulting HR up (w/o killing the chips of course Tongue

)

after 24 min, so far so good:

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: -ck on July 06, 2013, 08:57:15 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2013, 08:19:08 AM

just checked my freq after 15h of continuous uptime.

i've got settings of --avalon -auto --avalon -temp 40 and i have 325 set in default box above. according to con the latter shouldn't matter.

problem is that hashrate is averaging only about 70 Mh/sec. i thought it was supposed to go as high as 80-85?

edit: and freq are btwn 285-305

It's going to really struggle to keep it at 40 degrees. That's probably why.

well, if that's the case then i'm going to try this: --avalon-auto --avalon-freq 350-375 --avalon-temp 40

i don't care about killing the fans. they can be replaced. i want to get the freq and resulting HR up (w/o killing the chips of course Tongue

)

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2013, 08:19:08 AM

just checked my freq after 15h of continuous uptime.

i've got settings of --avalon -auto --avalon -temp 40 and i have 325 set in default box above. according to con the latter shouldn't matter.

problem is that hashrate is averaging only about 70 Mh/sec. i thought it was supposed to go as high as 80-85?

edit: and freq are btwn 285-305

It's going to really struggle to keep it at 40 degrees. That's probably why.

elasticband

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom

can i ask what acceptable HW error rates are?
All my machines are running the 20130519b firmware, 2 of my machines i have set on 355mhz and they are getting around 1.6% - 1.8% HW if i do the equation HW x 100 / diff1shares(+HW), these 2 machines have been runnning around 84gh steadily.

My other 3 machines i have set on 345mhz and they get around 0.5-07% errors and they run at around 82ghs

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: BenTuras on July 06, 2013, 08:27:54 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2013, 08:19:08 AM

just checked my freq after 15h of continuous uptime.

i've got settings of --avalon -auto --avalon -temp 40 and i have 325 set in default box above. according to con the latter shouldn't matter.

problem is that hashrate is averaging only about 70 G Mh/sec. i thought it was supposed to go as high as 80-85?

edit: and freq are btwn 285-305

Set the temp to 50 and try again. Could take a while before it starts increasing the freq. You can set the starting freq if you like.
You are also giving it confusing arguments: Starting freq 325, and maintain freq between 285-305. Starting freq is ok, set freq range to 275-350 and try again.

maybe i wasn't clear.

con specifically said that it shouldn't matter what figure you insert into the "Chip Frequency(Default: 300)" box. i just happened to have 325 in there over the last 15h. the result is actual frequencies of 3 avalons btwn 285-305. i would've thought that would be enough time for the auto setting to have ramped those to around 350.

having said all that, i just went ahead and changed the 325 to 350 and already i've moved up to close to 80 Mh/s with freq of around 330. maybe the default setting does matter?

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2013, 08:19:08 AM

just checked my freq after 15h of continuous uptime.

i've got settings of --avalon -auto --avalon -temp 40 and i have 325 set in default box above. according to con the latter shouldn't matter.

problem is that hashrate is averaging only about 70 G Mh/sec. i thought it was supposed to go as high as 80-85?

edit: and freq are btwn 285-305

Set the temp to 50 and try again. Could take a while before it starts increasing the freq. You can set the starting freq if you like.
You are also giving it confusing arguments: Starting freq 325, and maintain freq between 285-305. Starting freq is ok, set freq range to 275-350 and try again.

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

just checked my freq after 15h of continuous uptime.

i've got settings of --avalon -auto --avalon -temp 40 and i have 325 set in default box above. according to con the latter shouldn't matter.

problem is that hashrate is averaging only about 70 Mh/sec. i thought it was supposed to go as high as 80-85?

edit: and freq are btwn 285-305

bitdude

sr. member

Activity: 277

Merit: 254

i'm trying bitminter

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: area on July 06, 2013, 04:44:42 AM

So which pools are people using for their Avalons?

i've used ozcoin and slush.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: fpgaminer on July 06, 2013, 03:34:05 AM

ckolivas, thank you for all of your hard work! I had a question about your latest Avalon firmware (20130703). I upgraded one of my Avalons to it tonight (was running ~20130624 at the time). I noticed that suddenly the numbers reported under MHS5s lost a lot of variance. This is a graph of MHS5s over time:

8pm is when I upgraded the unit to 20130703. You can see that it suddenly quieted down quite a bit. Before and after the upgrade I was using a constant clock frequency (345).

I'm curious, did you change any of the code related to that particular statistic?

Well spotted. I fixed the hashrate meter for 5s so it really is a true exponentially decaying 5s average now. The old hashmeter was a little more "imaginitive".

Just as an aside, I am currently touring through Europe for the next 6 weeks. So while I will have generous internet access at times to answer questions, there is close to zero chance of me creating new firmware, especially since my main development machine with build environments and so on decided to fail about 1 hour before I left home and I just left it off in disgust. So please keep your requests on hold till then.

area

full member

Activity: 177

Merit: 100

So which pools are people using for their Avalons?

GenTarkin

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 1002

if I had to guess, yes its lower variance, which means its probably a good thing... means more effecient hashing / comms .. etc.. but thats just my guess =)

fpgaminer

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 517

ckolivas, thank you for all of your hard work! I had a question about your latest Avalon firmware (20130703). I upgraded one of my Avalons to it tonight (was running ~20130624 at the time). I noticed that suddenly the numbers reported under MHS5s lost a lot of variance. This is a graph of MHS5s over time:

8pm is when I upgraded the unit to 20130703. You can see that it suddenly quieted down quite a bit. Before and after the upgrade I was using a constant clock frequency (345).

I'm curious, did you change any of the code related to that particular statistic?

el_rlee

legendary

Activity: 1600

Merit: 1014

Quote from: NiteShdw on July 06, 2013, 02:14:47 AM

I have 3 Avalons and I'm working on putting in a dedicated circuit in the basement for them. At an estimated 2100 watts at 110v (USA), I'm looking at 19A, which just pushes the limits of standard 20A breakers, with no room for future expansion.

What I've been thinking is that I can wire up an outlet at 220v, get slightly better power efficiency, and reduce my amps to about 10A, leaving plenty of room for future boxes.

Can anyone advise on a proper wiring diagram for 220v that's compatible with the 3-pin input on the Avalon PSUs?

As of right now, my understanding is that I'd wire black and white both to hot (on a dual-pole 20A breaker) and ground to ground, with no neutral. I should get 220v with the two hots as the breaker pulls in 110 and -110 for the two hots. I know I would need to get the correct outlets for 220v also as well as adapters or proper 220v PSU cables.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_60320 . The biggest and longest pin is PE.

NiteShdw

member

Activity: 69

Merit: 10

I have 3 Avalons and I'm working on putting in a dedicated circuit in the basement for them. At an estimated 2100 watts at 110v (USA), I'm looking at 19A, which just pushes the limits of standard 20A breakers, with no room for future expansion.

What I've been thinking is that I can wire up an outlet at 220v, get slightly better power efficiency, and reduce my amps to about 10A, leaving plenty of room for future boxes.

Can anyone advise on a proper wiring diagram for 220v that's compatible with the 3-pin input on the Avalon PSUs?

As of right now, my understanding is that I'd wire black and white both to hot (on a dual-pole 20A breaker) and ground to ground, with no neutral. I should get 220v with the two hots as the breaker pulls in 110 and -110 for the two hots. I know I would need to get the correct outlets for 220v also as well as adapters or proper 220v PSU cables.

el_rlee

legendary

Activity: 1600

Merit: 1014

Quote from: GenTarkin on July 06, 2013, 01:50:56 AM

where did you get the watercooling? is there a setup released for avy yet?

in my sig

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: el_rlee on July 06, 2013, 01:42:16 AM

Increased the water temperatur and frequency a bit... HW error now 1.3%

Still the frequency doesn't move by itself.

Quote from: area on July 06, 2013, 01:21:58 AM

With such a high hashrate over Stratum, what's a normal accepted / rejected ratio for a pool? I seem to be running below 90% which seems bad...

I don't know - but I am on the other end of the world and slush's pool is working fine for me...

Yeah. I've been noticing that too.

Frequency hasn't been changing on auto.

NiteShdw

member

Activity: 69

Merit: 10

Quote from: area on July 06, 2013, 01:49:53 AM

Quote from: el_rlee on July 06, 2013, 01:42:16 AM

Quote from: area on July 06, 2013, 01:21:58 AM

With such a high hashrate over Stratum, what's a normal accepted / rejected ratio for a pool? I seem to be running below 90% which seems bad...

I don't know - but I am on the other end of the world and slush's pool is working fine for me...

Switching from eustratum on OzCoin to 'regular' stratum seems to have much better numbers coming out now. Which is odd, because eustratum should definitely be closer.

On Ozcoin, I was getting really bad efficiency ratings until I switched from the default to the US URL. Now I'm getting 99.5% on average. Network latency will kill you at these hash rates.

GenTarkin

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 1002

where did you get the watercooling? is there a setup released for avy yet?

area

full member

Activity: 177

Merit: 100

Quote from: el_rlee on July 06, 2013, 01:42:16 AM

Quote from: area on July 06, 2013, 01:21:58 AM

With such a high hashrate over Stratum, what's a normal accepted / rejected ratio for a pool? I seem to be running below 90% which seems bad...

I don't know - but I am on the other end of the world and slush's pool is working fine for me...

Switching from eustratum on OzCoin to 'regular' stratum seems to have much better numbers coming out now. Which is odd, because eustratum should definitely be closer.

Topic: Avalon ASIC users thread - page 132. (Read 438596 times)