[Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 179.

zloyneo

newbie

Activity: 40

Merit: 0

Quote from: patrike on April 23, 2019, 04:35:49 AM

Awesome Miner version 6.3.3

Features
- New trigger for device hashrate
- Bulk edit of External Miner properties: SSH port and SSH credentials
- Bulk edit of Managed Miner properties: Autostart miner
Integration
- Add additional block explorers for wallet balance
- Add additional pools for Mining Dutch
User interface
- Menu of available rule triggers rearranged into groups to make it easier to find triggers
Version notes
- Improved logging for the Dynamic Update feature of coin properties
Mining softare
- SrbMiner 1.8.5
- TeamRedMiner 0.4.4
- lolMiner 0.8.1
- WildRig Miner 0.15.5
Corrections
- Correction to the Change Pool Group operation to ensure correct pool priority for ASIC miners
- Correction to the password parameter name for the Phoenix Miner pool configuration file

Good afternoon. how to implement the ability to change with one click: pool, manner, coins, acceleration for one Riga and for a group of rigs. How to tie the acceleration to a specific Riga and its dependence on the algorithm or coin.

nordmann666

member

Activity: 363

Merit: 16

how to use new SRB Miner with that tweaking Feature?
I have to start the srb .exe as admin - but i cant through Awesome Miner

trucobit

jr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 2

Quote from: patrike on April 23, 2019, 04:35:49 AM

Awesome Miner version 6.3.3

Features
- New trigger for device hashrate
- Bulk edit of External Miner properties: SSH port and SSH credentials
- Bulk edit of Managed Miner properties: Autostart miner
Integration
- Add additional block explorers for wallet balance
- Add additional pools for Mining Dutch
User interface
- Menu of available rule triggers rearranged into groups to make it easier to find triggers
Version notes
- Improved logging for the Dynamic Update feature of coin properties
Mining softare
- SrbMiner 1.8.5
- TeamRedMiner 0.4.4
- lolMiner 0.8.1
- WildRig Miner 0.15.5
Corrections
- Correction to the Change Pool Group operation to ensure correct pool priority for ASIC miners
- Correction to the password parameter name for the Phoenix Miner pool configuration file

Good update It could be added in Notifications, when an API fails ?, as we now use dozens of apis to configure the currencies, it is very interesting to be able to monitor those apis that have not been able to collect data, in this way have under control the large amount of apis that we are using, and that otherwise it would be impossible to monitor, and I think the notification tab would be very good.

Currency X api Difficulty problem
Currency X Api Nethash Problem

Something like that. For example, when it happens 2 or 3 times in a row, you do not need to notify the first one that it fails.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Awesome Miner version 6.3.3

Features
- New trigger for device hashrate
- Bulk edit of External Miner properties: SSH port and SSH credentials
- Bulk edit of Managed Miner properties: Autostart miner
Integration
- Add additional block explorers for wallet balance
- Add additional pools for Mining Dutch
User interface
- Menu of available rule triggers rearranged into groups to make it easier to find triggers
Version notes
- Improved logging for the Dynamic Update feature of coin properties
Mining softare
- SrbMiner 1.8.5
- TeamRedMiner 0.4.4
- lolMiner 0.8.1
- WildRig Miner 0.15.5
Corrections
- Correction to the Change Pool Group operation to ensure correct pool priority for ASIC miners
- Correction to the password parameter name for the Phoenix Miner pool configuration file

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: trucobit on April 22, 2019, 05:16:19 AM

Quote from: patrike on April 21, 2019, 12:07:18 PM

Quote from: Siolim on April 21, 2019, 04:17:48 AM

Quote from: trucobit on April 20, 2019, 08:06:24 PM

Quote from: Siolim on April 20, 2019, 05:30:07 PM

Hello, Patricke.

I noticed that when creating an API request for determining complexity, etc., the response does not recognize the name of the site of three words.

For example, https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty.

try https://ravencoin.network/api/status?q=getDifficulty Json proof-of-work

Thank you friend.

But sites where in the title are three words
I have more.

When I open https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty in a web browser I do see the Cloud Flare protection page the first time I launch it. It basically indicates that they only allows web browser that can solve a Javascript challenge are allowed to move on to the actual page. Cloud Flare protected sites cannot be accessed as an API from applications like Awesome Miner that only load data without being a complete web browser.

There might be some solution to this, but not an easy one that I get in place right away.

Delay 5 seconds and follow the redirection of cloudflare, which will be a 301,302 or 303

It's unfortunately not that easy, as this is exactly what CloudFlare prevents you from doing unless you are a web browser that can compute their challenge with a Javascript engine. If you only try to download the content, you don't get any redirect to follow.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: BestBitcoinOdds on April 21, 2019, 02:35:36 PM

Can anyone help me out?
Some of my miners have restricted api access and others have privileged. I've followed these instructions "Awesome Miner will automatically configure the Managed Miners to use Privileged mode by default. These settings can be changed from the Advanced section of the miner properties in the Awesome Miner Options dialog." But I can't see where to change it?

What ASIC miners are you running? For most Antminers, Awesome Miner can setup this automatically:
https://support.awesomeminer.com/support/solutions/articles/35000085989-configure-privileged-api-access-for-antminer
Use the toolbar Tools -> Antminer&ASIC -> Configure API access.

This will unfortunately not work on the latest Antminer S15/T15 where no SSH access is available and no other known way of setting Privileged API access are available.

razerf

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Quote from: slysir on April 22, 2019, 08:29:51 AM

TPLink Energy Monitor - free tool

A web based monitoring dashboard displaying energy usage data and statistics for TP-Link HS110 smart plugs.

Automatically scans for TP-Link smart plug devices on your local network on server start.
Realtime current, voltage, power readings.
Recent power usage trend chart.
Configurable power usage history logger.
Plug on/off state and uptime.
Daily & monthly energy usage totals and averages.
Historical daily and monthly energy usage charts.

https://github.com/jamesbarnett91/tplink-energy-monitor

https://i.imgur.com/DdsLefc.png

Or kasa on android...

slysir

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

TPLink Energy Monitor - free tool

A web based monitoring dashboard displaying energy usage data and statistics for TP-Link HS110 smart plugs.

Automatically scans for TP-Link smart plug devices on your local network on server start.
Realtime current, voltage, power readings.
Recent power usage trend chart.
Configurable power usage history logger.
Plug on/off state and uptime.
Daily & monthly energy usage totals and averages.
Historical daily and monthly energy usage charts.

https://github.com/jamesbarnett91/tplink-energy-monitor

https://i.imgur.com/DdsLefc.png

trucobit

jr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 2

Quote from: patrike on April 21, 2019, 12:07:18 PM

Quote from: Siolim on April 21, 2019, 04:17:48 AM

Quote from: trucobit on April 20, 2019, 08:06:24 PM

Quote from: Siolim on April 20, 2019, 05:30:07 PM

Hello, Patricke.

I noticed that when creating an API request for determining complexity, etc., the response does not recognize the name of the site of three words.

For example, https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty.

try https://ravencoin.network/api/status?q=getDifficulty Json proof-of-work

Thank you friend.

But sites where in the title are three words
I have more.

When I open https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty in a web browser I do see the Cloud Flare protection page the first time I launch it. It basically indicates that they only allows web browser that can solve a Javascript challenge are allowed to move on to the actual page. Cloud Flare protected sites cannot be accessed as an API from applications like Awesome Miner that only load data without being a complete web browser.

There might be some solution to this, but not an easy one that I get in place right away.

Delay 5 seconds and follow the redirection of cloudflare, which will be a 301,302 or 303

trucobit

jr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 2

Quote from: patrike on April 21, 2019, 11:50:58 AM

Quote from: trucobit on April 19, 2019, 10:09:23 PM

@PArike I send you a small problem or discrepancy, it's very strange.

Currency PHL using your exponential formula gives a more or less close value, but it is dominated by auto exchanges and it does not work for me, but good. But when I choose the complete formula, I mean nethash, blocktime, reward ...... The result changes an awful lot to worse. I have checked the data several times, can not give a result that is 1/3 of the result with the exponential formula. To see if something is wrong, I think the blocking time may be wrong in the formula, or it is simply something else. I leave you the full currency data so you can configure it.

PHL X16r block reward 2.5 Blocktime 150 seconds

Difficulty
http://explore.placeh.io:8080/ext/summary token json data.[0].difficulty

Price

https://api.crex24.com/v2/public/tickers?instrument=PHL-BTC token json [?(@.instrument=='PHL-BTC')].bid

Nethash

http://explore.placeh.io:8080/api/getnetworkhashps

With the exponential formula in the same machine 0.0014 6x 1080ti, with the complete formula 0.0058 the difference is huge, I do not understand it, it should not be like that, something fails.

I have done the measurement with exponential and the correct profit would be 1.25 but only when the auto exchanges (zpool, zergpool etc ...) do not give war.

It's not a coin I'm going to use, but this huge difference has caught my attention that something is not right. The formula with all the data can not be so far away. Somehow I do not trust the blocktime that is 150 seconds 2.5 minutes, but it is not a non-metric value.

I await your conclusions.

First a general answer. The formula for calculating coins per day using Difficulty-Reward-ExpFactor works for almost all coins and the formula using NetHash works for many coins as well. There will however always be coins with some unique properties where either one or none of these formulas can predict the number of coins per day. That's not an indication that the formulas are wrong, just that they may not be usable in a few cases.

Coins based on CuckaRoo29 / CuckaToo31 / CuckooCycle coins are examples where you never will get any correct values out of the formulas.

I just wanted to highlight this in general as I assume you will play around with quite a number of coins to do these calculations, and eventually you will find coins where they do something unique and the numbers will look strange.

In this case I entered the sources of information as you did, and from what I can see the Difficulty and NetHash forumula gives almost the same result. It was only 1 - 2 percent difference between them. However, in my case I used Block Time 60 seconds (1 minute) as this is what both CoinCalculators.io and CoinToMine reports. If you entered Block Time 150 seconds, it probably explain the difference you got.

Well, if you are right Patrike, it is 60 seconds, the person in charge of adding data in the online excel, did not do well, I and another measured the coins, yesterday the average exponential, today I will do with the complete formula . I do not know why they gave me 150 seconds.

If I am aware that the complete formula is not valid for all, but if more than 90% of the coins or 95%. I know there are some very special coins that the complete formula is not worth, as you say for example Grin, that both CC and CTM gave very different values. KARL de CTM changed numbers to make it fit, even so, I had to change its PRofit in its day to 2.1 to get closer to reality.

It's been our fault so I'm sorry. A bad data in a moment has someone. I still like the complete formula, getting the data from the coolest sites, because in the auto swtich profit mode, you enter the currency much earlier, and those who use CC or CTM will always be late with cached data.

Siolim

newbie

Activity: 107

Merit: 0

Quote from: patrike on April 21, 2019, 12:07:18 PM

Quote from: Siolim on April 21, 2019, 04:17:48 AM

Quote from: trucobit on April 20, 2019, 08:06:24 PM

Quote from: Siolim on April 20, 2019, 05:30:07 PM

Hello, Patricke.

I noticed that when creating an API request for determining complexity, etc., the response does not recognize the name of the site of three words.

For example, https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty.

try https://ravencoin.network/api/status?q=getDifficulty Json proof-of-work

Thank you friend.

But sites where in the title are three words
I have more.

When I open https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty in a web browser I do see the Cloud Flare protection page the first time I launch it. It basically indicates that they only allows web browser that can solve a Javascript challenge are allowed to move on to the actual page. Cloud Flare protected sites cannot be accessed as an API from applications like Awesome Miner that only load data without being a complete web browser.

There might be some solution to this, but not an easy one that I get in place right away.

I thought the problem is json. Thank you, now everything is clear.

House Xylander

jr. member

Activity: 97

Merit: 5

Quote from: patrike on April 21, 2019, 11:54:43 AM

Quote from: House Xylander on April 20, 2019, 01:01:51 AM

Quote from: patrike on April 19, 2019, 03:46:36 PM

Quote from: House Xylander on April 18, 2019, 11:09:05 PM

What would be the best way to adjust the Algorithms section for equihash and Decred when you add DR5s & Z11s.

I already have it set for myDR3s & z9 minis.

Can you please describe this request/question in a bit more detail? I understand that you are about to add your new Antminers, but what are the configuration or operation you want to do here?

the current custom setting in the algorithm section for my Z9 minis is 10k/s @ 268w. When I added my Z11s they were showing 135k/s @ 4000w on the Main->Miners tab.

Thanks for the update. These two miners have quite a different efficiency you noticed. For this reason, the linear power usage scaling in the Profit Profile will not make good predictions.

Please go to the Options dialog, Profit Profile section and add a new profile for the Z11 miners. In this profile, you can enter a typical hashrate and power usage for the Z11, in the same way, to did in your previous profile for the Z9 miner. Finally, you can open the Properties of your External Miners representing the Z11 miners and select the new profit profile you created.

Thank you very much for the detailed explanation.

BestBitcoinOdds

member

Activity: 152

Merit: 30

Can anyone help me out?
Some of my miners have restricted api access and others have privileged. I've followed these instructions "Awesome Miner will automatically configure the Managed Miners to use Privileged mode by default. These settings can be changed from the Advanced section of the miner properties in the Awesome Miner Options dialog." But I can't see where to change it?

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: fgm on April 21, 2019, 07:03:10 AM

@patrike please implement memory voltage in awesome miner overclocking.
On AMD cards the core voltage is a combination of cvddc + mvddc, if you do not set both at the same value core clock voltage is not applied correctly

Images are on imgur

https://imgur.com/a/vFggb6l

Thanks for the suggestion. There will be some additional properties added to the native overclocking feature over the next few weeks so I will try to include this one as well.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: Siolim on April 21, 2019, 04:17:48 AM

Quote from: trucobit on April 20, 2019, 08:06:24 PM

Quote from: Siolim on April 20, 2019, 05:30:07 PM

Hello, Patricke.

I noticed that when creating an API request for determining complexity, etc., the response does not recognize the name of the site of three words.

For example, https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty.

try https://ravencoin.network/api/status?q=getDifficulty Json proof-of-work

Thank you friend.

But sites where in the title are three words
I have more.

When I open https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty in a web browser I do see the Cloud Flare protection page the first time I launch it. It basically indicates that they only allows web browser that can solve a Javascript challenge are allowed to move on to the actual page. Cloud Flare protected sites cannot be accessed as an API from applications like Awesome Miner that only load data without being a complete web browser.

There might be some solution to this, but not an easy one that I get in place right away.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: trucobit on April 20, 2019, 08:53:49 AM

https://www.dropbox.com/s/397zu7whoj1s93u/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-20%20a%20las%2015.46.06.png?dl=0

This is happening to me in several currencies, both with supplier data and with personalized data, that remain at 0 of profit. I have tried many times already, and it is not just one currency they are several. You will see that all the data is added, it is impossible that with all the data the profit is 0 and I have measured the AL-GO to have reference

We also use the getnetworkhashps command a lot to get nethash but it depends on which currency, it gives us errors, the data is good on the form, but then the coin drops a lot, if I put it with the exponential formula which does not require this data , go back up But something is failing, as Moppidoo commented, he uses getinfo that we are not used to. I hope you have an easy solution because it is a small stone in the road.

Do you get the same issue even if you uncheck "Change properties" for this coin, to only use default values?

Can you please check that you don't have any pool for this coin where you have set the Profit Factor to 0 for the pool. As you remember, this will affect the revenue of the coin if you have enabled "Apply pool profit factor in the Coins tab" in the Options dialog, Statistics Settings.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: House Xylander on April 20, 2019, 01:01:51 AM

Quote from: patrike on April 19, 2019, 03:46:36 PM

Quote from: House Xylander on April 18, 2019, 11:09:05 PM

What would be the best way to adjust the Algorithms section for equihash and Decred when you add DR5s & Z11s.

I already have it set for myDR3s & z9 minis.

Can you please describe this request/question in a bit more detail? I understand that you are about to add your new Antminers, but what are the configuration or operation you want to do here?

the current custom setting in the algorithm section for my Z9 minis is 10k/s @ 268w. When I added my Z11s they were showing 135k/s @ 4000w on the Main->Miners tab.

Thanks for the update. These two miners have quite different efficiency you noticed. For this reason, the linear power usage scaling in the Profit Profile will not make good predictions.

Please go to the Options dialog, Profit Profile section and add a new profile for the Z11 miners. In this profile you can enter a typical hashrate and power usage for the Z11 in the same way to did in your previous profile for the Z9 miner. Finally you can open the Properties of your External Miners representing the Z11 miners and select the new profit profile you created.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: trucobit on April 19, 2019, 10:09:23 PM

@PArike I send you a small problem or discrepancy, it's very strange.

Currency PHL using your exponential formula gives a more or less close value, but it is dominated by auto exchanges and it does not work for me, but good. But when I choose the complete formula, I mean nethash, blocktime, reward ...... The result changes an awful lot to worse. I have checked the data several times, can not give a result that is 1/3 of the result with the exponential formula. To see if something is wrong, I think the blocking time may be wrong in the formula, or it is simply something else. I leave you the full currency data so you can configure it.

PHL X16r block reward 2.5 Blocktime 150 seconds

Difficulty
http://explore.placeh.io:8080/ext/summary token json data.[0].difficulty

Price

https://api.crex24.com/v2/public/tickers?instrument=PHL-BTC token json [?(@.instrument=='PHL-BTC')].bid

Nethash

http://explore.placeh.io:8080/api/getnetworkhashps

With the exponential formula in the same machine 0.0014 6x 1080ti, with the complete formula 0.0058 the difference is huge, I do not understand it, it should not be like that, something fails.

I have done the measurement with exponential and the correct profit would be 1.25 but only when the auto exchanges (zpool, zergpool etc ...) do not give war.

It's not a coin I'm going to use, but this huge difference has caught my attention that something is not right. The formula with all the data can not be so far away. Somehow I do not trust the blocktime that is 150 seconds 2.5 minutes, but it is not a non-metric value.

I await your conclusions.

First a general answer. The formula for calculating coins per day using Difficulty-Reward-ExpFactor works for almost all coins and the formula using NetHash works for many coins as well. There will however always be coins with some unique properties where either one or none of these formulas can predict the number of coins per day. That's not an indication that the formulas are wrong, just that they may not be usable in a few cases.

Coins based on CuckaRoo29 / CuckaToo31 / CuckooCycle coins are examples where you never will get any correct values out of the formulas.

I just wanted to highlight this in general as I assume you will play around with quite a number of coins to do these calculations, and eventually you will find coins where they do something unique and the numbers will look strange.

In this case I entered the sources of information as you did, and from what I can see the Difficulty and NetHash forumula gives almost the same result. It was only 1 - 2 percent difference between them. However, in my case I used Block Time 60 seconds (1 minute) as this is what both CoinCalculators.io and CoinToMine reports. If you entered Block Time 150 seconds, it probably explain the difference you got.

fgm

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

@patrike please implement memory voltage in awesome miner overclocking.
On AMD cards the core voltage is a combination of cvddc + mvddc, if you do not set both at the same value core clock voltage is not applied correctly

Images are on imgur

https://imgur.com/a/vFggb6l

trucobit

jr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 2

Quote from: Siolim on April 21, 2019, 04:17:48 AM

Quote from: trucobit on April 20, 2019, 08:06:24 PM

Quote from: Siolim on April 20, 2019, 05:30:07 PM

Hello, Patricke.

I noticed that when creating an API request for determining complexity, etc., the response does not recognize the name of the site of three words.

For example, https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty.

try https://ravencoin.network/api/status?q=getDifficulty Json proof-of-work

Thank you friend.

But sites where in the title are three words
I have more.

There is a mistake, and it will be corrected PAtrike as soon as possible. But for this specific problem of RVN I have given you the solution. I also have a problem that I have reported. Just wait, the insurance that reads your post and review the problem. Just give it time.

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 179. (Read 703146 times)