@patrike I do not want to be heavy but I remember.
It is urgent to be able to choose the Exchange for each currency. With this situation so bearish, result that there are many exchanges that have coins listed but have wallet blocked, some if not others
A very simple example. XVG is in Cryptobridge and is the price that AM gives me, but that price of 190, is very different from the one that gives Crex24 of 169 that there if the currency works.
It is happening to me more and more times and it is a tremendous pain to have to be juango with the profit. THE idea already know when defining the pool of the currency, also in a drop down to be able to choose the exchange among the available, if none is chosen, use the exchange that gets more money as it does right now
I would not insist, but I've been reporting it for a month now, and with this bear market it happens every time in many more HDAC, BTX, DNR, RVN currencies, and in others that I do not use continuously.
It is also because if there is little difference I should join more coins in the same exchange to avoid FEE transfers later. But mainly it is because they are mining at a not real price and I can not choose the exchange. It is not a difficult job but you will have your work hours to collect those exchanges and their prices and put the drop down in each pool.
I hope you are taking it more and more into account, because this is hurting me a lot and make me have to work more to see if it goes or not, if you pay less the other calculate a change of approximate profir that then in two days it is no longer valid etc ... I see it very necessary to incorporate it.
I'm sorry to be so insistent, but I live to 50% of the cryptomineria and I'm many hours with it.
exactly, this is happening even with bigger coins like BCH. This really is a must, small exchanges suffer from unreal P&D....
Hi Patrike,
Since this has been brought up a few times, I think a potential solution/workaround for this is maybe you can implement average/weighted price based on traded volume via the CoinCalculator's API, then apply the weighted factor to the bid/ask price, what do you think?
1) Specify exchange per coin.
Right now there isn't a general Exchange concept in Awesome Miner, so when you globally filter on the exchanges provided CoinCalculators, it's basically a string matching you do. If you specify a filter "CryptoBridge" it will match the exchange named "CryptoBridge" as part of the CoinCalculators data.
If CoinCalculators was the only coin source, it would be possible to implement a similar filter concept per Coin as well, allowing the user to enter "CryptoBridge" for a specific coin.
Soon you will have support for additional coin sources - CoinToMine will be added today for example. I've implemented a similar global filter for the exchanges for CoinToMine, but the exchange names provided by CoinToMine are different compared to CoinCalculators. You will for example have "Crypto-bridge.org" as an exchange instead of "CryptoBridge" as reported by CoinCalculators.io.
One workaround would be for the user to specify "CryptoBridge, Crypto-bridge.org" for as exchanges for a specific coin if you use multiple coin sources. Any future coin source provides might give this exchange yet another name, increasing the complexity.
Another solution would be to allow partial matching like "bridge", but that's not very predictable.
I'm open to suggestions here.
2) Weighted price based on volume.
This is also a good point, mainly for solving the issue if a single exchange with low volume presenting strange prices.
That problem that you pose in programming is very easy to solve, it is an ARRAY.
You specify
Coincalculator Cryptobridge = Cryptobridge
Cointomine Crypto-bridge = Cryptobridge
In other words, you put a name to each exchange, and in an array, you tell them the different names that are used, and you link the different names that the same exchange has in the different aggregators to the same name, with which we should only use one only list that you would do, and that would know how each exchange is called in each coin aggregator. This is a very common solution in progamacion. I am not a programmer but I have several websites and I direct 2 groups of web and BD programmers.
Anyway it would not be crazy to talk to soothaa to see if you can assign the extension code, since he does it differently, he reads through the price of the different Exchanges, but always shows the highest, and that is a mistake. Right now the only thing that fails in this extension is that the explorer inquidus has been updated and the scrape it does is not correct, it is a problem that is solved in 10 minutes.
I do not want to look exquisite asking for weird or supposedly weird things. But at some time in the future you will have to adapt it. Have the coins and their specifications of the WTM, CC aggregators etc ... but the prices read them one by one of the different exchanges. That way if you would have on the one hand the currency data (a-l-g-o, reward, hash, difficulty, explorer etc ...) and the prices would be obtained by scraping or scraping the exchanges through their apis. At that time to have the data separately you can specify the exchange currency, and not depend on the price that maximum WTM, coinwarz or whatever.
Right now I have the most profitable currencies coins that are wrong, because they have a fork, because they have an attack, or because they are dying and has the price of an exchange that no longer accepts it and the price is high. In the end, I work a lot in a great program like AM, it's a bit limited because I can not specify the exchange that works or the one I like for each currency.
So at the end I am working with 9 exchanges, and I would like to work with less, with 4 as much. And above all avoid the Exchanges that have a currency in the mainnet and raise the price, and just that price is the one that marks me AM, giving me an unreal value.
I only contribute ideas, just as important is the stability of the program and mining, as knowing that I am undermining the exact price of the exchanges that I want to work. Right now I have to settle for seeing the price that marks me and if I work with another exchange, I have to calculate more or less the profit difference, that changes every day, it's a big pain to work like that.
I do not ask for today, for tomorrow, for the next month, but it would be a very important update for 2019. I know that the program is not prepared to work in that way, but it is the most appropriate way for the miners, and later or early we will have to adapt it. I do not have to adapt myself to what the program says in question of price. I can not even work a currency if it is not in my exchanges that I use, but what I do know, that I want to mine the exact price of where I'm going to sell
Talk to Sootha who has done it and it would be a matter of adapting it to AM, I feel so insistent, of the few failures that there are, for me this is the most important. And if Sootha is going to let the extension die, you already have a lot of work done.
