@patrike I do not want to be heavy but I remember.
It is urgent to be able to choose the Exchange for each currency. With this situation so bearish, result that there are many exchanges that have coins listed but have wallet blocked, some if not others
A very simple example. XVG is in Cryptobridge and is the price that AM gives me, but that price of 190, is very different from the one that gives Crex24 of 169 that there if the currency works.
It is happening to me more and more times and it is a tremendous pain to have to be juango with the profit. THE idea already know when defining the pool of the currency, also in a drop down to be able to choose the exchange among the available, if none is chosen, use the exchange that gets more money as it does right now
I would not insist, but I've been reporting it for a month now, and with this bear market it happens every time in many more HDAC, BTX, DNR, RVN currencies, and in others that I do not use continuously.
It is also because if there is little difference I should join more coins in the same exchange to avoid FEE transfers later. But mainly it is because they are mining at a not real price and I can not choose the exchange. It is not a difficult job but you will have your work hours to collect those exchanges and their prices and put the drop down in each pool.
I hope you are taking it more and more into account, because this is hurting me a lot and make me have to work more to see if it goes or not, if you pay less the other calculate a change of approximate profir that then in two days it is no longer valid etc ... I see it very necessary to incorporate it.
I'm sorry to be so insistent, but I live to 50% of the cryptomineria and I'm many hours with it.
exactly, this is happening even with bigger coins like BCH. This really is a must, small exchanges suffer from unreal P&D....
Hi Patrike,
Since this has been brought up a few times, I think a potential solution/workaround for this is maybe you can implement average/weighted price based on traded volume via the CoinCalculator's API, then apply the weighted factor to the bid/ask price, what do you think?
1) Specify exchange per coin.
Right now there isn't a general Exchange concept in Awesome Miner, so when you globally filter on the exchanges provided CoinCalculators, it's basically a string matching you do. If you specify a filter "CryptoBridge" it will match the exchange named "CryptoBridge" as part of the CoinCalculators data.
If CoinCalculators was the only coin source, it would be possible to implement a similar filter concept per Coin as well, allowing the user to enter "CryptoBridge" for a specific coin.
Soon you will have support for additional coin sources - CoinToMine will be added today for example. I've implemented a similar global filter for the exchanges for CoinToMine, but the exchange names provided by CoinToMine are different compared to CoinCalculators. You will for example have "Crypto-bridge.org" as an exchange instead of "CryptoBridge" as reported by CoinCalculators.io.
One workaround would be for the user to specify "CryptoBridge, Crypto-bridge.org" for as exchanges for a specific coin if you use multiple coin sources. Any future coin source provides might give this exchange yet another name, increasing the complexity.
Another solution would be to allow partial matching like "bridge", but that's not very predictable.
I'm open to suggestions here.
2) Weighted price based on volume.
This is also a good point, mainly for solving the issue if a single exchange with low volume presenting strange prices.