Author

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 370. (Read 703143 times)

legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
Hi Patrike,

I was hoping this update might fix my previous issue with "some" rigs not showing revenue per day/month for Monero V7.

Let me be more specific:

Before the recent update, R9 380 and R9 390 Rigs using Claymore CryptoNight to mine Monero V7 showed $0.0 daily/monthly revenue.  However, RX 480 and RX 580 rigs using Cast XMR to mine Monero V7 showed daily/monthly revenue.

After the most recent update, I'm having the same issues except for one more ADDED issue.  The R9 380 and 390 rigs still show no daily/monthly revenue when using Claymore CryptoNight to mine MoneroV7.  But now they don't even show the Monero logo.  I did not think it would affect that issue if I upgraded each managed miner mining Monero V7 "with" Claymore CryptoNight but I did so anyway to see if that would fix it but no dice.

To be clear:  The rigs that ARE showing the MoneroV7 logo are using Cast XMR to mine Monero with RX 400 and 500 series rigs.  The rigs with NO MONERO LOGO at all are R9 series rigs using Claymore CryptoNight to mine MoneroV7.

Here is a link to a screenshot of the issue: https://i.imgur.com/C4AkyjH.jpg
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Hi, the more i used this tool, the more i am desesparate lol
I think i will give up.
A simple thing :
Launching miners and checking them remotely does work
Now, if i want to do managed miners, just one algo (i set up a template) to replicate the same settings , i put rules also to restart the miner, the miners will always stop for one reaoson or not, AMD or Nvidia, where they never stop when i run them without awesome miner...
Lossing so much time and energye and money...

Don't understand how a simple thing like that can't work properly
Tried the algo swithcing, and it is very rare that the tool will choose the correct algo...At the end, i just end up with Zec for Nvidia and ETH for AMD, sadly...Tought this tool could make some optomization, but it makes things worse.

Will check up other tool for monitoring, because i am really not convinced by any algo switching tool
Already when i was using MPH function for that, was very disappointed by the profit generated.

Now, unless spending time to find yourself the good coin to mine, and manage to sell fast, i don't see how this can make more money, just spend more time lol

newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
I Have just updated to 4.7.1 and all algorithms and softwares give me 50% rejected shares due to too low difficulty? What exactly happened on that update? And btw I also started having the "interface/service offline" issue on all miners.
Please start the miner with the Diagnostics button in the toolbar, making it possible for me to review the configuration and try the exact same on my system. Thanks!
Starting Diagnostics. Awesome Miner Remote Agent version: 4.7.1
Starting Mining Software
Setting up Miner Engine. Instance: 1
Engine Type: CcAlexisMiner, Auto Download: True, EnginePath: , Subtype: Disabled, CustomExecutable:
Added rule for: C:\Users\MSI-Z270-1\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\ccminer-alexis_1\ccminer-hsr-alexis-x86-cuda8\ccminer-alexis.exe
C:\Users\MSI-Z270-1\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\ccminer-alexis_1\ccminer-hsr-alexis-x86-cuda8\ccminer-alexis.exe  -a keccak -o stratum+tcp://keccak.mine.ahashpool.com:5133 -u 3ATJRszShHYWio4TdJYDDBMDHTu5hiY19F.Z270x1 -p c=BTC -b 0.0.0.0:4028   (WindowMode: ConsoleFormat, EngineType: CcAlexisMiner, IsProfitMiner: True)
Configuration:

Mining Engine Process started, PID: 8016

====================================================================================================
> *** ccminer alexis-hsr for nVidia GPUs from alexis78@github ***
> *** Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 8.0 (Not recommended prefer 7.5)
>
> *** Based on tpruvot@github ccminer
> *** Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
> *** Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.
>
> [2018-04-12 00:29:02] Starting on stratum+tcp://keccak.mine.ahashpool.com:5133
> [2018-04-12 00:29:02] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
> [2018-04-12 00:29:03] 6 miner threads started, using 'keccak' algorithm.
> [2018-04-12 00:29:04] Stratum difficulty set to 16 (0.06250)
> [2018-04-12 00:29:04] keccak block 2476473, diff 17802.628
> [2018-04-12 00:29:05] GPU#1: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
> [2018-04-12 00:29:05] GPU#5: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
> [2018-04-12 00:29:05] GPU#2: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
> [2018-04-12 00:29:05] GPU#3: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
> [2018-04-12 00:29:06] GPU#4: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
> [2018-04-12 00:29:06] [S/A/T]: 0/0/1, diff: 0.070, 331.23MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:06] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] GPU#0: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] [S/A/T]: 0/0/2, diff: 0.080, 484.80MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] [S/A/T]: 0/0/3, diff: 0.132, 979.40MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] reject reason: Duplicate share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] enabling duplicates check feature
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] [S/A/T]: 0/0/4, diff: 0.132, 979.40MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] [S/A/T]: 0/1/5, diff: 0.132, 979.40MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] [S/A/T]: 0/1/6, diff: 0.132, 979.40MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:07] [S/A/T]: 0/2/7, diff: 0.132, 979.40MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:08] [S/A/T]: 0/3/8, diff: 0.331, 1462.38MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:08] [S/A/T]: 0/4/9, diff: 0.118, 2104.50MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/5/10, diff: 0.065, 2208.40MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/6/11, diff: 0.065, 2208.40MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/7/12, diff: 0.065, 2208.40MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/8/13, diff: 0.065, 2208.40MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/8/14, diff: 0.065, 2208.40MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/8/15, diff: 0.065, 2208.40MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/8/16, diff: 0.065, 2208.40MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/9/17, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/10/18, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/10/19, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/10/20, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] [S/A/T]: 0/10/21, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:09] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] [S/A/T]: 0/10/22, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] [S/A/T]: 0/10/23, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] [S/A/T]: 0/10/24, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] [S/A/T]: 0/11/25, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] [S/A/T]: 0/12/26, diff: 0.290, 2360.31MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] [S/A/T]: 0/12/27, diff: 0.071, 2401.98MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:10] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/12/28, diff: 0.129, 2498.94MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/13/29, diff: 0.703, 2546.98MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/14/30, diff: 0.703, 2546.98MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/15/31, diff: 0.703, 2546.98MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/15/32, diff: 0.703, 2546.98MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/16/33, diff: 0.703, 2546.98MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/16/34, diff: 0.703, 2546.98MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/17/35, diff: 0.703, 2546.98MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/17/36, diff: 0.703, 2547.00MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/18/37, diff: 0.703, 2547.00MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/19/38, diff: 0.703, 2547.00MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/20/39, diff: 0.703, 2547.00MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:11] [S/A/T]: 0/21/40, diff: 0.703, 2547.00MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:12] [S/A/T]: 0/22/41, diff: 1.694, 2568.49MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:12] [S/A/T]: 0/23/42, diff: 0.140, 2597.21MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:12] [S/A/T]: 0/24/43, diff: 0.140, 2597.21MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:12] [S/A/T]: 0/25/44, diff: 0.140, 2597.21MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/26/45, diff: 0.068, 2630.71MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/27/46, diff: 0.068, 2630.71MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/27/47, diff: 0.233, 2637.38MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/28/48, diff: 0.233, 2637.38MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/29/49, diff: 0.233, 2637.38MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/29/50, diff: 0.233, 2637.38MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/30/51, diff: 0.233, 2637.38MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/30/52, diff: 0.233, 2637.38MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/30/53, diff: 0.233, 2637.38MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/31/54, diff: 0.077, 2655.71MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/32/55, diff: 0.077, 2655.71MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] [S/A/T]: 0/32/56, diff: 0.077, 2655.71MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:13] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/32/57, diff: 0.151, 2670.45MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/32/58, diff: 0.151, 2670.45MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/33/59, diff: 0.151, 2670.45MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/33/60, diff: 0.151, 2670.45MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/33/61, diff: 0.151, 2670.45MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/34/62, diff: 0.089, 2679.91MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/35/63, diff: 0.089, 2679.91MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/36/64, diff: 0.089, 2679.91MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/36/65, diff: 0.089, 2679.91MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/36/66, diff: 0.089, 2679.91MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/37/67, diff: 0.089, 2679.91MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] [S/A/T]: 0/37/68, diff: 0.089, 2679.91MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:14] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] [S/A/T]: 0/38/69, diff: 0.114, 2679.90MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] [S/A/T]: 0/38/70, diff: 0.114, 2679.90MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] [S/A/T]: 0/38/71, diff: 0.114, 2679.90MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] [S/A/T]: 0/38/72, diff: 0.114, 2679.90MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] [S/A/T]: 0/38/73, diff: 1.598, 2691.93MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:15] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/38/74, diff: 0.226, 2702.11MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/39/75, diff: 0.226, 2702.11MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/39/76, diff: 0.226, 2702.11MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/39/77, diff: 0.071, 2713.69MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/39/78, diff: 0.071, 2713.69MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/39/79, diff: 0.071, 2713.69MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/39/80, diff: 0.071, 2713.69MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/40/81, diff: 0.071, 2713.69MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/41/82, diff: 0.071, 2713.69MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/42/83, diff: 0.198, 2713.68MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/43/84, diff: 0.198, 2713.68MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/44/85, diff: 0.198, 2713.68MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/45/86, diff: 0.198, 2713.68MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/45/87, diff: 0.198, 2713.68MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/45/88, diff: 0.198, 2713.68MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/46/89, diff: 0.198, 2713.68MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] [S/A/T]: 0/46/90, diff: 0.198, 2713.68MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:16] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:17] [S/A/T]: 0/47/91, diff: 0.529, 2721.53MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:17] [S/A/T]: 0/48/92, diff: 0.123, 2728.22MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:17] [S/A/T]: 0/49/93, diff: 0.123, 2728.22MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:17] [S/A/T]: 0/49/94, diff: 0.123, 2728.22MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:17] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:17] [S/A/T]: 0/50/95, diff: 0.123, 2728.22MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:17] Pool asked your stats
> [2018-04-12 00:29:17] [S/A/T]: 0/51/96, diff: 0.123, 2728.22MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/51/97, diff: 0.199, 2732.23MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/52/98, diff: 0.199, 2732.23MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/52/99, diff: 0.199, 2732.23MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/53/100, diff: 0.199, 2732.23MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/54/101, diff: 0.199, 2732.23MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/54/102, diff: 0.199, 2732.23MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/54/103, diff: 0.199, 2732.23MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/55/104, diff: 1.188, 2733.34MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:18] [S/A/T]: 0/56/105, diff: 1.188, 2733.34MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/57/106, diff: 0.242, 2738.93MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/58/107, diff: 0.242, 2738.93MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/58/108, diff: 0.242, 2738.93MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/59/109, diff: 0.142, 2742.50MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/60/110, diff: 0.142, 2742.50MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/61/111, diff: 0.142, 2742.50MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/62/112, diff: 0.357, 2747.16MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/62/113, diff: 0.357, 2747.16MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/63/114, diff: 0.357, 2747.16MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/64/115, diff: 0.357, 2747.16MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] [S/A/T]: 0/64/116, diff: 0.357, 2747.16MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:19] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:20] [S/A/T]: 0/64/117, diff: 0.357, 2747.16MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:20] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:20] [S/A/T]: 0/65/118, diff: 0.357, 2747.16MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:20] [S/A/T]: 0/66/119, diff: 0.357, 2747.16MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:20] [S/A/T]: 0/67/120, diff: 0.718, 2751.53MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/68/121, diff: 0.079, 2756.26MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/69/122, diff: 0.079, 2756.26MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/70/123, diff: 0.079, 2756.26MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/71/124, diff: 0.167, 2760.27MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/71/125, diff: 0.167, 2760.27MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/71/126, diff: 0.167, 2760.27MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/71/127, diff: 0.248, 2760.95MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/71/128, diff: 0.248, 2760.95MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/71/129, diff: 0.248, 2760.95MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/72/130, diff: 0.248, 2760.95MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] [S/A/T]: 0/72/131, diff: 0.248, 2760.95MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:21] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:22] [S/A/T]: 0/72/132, diff: 3.505, 2763.01MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:22] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:22] [S/A/T]: 0/73/133, diff: 3.505, 2763.01MH/s yes!
> [2018-04-12 00:29:22] [S/A/T]: 0/73/134, diff: 3.505, 2763.01MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:22] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:22] [S/A/T]: 0/73/135, diff: 0.084, 2766.37MH/s booooo
> [2018-04-12 00:29:22] reject reason: Low difficulty share
> [2018-04-12 00:29:22] [S/A/T]: 0/74/136, diff: 0.084, 2766.37MH/s yes!

====================================================================================================
Stopping miner process ...
Prepare stopping Mining Software
Stopping Mining Software
Diagnostics completed
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
1.4 khs, i used the json from what to mine. Its reading fine on the miner page, but x1000 on coin page. Ok just spotted that. Thank you Smiley mhs was selected instead of khs Doh!

legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Awesome miner folk. Im getting high profit figures on the coin page with Sumokoin and MoneroV7. It seems a coma has been mistaken for a decimal place. e.g Sumokoin is showing £54,830.71 per month at the moment for 2 x rx570's lol, it should be reading £54.83 per month. Problem is its messing with the profit switching, and not switching to more profitable coins. Thank you in advance Smiley
I don't think Cryptonight-Heavy has any default hashrates defined. In your profit profile, what's your hashrate for Cryptonight-Heavy (Sumocoin) for example? It should be like one or a few kH/s I assume?
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
I Have just updated to 4.7.1 and all algorithms and softwares give me 50% rejected shares due to too low difficulty? What exactly happened on that update? And btw I also started having the "interface/service offline" issue on all miners.
Please start the miner with the Diagnostics button in the toolbar, making it possible for me to review the configuration and try the exact same on my system. Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
When I view profitability details on my dual Vega setup it's showing cryptonight v7 as 0.00 profit per day for MiningPoolHub which is definitely wrong. Something appears to be broken with the V7 handling.
I just noticed that MiningPoolHub changed their API's during the day for their reporting of Cryptonight / CryptonightV7. The naming of the algorithm in their API response has changed. I will have to see what these changes are about and adjust Awesome Miner to it.

Gotta love unannounced changes Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
When I view profitability details on my dual Vega setup it's showing cryptonight v7 as 0.00 profit per day for MiningPoolHub which is definitely wrong. Something appears to be broken with the V7 handling.
I just noticed that MiningPoolHub changed their API's during the day for their reporting of Cryptonight / CryptonightV7. The naming of the algorithm in their API response has changed. I will have to see what these changes are about and adjust Awesome Miner to it.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
I Have just updated to 4.7.1 and all algorithms and softwares give me 50% rejected shares due to too low difficulty? What exactly happened on that update? And btw I also started having the "interface/service offline" issue on all miners.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
When I view profitability details on my dual Vega setup it's showing cryptonight v7 as 0.00 profit per day for MiningPoolHub which is definitely wrong. Something appears to be broken with the V7 handling.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Hi Awesome miner folk. Im getting high profit figures on the coin page with Sumokoin and MoneroV7. It seems a coma has been mistaken for a decimal place. e.g Sumokoin is showing £54,830.71 per month at the moment for 2 x rx570's lol, it should be reading £54.83 per month. Problem is its messing with the profit switching, and not switching to more profitable coins. Thank you in advance Smiley
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Does anyone else have an issue with MiningDutch and the skein algorithm?

If I start Awesome Miner and I have all of my pools enabled in the profit switching menu, then Awesome Miner switches to Mining Dutch to mine the skein algo, it will instead start mining x11 (always the same, always x11).... and that is not profitable at all.... BUT, if I have only Mining Dutch selected in the profit switching menu, then start the miner, it mines skein normally with no problems.



The other problem that I have is that when I have all my pools enabled in the profit switching menu, AwesomeMiner will be mining the most profitable algo, and there will be no errors, no rejected shares, no hardware errors, but it will randomly just start mining the next most profitable algo in the list while the other algo is still the most profitable.

Also, when this happens, stopping the miner and restarting it will not make it start mining the top algo again... I have to completely close AwesomeMiner, and then it will start mining the most profitable algo again.


Does anyone else experience these issues, and what can I do to fix this?
1) Which of these pools are most profitable according to the View Details dialog (right click on the miner and select View Details)? The hashrates defined in the profit profile is what the profit switcher is looking at

2) I think you may not get any accepted shares for a period of time, and then Awesome Miner will mark the pool as "Failed" for this reason. You can disable this behavior in the Options dialog, Profit Switching section where you can uncheck "Ignore pools with no accepted shares".


Please keep an eye on this miner to make sure that it eventually starts to produce accepted shares.



1) I am using the nvidia profile (fully benchmarked and saved to profile) in my online services tab. When skein algo on Mining Dutch is most profitable.... It's because your software is telling me it is the most profitable. Clicking view details to see the most profitable gives me the same information as the online services tab.
The issue is that it's not actually mining skein like I said. (Unless I uncheck all pools in profit switching menu and only allow Mining Dutch)

At the very least, if there is no fix for me... Is there at least a way to disable just 1 specific algo for 1 specific pool??? If that is not possible, could you please add that in an update? I believe the ability to disable specific algos for specific pools would help a lot of people. I looked around but never found any option to do this.

2) Again, like I said.... AwesomeMiner will be mining the most profitable algo, and there will be no errors, no rejected shares, no hardware errors, but it will randomly just start mining the next most profitable algo in the list while the other algo is still the most profitable.


Could the shares just be taking too long? I have ignore pools with no accepted shares set to 5 minutes.  

EDIT: Yes I believe I had the setting "Ignore pools with no accepted shares (in minutes)" set too low. Setting this number higher or disabling it appears to keep miners mining when they are working harder for shares in certain cases. But this still does not explain why AwesomeMiner starts mining x11 on Mining Dutch when it is supposed to be mining skein.... and it is only with skein, like right now I have some rigs mining Nist5 on Mining Dutch, and none of them are having any issues and they are all mining the correct algo.

1) I assume you are using built-in Online Services, in this case, yes you can disable algo per pool just by Online Services -> Select one(s) you want to edit (multi select with shift/ctrl possible) and press Edit/Buik Edit -> Uncheck the Include in Managed Profit Switcher box, this part was pretty straight forward hence not easy to search for posts with similar issue

2) If you are having the problem of pools deactivated due to no accepted shares, check the port you are using, and read the getting started page @ Mining-Dutch on which port to use for your hardware. In fact, the default Online Services currently in AM v4.7 is probably using the wrong port for most hobby miners (9998 is High Diff on Skein Multiport at MD) hence you are not getting accepted shares fast enough. Just change the port to Vardiff and try again. since I believe you have quite capable HW, you might not need to use the Low Diff port.

***
PS, if you have no ASICs or ASICs for certain ASIC algos, I suggest you disable most of the ASIC algos since no point mining them with GPUs/CPUs, disable via 1) ....above.

***
PPS.
While you might be experienced miner, I guess you are relatively new to AM or Profit Switching. My suggestion is to test various online services and find out which one suits you and filter out the ones that doesn't. If you don't do Auto Exchange at all, I suggest you look away from the Built-In Yiimp pools and manually add only the ones you like to use via Pool Groups.


I appreciate the /r/ELI5 explanation of things, and yes you are correct, I am new to AM.

I have a mix of GPU rigs and ASIC units.

And yes I completely overlooked the actual online services menu part because I mainly thought it was for altering ports and such, not disabling the algos entirely... In hindsight it does make sense that I should have looked there to see if disabling specific algos was possible. (I mainly spend a lot of time looking at the online services tab not the menu part) So thanks for that bit of knowledge.

So for right now I am much happier with AM and because of your posts I am starting to look at AM issues as they are probably my lack of understanding of the finer points of the software itself...

But, I still believe that there is some unseen issue here for Mining Dutch with the skein algo.... Like I said, it is only Mining Dutch and only skein and only if I enable all my pools. If I simply disable all other pools then mining skein on Mining Dutch works just fine, but with all pools enabled, for some reason if skein on Mining Dutch becomes the most profitable, when the miner starts... it starts mining x11. And it's always x11, nothing else.

Anyway, thank you.
jr. member
Activity: 212
Merit: 6
For some reason i cant run benchmarks with enemy 1.05 with AM 4.7.1, it says "no URL supplied", enemey 1.04 does not show any errors, but same problem-not working. Last time i run benchmarks for ccminer-enemy 1.03 with AM 4.6 and it was fine.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0

***
PS, if you have no ASICs or ASICs for certain ASIC algos, I suggest you disable most of the ASIC algos since no point mining them with GPUs/CPUs, disable via 1) ....above.


Is there a way, or a list, to know wich ones are ASIC algos?
member
Activity: 277
Merit: 23
Actually i think i know what is the problem, XMR-STAK is listed as CN lago insted of CNv7, guess this is the reason why it doesn't calculate since AM probably thinks that measured hash rate is not for CNv7 algo
member
Activity: 277
Merit: 23
Why is Monero profitabilitly displayed as 0.000 ? I have external miner and the hash rate is properly calculated for Monero but it looks like AW can't get the value of monero (added json manualy still displays value 0)
You may have to manually select CryptonightV7->Monero, if it was selected as the coin Cryptonight->Monero before. I've already made a change in the new release that is about to be made available to remove any old entries of Cryptonight-Monero
I did that but still displays 0.0, funny thing is i know see the value of XMR it just doesn't calculate the profit...oh well on to install new version
jr. member
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
Does anyone else have an issue with MiningDutch and the skein algorithm?

If I start Awesome Miner and I have all of my pools enabled in the profit switching menu, then Awesome Miner switches to Mining Dutch to mine the skein algo, it will instead start mining x11 (always the same, always x11).... and that is not profitable at all.... BUT, if I have only Mining Dutch selected in the profit switching menu, then start the miner, it mines skein normally with no problems.



The other problem that I have is that when I have all my pools enabled in the profit switching menu, AwesomeMiner will be mining the most profitable algo, and there will be no errors, no rejected shares, no hardware errors, but it will randomly just start mining the next most profitable algo in the list while the other algo is still the most profitable.

Also, when this happens, stopping the miner and restarting it will not make it start mining the top algo again... I have to completely close AwesomeMiner, and then it will start mining the most profitable algo again.


Does anyone else experience these issues, and what can I do to fix this?
1) Which of these pools are most profitable according to the View Details dialog (right click on the miner and select View Details)? The hashrates defined in the profit profile is what the profit switcher is looking at

2) I think you may not get any accepted shares for a period of time, and then Awesome Miner will mark the pool as "Failed" for this reason. You can disable this behavior in the Options dialog, Profit Switching section where you can uncheck "Ignore pools with no accepted shares".


Please keep an eye on this miner to make sure that it eventually starts to produce accepted shares.



1) I am using the nvidia profile (fully benchmarked and saved to profile) in my online services tab. When skein algo on Mining Dutch is most profitable.... It's because your software is telling me it is the most profitable. Clicking view details to see the most profitable gives me the same information as the online services tab.
The issue is that it's not actually mining skein like I said. (Unless I uncheck all pools in profit switching menu and only allow Mining Dutch)

At the very least, if there is no fix for me... Is there at least a way to disable just 1 specific algo for 1 specific pool??? If that is not possible, could you please add that in an update? I believe the ability to disable specific algos for specific pools would help a lot of people. I looked around but never found any option to do this.

2) Again, like I said.... AwesomeMiner will be mining the most profitable algo, and there will be no errors, no rejected shares, no hardware errors, but it will randomly just start mining the next most profitable algo in the list while the other algo is still the most profitable.


Could the shares just be taking too long? I have ignore pools with no accepted shares set to 5 minutes.  

EDIT: Yes I believe I had the setting "Ignore pools with no accepted shares (in minutes)" set too low. Setting this number higher or disabling it appears to keep miners mining when they are working harder for shares in certain cases. But this still does not explain why AwesomeMiner starts mining x11 on Mining Dutch when it is supposed to be mining skein.... and it is only with skein, like right now I have some rigs mining Nist5 on Mining Dutch, and none of them are having any issues and they are all mining the correct algo.

1) I assume you are using built-in Online Services, in this case, yes you can disable algo per pool just by Online Services -> Select one(s) you want to edit (multi select with shift/ctrl possible) and press Edit/Buik Edit -> Uncheck the Include in Managed Profit Switcher box, this part was pretty straight forward hence not easy to search for posts with similar issue

2) If you are having the problem of pools deactivated due to no accepted shares, check the port you are using, and read the getting started page @ Mining-Dutch on which port to use for your hardware. In fact, the default Online Services currently in AM v4.7 is probably using the wrong port for most hobby miners (9998 is High Diff on Skein Multiport at MD) hence you are not getting accepted shares fast enough. Just change the port to Vardiff and try again. since I believe you have quite capable HW, you might not need to use the Low Diff port.

***
PS, if you have no ASICs or ASICs for certain ASIC algos, I suggest you disable most of the ASIC algos since no point mining them with GPUs/CPUs, disable via 1) ....above.

***
PPS.
While you might be experienced miner, I guess you are relatively new to AM or Profit Switching. My suggestion is to test various online services and find out which one suits you and filter out the ones that doesn't. If you don't do Auto Exchange at all, I suggest you look away from the Built-In Yiimp pools and manually add only the ones you like to use via Pool Groups.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Does anyone else have an issue with MiningDutch and the skein algorithm?

If I start Awesome Miner and I have all of my pools enabled in the profit switching menu, then Awesome Miner switches to Mining Dutch to mine the skein algo, it will instead start mining x11 (always the same, always x11).... and that is not profitable at all.... BUT, if I have only Mining Dutch selected in the profit switching menu, then start the miner, it mines skein normally with no problems.



The other problem that I have is that when I have all my pools enabled in the profit switching menu, AwesomeMiner will be mining the most profitable algo, and there will be no errors, no rejected shares, no hardware errors, but it will randomly just start mining the next most profitable algo in the list while the other algo is still the most profitable.

Also, when this happens, stopping the miner and restarting it will not make it start mining the top algo again... I have to completely close AwesomeMiner, and then it will start mining the most profitable algo again.


Does anyone else experience these issues, and what can I do to fix this?
1) Which of these pools are most profitable according to the View Details dialog (right click on the miner and select View Details)? The hashrates defined in the profit profile is what the profit switcher is looking at

2) I think you may not get any accepted shares for a period of time, and then Awesome Miner will mark the pool as "Failed" for this reason. You can disable this behavior in the Options dialog, Profit Switching section where you can uncheck "Ignore pools with no accepted shares".


Please keep an eye on this miner to make sure that it eventually starts to produce accepted shares.



1) I am using the nvidia profile (fully benchmarked and saved to profile) in my online services tab. When skein algo on Mining Dutch is most profitable.... It's because your software is telling me it is the most profitable. Clicking view details to see the most profitable gives me the same information as the online services tab.
The issue is that it's not actually mining skein like I said. (Unless I uncheck all pools in profit switching menu and only allow Mining Dutch)

At the very least, if there is no fix for me... Is there at least a way to disable just 1 specific algo for 1 specific pool??? If that is not possible, could you please add that in an update? I believe the ability to disable specific algos for specific pools would help a lot of people. I looked around but never found any option to do this.

2) Again, like I said.... AwesomeMiner will be mining the most profitable algo, and there will be no errors, no rejected shares, no hardware errors, but it will randomly just start mining the next most profitable algo in the list while the other algo is still the most profitable.


Could the shares just be taking too long? I have ignore pools with no accepted shares set to 5 minutes. 

EDIT: Yes I believe I had the setting "Ignore pools with no accepted shares (in minutes)" set too low. Setting this number higher or disabling it appears to keep miners mining when they are working harder for shares in certain cases. But this still does not explain why AwesomeMiner starts mining x11 on Mining Dutch when it is supposed to be mining skein.... and it is only with skein, like right now I have some rigs mining Nist5 on Mining Dutch, and none of them are having any issues and they are all mining the correct algo.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Another update: There are a number of people that are running Youtube channels, blogs and also discuss a lot on the forums on the topic of mining and Awesome Miner. I've been receiving a number of requests about introducing an affiliate program.

The idea is that if you sign up for the Awesome Miner Affiliate Program, you can get a referral link that you can put on your blog or in your forum signature. For each Awesome Miner license sale that is made where you referred the customer to the Awesome Miner web site, you will get a commission (for example 8 - 12 % of the license cost). The commission will only be provided for new license sales, not for upgrades or Cloud Services.

The Affiliate Program is not fully ready to go public yet, but I want to let you know what's in the pipeline. Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Awesome Miner version 4.7.1

- Antminer diagnostics feature improved to test the API connection
- Updated Mining Pool Hub pool for CryptonightV7
- Correction to MSI Afterburner integration to wait longer for the UI application to start after a reboot
- Correction to remove old Monero Cryptonight reference in favor of the new CryptonightV7 version
- Correction to Remote Proxy feature for connecting to correct hostnames

Thanks to the recent performance improvements in the software, it can now manage up to 10,000 miners.
Jump to: