Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 385. (Read 703143 times)

Thanks for your feedback. I'm very much open for a discussion on this topic.

Awesome Miner already have access to these numbers, so making some adjustments to the profit switcher should be possible. Please give me a little more time to investigate before I get back with a longer response.

What I had in mind since before was that the Awesome Miner cloud could help out here to build this statistics trend, so you don't have to run Awesome Miner for a longer period of time to build the trust-level. It could be provided for you.

Hi,

I've not received any e-mail about this. Any issues about licenses or payments are always given highest priority. Did you send the question to the Fastspring payment processor maybe - they can take up to one business day to respond. Please contact me so we can resolve this.

This will be corrected in v4.6.2.

Thanks for reporting this issue. A correction will soon be made available.

Thanks for your feedback. I've added more coin symbols in v4.6.2 that soon will be made available.

I see, i thought it was a huge company lol.
Actually my first order of buying the professional version was instant. But now the cloud service or the upgrade, it never goes through but deducts the payment :/

You cant expect it to be instant service bud, its basically a 1 man show running this software development in his spare time, if i recall this is just a hobby and not his actual main source of income. So you have to give him time to respond and allow him to sleep as well.

Does anyone else have had trouble purchasing?
I upgraded my license from professional to premium.
It took the money but the order didn't went through.

The support is very slow as well.
Can someone here help?

Patrike,

Anyway we can do some brainstorming together on a way to improve the Profit Switching mode of the software?

If i understand NemoMiner, basically its logging the 24hr est, 24hr actual, and Current est, then its doing a calculation to figure out a running offset.. then applying it to smooth out the outlier spikes in profit that result in poor actual pay.


Example:

x17:
Current: 0.01523 *which is based on current sharerate and exchange price
24hr Est: 0.01853 *which is a projection of the next 24hrs based on the current exchange rate
24hr Actual: 0.01544 *which is based on actual payouts from past 24hrs of exchanged coins

Trust:
(3/26/2018 0500EST 24hr Est:) - (3/27/2018 0500EST 24hr actual) = Trust  24hr Offset

Example:
 (0.01853)-(0.01544)=0.00309 Difference of 16.7%

So on the profit switching list,
it will compare the current price with a running offset to determine if its worth switching to, because if the current est... greater than the 16.7% current offset, than its more likely it will actually payout more.

Then the next day lets say the new next 24hr trust offset is 17.0%, it does an averaging
16.7 and 17.0 for an average running offset of 16.85% and so far as time of the software collects data.

One thing i noticed on nemo's is if the offset places the coin below the 24hr actual, it defaults to 24hr actual price on the list for profit switching.

Basically, the trust offset in nemo miner is just saying hey, this is the expected amount of drop in value on this algo after all the peeps switch over to catch the spikes in high current payout and its actually exchanged for payout to peeps. The part i dont know how it does it is how it is taking into account current prices to this trust offset to mix those values into the calculations, thus why i suggest some brainstorming by the masses to figure out a good way of doing this.

I completely agree with this step, i have a dedicated pair of rigs at home that i use to for testing purposes on a regular ongoing basis like this. This way i can assure my 120+ 1080ti's can be mining the correct path for the most money in my pocket.

Example right now i have the following test going on

Both rigs are watercooled, so GPU's see same thermal temps during mining...

Test Rig 1, I have GPU0 profit switching Nicehash, I have GPU1 profit switching Zpool, I have GPU2 profit switching Ahashpool, and GPU3 profit switching Zergpool.... Been running this rig for a few weeks nonstop and have been using this data to alter the profit factor numbers in Awesome Miner.

Test Rig 2, I have GPU0 clear so the computer can be used for normal use, GPU1 is running Awesome Miner profit switching all available algo's on Ahashpool, GPU2 is running NemoMinerv2.5 profit switching all available algo's on Ahashpool.

The interesting thing is i took the extra step and changed all the miners Awesome Miner uses to match the ones NemoMiner uses by adding them in as custom miners per algo, but the trust system the Nemo has going is somehow pulled ahead by 6.7% over a 47day period of running. This is why i currently have all of my farm still mining using NemoMiner, but i have them all turned on for API so i can track them in Awesome Miner, truly love AM over Nemo, just need some extra love to the profit switching side to be more competitive.

Good Example, i just looked over at Rig 2, AM is showing C11 as more profitable and currently mining it based on 24hr average stats, but Nemo is currently mining X17 and showing C11 down as the 15th spot on profit....

can you fix the bug where:
1) I sort the coin list by name
2) I start reading the list
3) list decides to re-sort itself by profit when I'm halfway through

It does this to me about 20 times per day and it's a bit annoying

Are you using the Awesome Miner Remote Service on the rigs?  If so, you don't have to specify the telemetry option... AM will do it for you.

I'm sure some of it is fudge factor in the math somewhere. Some of it is probably the actual time spent mining vs not. If you're switching algorithms often then that leaves alot of startup time and hashrate ramp up time that I'm sure drags down earnings alot too. I'm assuming there's also some slack from the time the new profit numbers are posted, the time it takes you to see that change, switch algos, and get accepted shares. Still it seems that some pools estimate better or control things better.

I started mininig on multipools 2 months ago. After 3 weeks I was sure that there was a deep discrepancy from what they declare to pay you and what they pay you in reality.
I am sure that it is not correct and that you lose a lot of power mining on multipool.. much better to find a profitable coin and then hold or sell it.

I stopped using them last week because the payouts started off well but then fell flat in a day or so. Not sure if it was related to their hardware issues or what. Definitely seems to be a big discrepancy between what AM thinks they should be paying per day for some of the algorithms MPH doesn't have vs what's actually paid.

Maybe it depends on your equipment/algorithms, cause for me going from best to worst, Zergpool, Niceash, Ahashpool, Miningpoolhub, Zpool, Hashrefinery. Still haven't gotten around to setting up Blazepool and trying that out. Of course YMMV.

Is it just me or does ZergPool just seem to suck? I am getting WAY less BTC payouts than I think I should be...

Hi
I bought awesome miner for 10 miners, very great tool, eventhough i still have lot too learn to master it
I have 7 rigs, but awesome miner can only detect those running claymore, but not DTSM, even if i put the option -- telemetry 2222, is there anything else to set up so he can see them as external miner from a computer that is not mining ?

Could anyone explain to me how to setup awesome miner with Zpool? I've tried to check Select BTC Payout option in Profit Switching, add c=BTC parameter in the password filed in Online Services fo Zpool (all algos), add c=BTC to command-line and to the Zpool template. Pool also show me right version of my miner and Extra c=BTC is correct. But payouts only in SYS coins. Of course I added BTC wallet address to the Zpool filed and the address is correct. What I'm doing wrong? How to make awesomeminer to work with Zpool correctly?

Yes, bitcore actual profit turned to zero. Thanks for your attention. AM has no problem.
But Awesome miner has another problem after update. Bitcore, HSR, Keccakc and X16r were added, but I already had them in awesome miner before. After deleting my manual settings of these algos I have several problems with zpool algos:
https://yadi.sk/i/oZXRSgSU3TmAXj
Patrike, Do you have any ideas how to repair this? Thanks.